Cargando…

Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease

OBJECTIVE: Autologous bone graft with anterior plating had been a standard method for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Drawbacks of a standard method were donor site problem and problem associated with anterior plate. The stand-alone cage was introduced to reduce such problems. Howeve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Chang Hyoun, Kim, Chi Heon, Chung, Chun Kee, Jahng, Tae-Ahn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4432378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25983782
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2012.9.1.12
_version_ 1782371472679895040
author Kim, Chang Hyoun
Kim, Chi Heon
Chung, Chun Kee
Jahng, Tae-Ahn
author_facet Kim, Chang Hyoun
Kim, Chi Heon
Chung, Chun Kee
Jahng, Tae-Ahn
author_sort Kim, Chang Hyoun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Autologous bone graft with anterior plating had been a standard method for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Drawbacks of a standard method were donor site problem and problem associated with anterior plate. The stand-alone cage was introduced to reduce such problems. However, problems associated with subsidence and local kyphosis at the index level (segmental kyphosis) still persist with stand-alone cage and a standard method would be required in some cases. It seems that harvest of autologous bone and anterior plating procedure is time consuming, but this has not been verified. The aim of this study was to compare the operating time between patients operated on with stand-alone cage versus a standard method for single-level cervical disc disease. METHODS: Consecutive 29 patients (M:F=18:11; mean age, 58.4±12.4 years), who had undergone ACDF for single-level disc disease by a single surgeon from incision to closure during 2009-2011, were selected for this retrospective study. Seventeen patients were operated with stand-alone cage (Group I), and twelve patients were with a standard method (Group II). Operating time (from incision to closure), estimated blood loss, clinical and radiological outcomes were compared. Follow-up period was 11.4±6.3 months. RESULTS: Operating time was not different between groups longer; Group I (96.1±28.7 minutes) and Group II (112.4±31.7 minutes) (p=0.13). There was no surgery related complication. Excellent or good outcome was achieved in 11 and 10 patients of group I and II, respectively. Bony fusion was achieved in 15 and 10 patients of group I and II respectively, while one subsidence occurred in each group. Postoperative segmental angle at the index level and cervical curvature was not different between groups. No patient complained donor site pain at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ACDF with a standard method for single-level cervical disc disease was not a time-consuming procedure comparing stand-alone cage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4432378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44323782015-05-15 Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease Kim, Chang Hyoun Kim, Chi Heon Chung, Chun Kee Jahng, Tae-Ahn Korean J Spine Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: Autologous bone graft with anterior plating had been a standard method for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Drawbacks of a standard method were donor site problem and problem associated with anterior plate. The stand-alone cage was introduced to reduce such problems. However, problems associated with subsidence and local kyphosis at the index level (segmental kyphosis) still persist with stand-alone cage and a standard method would be required in some cases. It seems that harvest of autologous bone and anterior plating procedure is time consuming, but this has not been verified. The aim of this study was to compare the operating time between patients operated on with stand-alone cage versus a standard method for single-level cervical disc disease. METHODS: Consecutive 29 patients (M:F=18:11; mean age, 58.4±12.4 years), who had undergone ACDF for single-level disc disease by a single surgeon from incision to closure during 2009-2011, were selected for this retrospective study. Seventeen patients were operated with stand-alone cage (Group I), and twelve patients were with a standard method (Group II). Operating time (from incision to closure), estimated blood loss, clinical and radiological outcomes were compared. Follow-up period was 11.4±6.3 months. RESULTS: Operating time was not different between groups longer; Group I (96.1±28.7 minutes) and Group II (112.4±31.7 minutes) (p=0.13). There was no surgery related complication. Excellent or good outcome was achieved in 11 and 10 patients of group I and II, respectively. Bony fusion was achieved in 15 and 10 patients of group I and II respectively, while one subsidence occurred in each group. Postoperative segmental angle at the index level and cervical curvature was not different between groups. No patient complained donor site pain at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ACDF with a standard method for single-level cervical disc disease was not a time-consuming procedure comparing stand-alone cage. The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2012-03 2012-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4432378/ /pubmed/25983782 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2012.9.1.12 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Kim, Chang Hyoun
Kim, Chi Heon
Chung, Chun Kee
Jahng, Tae-Ahn
Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease
title Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease
title_full Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease
title_fullStr Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease
title_short Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease
title_sort comparison of operating time between stand-alone cage and a standard method for a single level cervical disc disease
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4432378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25983782
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2012.9.1.12
work_keys_str_mv AT kimchanghyoun comparisonofoperatingtimebetweenstandalonecageandastandardmethodforasinglelevelcervicaldiscdisease
AT kimchiheon comparisonofoperatingtimebetweenstandalonecageandastandardmethodforasinglelevelcervicaldiscdisease
AT chungchunkee comparisonofoperatingtimebetweenstandalonecageandastandardmethodforasinglelevelcervicaldiscdisease
AT jahngtaeahn comparisonofoperatingtimebetweenstandalonecageandastandardmethodforasinglelevelcervicaldiscdisease