Cargando…

Trends in quality of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma care: is it getting better?

This study outlines trends in quality of delivered non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) care in the Netherlands between 2007 and 2011 and to what extend this was influenced by the national Visible Care program, which aimed at increasing transparency by providing insight into the quality of healthcare. We an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stienen, J. J. C., Ottevanger, P. B., Wennekes, L., van de Schans, S. A. M., Dekker, H. M., van der Maazen, R. W. M., van Krieken, J. H. J. M., Blijlevens, N. M. A., Hermens, R. P. M. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4432098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25772630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-015-2340-0
_version_ 1782371443844055040
author Stienen, J. J. C.
Ottevanger, P. B.
Wennekes, L.
van de Schans, S. A. M.
Dekker, H. M.
van der Maazen, R. W. M.
van Krieken, J. H. J. M.
Blijlevens, N. M. A.
Hermens, R. P. M. G.
author_facet Stienen, J. J. C.
Ottevanger, P. B.
Wennekes, L.
van de Schans, S. A. M.
Dekker, H. M.
van der Maazen, R. W. M.
van Krieken, J. H. J. M.
Blijlevens, N. M. A.
Hermens, R. P. M. G.
author_sort Stienen, J. J. C.
collection PubMed
description This study outlines trends in quality of delivered non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) care in the Netherlands between 2007 and 2011 and to what extend this was influenced by the national Visible Care program, which aimed at increasing transparency by providing insight into the quality of healthcare. We analyzed data collected from medical records in two observational studies, combined into 20 validated quality indicators (QIs) of which 6 were included in the national program. A random sample of 771 patients, diagnosed with NHL in 26 Dutch hospitals, was examined. Multilevel regression analyses were used to assess differences in quality of NHL care and to provide insight into the effect of the national program. We reported improved adherence to only 3 out of 6 QIs involved in the national program and none of the other 14 validated QIs. Improvement was shown for performance of all recommended staging techniques (from 26  to  43 %), assessment of International Prognostic Index (from 21  to  43 %), and multidisciplinary discussion of patients (from 23  to  41 %). We found limited improvement in quality of NHL care between 2007 and 2011; improvement potential (<80 % adherence) was still present for 13 QIs. The national program seems to have a small positive effect, but has not influenced all 20 indicators which represent the most important, measurable parts in quality of NHL care. These results illustrate the need for tailored implementation and quality improvement initiatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4432098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44320982015-05-19 Trends in quality of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma care: is it getting better? Stienen, J. J. C. Ottevanger, P. B. Wennekes, L. van de Schans, S. A. M. Dekker, H. M. van der Maazen, R. W. M. van Krieken, J. H. J. M. Blijlevens, N. M. A. Hermens, R. P. M. G. Ann Hematol Original Article This study outlines trends in quality of delivered non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) care in the Netherlands between 2007 and 2011 and to what extend this was influenced by the national Visible Care program, which aimed at increasing transparency by providing insight into the quality of healthcare. We analyzed data collected from medical records in two observational studies, combined into 20 validated quality indicators (QIs) of which 6 were included in the national program. A random sample of 771 patients, diagnosed with NHL in 26 Dutch hospitals, was examined. Multilevel regression analyses were used to assess differences in quality of NHL care and to provide insight into the effect of the national program. We reported improved adherence to only 3 out of 6 QIs involved in the national program and none of the other 14 validated QIs. Improvement was shown for performance of all recommended staging techniques (from 26  to  43 %), assessment of International Prognostic Index (from 21  to  43 %), and multidisciplinary discussion of patients (from 23  to  41 %). We found limited improvement in quality of NHL care between 2007 and 2011; improvement potential (<80 % adherence) was still present for 13 QIs. The national program seems to have a small positive effect, but has not influenced all 20 indicators which represent the most important, measurable parts in quality of NHL care. These results illustrate the need for tailored implementation and quality improvement initiatives. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-03-15 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4432098/ /pubmed/25772630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-015-2340-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Stienen, J. J. C.
Ottevanger, P. B.
Wennekes, L.
van de Schans, S. A. M.
Dekker, H. M.
van der Maazen, R. W. M.
van Krieken, J. H. J. M.
Blijlevens, N. M. A.
Hermens, R. P. M. G.
Trends in quality of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma care: is it getting better?
title Trends in quality of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma care: is it getting better?
title_full Trends in quality of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma care: is it getting better?
title_fullStr Trends in quality of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma care: is it getting better?
title_full_unstemmed Trends in quality of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma care: is it getting better?
title_short Trends in quality of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma care: is it getting better?
title_sort trends in quality of non-hodgkin’s lymphoma care: is it getting better?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4432098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25772630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00277-015-2340-0
work_keys_str_mv AT stienenjjc trendsinqualityofnonhodgkinslymphomacareisitgettingbetter
AT ottevangerpb trendsinqualityofnonhodgkinslymphomacareisitgettingbetter
AT wennekesl trendsinqualityofnonhodgkinslymphomacareisitgettingbetter
AT vandeschanssam trendsinqualityofnonhodgkinslymphomacareisitgettingbetter
AT dekkerhm trendsinqualityofnonhodgkinslymphomacareisitgettingbetter
AT vandermaazenrwm trendsinqualityofnonhodgkinslymphomacareisitgettingbetter
AT vankriekenjhjm trendsinqualityofnonhodgkinslymphomacareisitgettingbetter
AT blijlevensnma trendsinqualityofnonhodgkinslymphomacareisitgettingbetter
AT hermensrpmg trendsinqualityofnonhodgkinslymphomacareisitgettingbetter
AT trendsinqualityofnonhodgkinslymphomacareisitgettingbetter