Cargando…
Genomic Prostate Cancer Classifier Predicts Biochemical Failure and Metastases in Patients After Postoperative Radiation Therapy
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that a genomic classifier (GC) would predict biochemical failure (BF) and distant metastasis (DM) in men receiving radiation therapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Among patients who underwent post-RP RT, 139 were identified for pT3 or p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4432840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25035207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.052 |
_version_ | 1782371544288198656 |
---|---|
author | Den, Robert B. Feng, Felix Y. Showalter, Timothy N. Mishra, Mark V. Trabulsi, Edouard J. Lallas, Costas D. Gomella, Leonard G. Kelly, W. Kevin Birbe, Ruth C. McCue, Peter A. Ghadessi, Mercedeh Yousefi, Kasra Davicioni, Elai Knudsen, Karen E. Dicker, Adam P. |
author_facet | Den, Robert B. Feng, Felix Y. Showalter, Timothy N. Mishra, Mark V. Trabulsi, Edouard J. Lallas, Costas D. Gomella, Leonard G. Kelly, W. Kevin Birbe, Ruth C. McCue, Peter A. Ghadessi, Mercedeh Yousefi, Kasra Davicioni, Elai Knudsen, Karen E. Dicker, Adam P. |
author_sort | Den, Robert B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that a genomic classifier (GC) would predict biochemical failure (BF) and distant metastasis (DM) in men receiving radiation therapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Among patients who underwent post-RP RT, 139 were identified for pT3 or positive margin, who did not receive neoadjuvant hormones and had paraffin-embedded specimens. Ribonucleic acid was extracted from the highest Gleason grade focus and applied to a high-density-oligonucleotide microarray. Receiver operating characteristic, calibration, cumulative incidence, and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess GC performance for predicting BF and DM after post-RP RT in comparison with clinical nomograms. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the Stephenson model was 0.70 for both BF and DM, with addition of GC significantly improving area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to 0.78 and 0.80, respectively. Stratified by GC risk groups, 8-year cumulative incidence was 21%, 48%, and 81% for BF (P<.0001) and for DM was 0, 12%, and 17% (P=.032) for low, intermediate, and high GC, respectively. In multivariable analysis, patients with high GC had a hazard ratio of 8.1 and 14.3 for BF and DM. In patients with intermediate or high GC, those irradiated with undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL) had median BF survival of >8 years, compared with <4 years for patients with detectable PSA (>0.2 ng/mL) before initiation of RT. At 8 years, the DM cumulative incidence for patients with high GC and RTwith undetectable PSA was 3%, compared with 23% with detectable PSA (P=.03). No outcome differences were observed for low GC between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The GC predicted BF and metastasis after post-RP irradiation. Patients with lower GC risk may benefit from delayed RT, as opposed to those with higher GC; however, this needs prospective validation. Genomic-based models may be useful for improved decision-making for treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4432840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44328402015-08-01 Genomic Prostate Cancer Classifier Predicts Biochemical Failure and Metastases in Patients After Postoperative Radiation Therapy Den, Robert B. Feng, Felix Y. Showalter, Timothy N. Mishra, Mark V. Trabulsi, Edouard J. Lallas, Costas D. Gomella, Leonard G. Kelly, W. Kevin Birbe, Ruth C. McCue, Peter A. Ghadessi, Mercedeh Yousefi, Kasra Davicioni, Elai Knudsen, Karen E. Dicker, Adam P. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Article PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that a genomic classifier (GC) would predict biochemical failure (BF) and distant metastasis (DM) in men receiving radiation therapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Among patients who underwent post-RP RT, 139 were identified for pT3 or positive margin, who did not receive neoadjuvant hormones and had paraffin-embedded specimens. Ribonucleic acid was extracted from the highest Gleason grade focus and applied to a high-density-oligonucleotide microarray. Receiver operating characteristic, calibration, cumulative incidence, and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess GC performance for predicting BF and DM after post-RP RT in comparison with clinical nomograms. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the Stephenson model was 0.70 for both BF and DM, with addition of GC significantly improving area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to 0.78 and 0.80, respectively. Stratified by GC risk groups, 8-year cumulative incidence was 21%, 48%, and 81% for BF (P<.0001) and for DM was 0, 12%, and 17% (P=.032) for low, intermediate, and high GC, respectively. In multivariable analysis, patients with high GC had a hazard ratio of 8.1 and 14.3 for BF and DM. In patients with intermediate or high GC, those irradiated with undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL) had median BF survival of >8 years, compared with <4 years for patients with detectable PSA (>0.2 ng/mL) before initiation of RT. At 8 years, the DM cumulative incidence for patients with high GC and RTwith undetectable PSA was 3%, compared with 23% with detectable PSA (P=.03). No outcome differences were observed for low GC between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The GC predicted BF and metastasis after post-RP irradiation. Patients with lower GC risk may benefit from delayed RT, as opposed to those with higher GC; however, this needs prospective validation. Genomic-based models may be useful for improved decision-making for treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. 2014-07-08 2014-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4432840/ /pubmed/25035207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.052 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Den, Robert B. Feng, Felix Y. Showalter, Timothy N. Mishra, Mark V. Trabulsi, Edouard J. Lallas, Costas D. Gomella, Leonard G. Kelly, W. Kevin Birbe, Ruth C. McCue, Peter A. Ghadessi, Mercedeh Yousefi, Kasra Davicioni, Elai Knudsen, Karen E. Dicker, Adam P. Genomic Prostate Cancer Classifier Predicts Biochemical Failure and Metastases in Patients After Postoperative Radiation Therapy |
title | Genomic Prostate Cancer Classifier Predicts Biochemical Failure and Metastases in Patients After Postoperative Radiation Therapy |
title_full | Genomic Prostate Cancer Classifier Predicts Biochemical Failure and Metastases in Patients After Postoperative Radiation Therapy |
title_fullStr | Genomic Prostate Cancer Classifier Predicts Biochemical Failure and Metastases in Patients After Postoperative Radiation Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Genomic Prostate Cancer Classifier Predicts Biochemical Failure and Metastases in Patients After Postoperative Radiation Therapy |
title_short | Genomic Prostate Cancer Classifier Predicts Biochemical Failure and Metastases in Patients After Postoperative Radiation Therapy |
title_sort | genomic prostate cancer classifier predicts biochemical failure and metastases in patients after postoperative radiation therapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4432840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25035207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT denrobertb genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT fengfelixy genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT showaltertimothyn genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT mishramarkv genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT trabulsiedouardj genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT lallascostasd genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT gomellaleonardg genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT kellywkevin genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT birberuthc genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT mccuepetera genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT ghadessimercedeh genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT yousefikasra genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT davicionielai genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT knudsenkarene genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy AT dickeradamp genomicprostatecancerclassifierpredictsbiochemicalfailureandmetastasesinpatientsafterpostoperativeradiationtherapy |