Cargando…

Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The optimal post-operative care regimen after surgically fixed Lauge Hansen supination exorotation injuries remains to be established. This study compares whether unprotected weight bearing as tolerated is superior to protected weight bearing and unprotected non-weight bearing in terms o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Briet, Jan Paul, Houwert, Roderick M, Smeeing, Diederik PJ, Pawiroredjo, Janity S, Kelder, Johannes C, Lansink, Koen W, Leenen, Luke PH, van der Zwaal, Peer, van Zutphen, Stephan WAM, Hoogendoorn, Jochem M, van Heijl, Mark, Verleisdonk, Egbert JMM, van Lammeren, Guus W, Segers, Michiel J, Hietbrink, Falco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0714-1
_version_ 1782371569662689280
author Briet, Jan Paul
Houwert, Roderick M
Smeeing, Diederik PJ
Pawiroredjo, Janity S
Kelder, Johannes C
Lansink, Koen W
Leenen, Luke PH
van der Zwaal, Peer
van Zutphen, Stephan WAM
Hoogendoorn, Jochem M
van Heijl, Mark
Verleisdonk, Egbert JMM
van Lammeren, Guus W
Segers, Michiel J
Hietbrink, Falco
author_facet Briet, Jan Paul
Houwert, Roderick M
Smeeing, Diederik PJ
Pawiroredjo, Janity S
Kelder, Johannes C
Lansink, Koen W
Leenen, Luke PH
van der Zwaal, Peer
van Zutphen, Stephan WAM
Hoogendoorn, Jochem M
van Heijl, Mark
Verleisdonk, Egbert JMM
van Lammeren, Guus W
Segers, Michiel J
Hietbrink, Falco
author_sort Briet, Jan Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal post-operative care regimen after surgically fixed Lauge Hansen supination exorotation injuries remains to be established. This study compares whether unprotected weight bearing as tolerated is superior to protected weight bearing and unprotected non-weight bearing in terms of functional outcome and safety. METHODS/DESIGN: The WOW! Study is a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Patients between 18 and 65 years of age with a Lauge Hansen supination exorotation type 2, 3 or 4 ankle fractures requiring surgical treatment are eligible for inclusion. An expert panel validates the classification and inclusion eligibility. After surgery, patients are randomized to either the 1) unprotected non-weight-bearing, 2) protected weight-bearing, or 3) unprotected weight-bearing group. The primary outcome measure is ankle-specific disability measured by the Olerud-Molander ankle score. Secondary outcomes are 1) quality of life (e.g., return to work and resumption of sport), 2) complications, 3) range of motion, 4) calf wasting, and 5) maximum pressure load after 3 months and 1 year. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of unprotected weight bearing with two commonly used post-operative treatment regimens after internal fixation of specified, intrinsically stable but displaced ankle fractures. An expert panel has been established to evaluate every potential subject, which ensures that every patient is strictly screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and that there is a clear indication for surgical fixation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The WOW! Study is registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR3727). Date of registration: 28-11-2012.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4433015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44330152015-05-16 Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Briet, Jan Paul Houwert, Roderick M Smeeing, Diederik PJ Pawiroredjo, Janity S Kelder, Johannes C Lansink, Koen W Leenen, Luke PH van der Zwaal, Peer van Zutphen, Stephan WAM Hoogendoorn, Jochem M van Heijl, Mark Verleisdonk, Egbert JMM van Lammeren, Guus W Segers, Michiel J Hietbrink, Falco Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The optimal post-operative care regimen after surgically fixed Lauge Hansen supination exorotation injuries remains to be established. This study compares whether unprotected weight bearing as tolerated is superior to protected weight bearing and unprotected non-weight bearing in terms of functional outcome and safety. METHODS/DESIGN: The WOW! Study is a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Patients between 18 and 65 years of age with a Lauge Hansen supination exorotation type 2, 3 or 4 ankle fractures requiring surgical treatment are eligible for inclusion. An expert panel validates the classification and inclusion eligibility. After surgery, patients are randomized to either the 1) unprotected non-weight-bearing, 2) protected weight-bearing, or 3) unprotected weight-bearing group. The primary outcome measure is ankle-specific disability measured by the Olerud-Molander ankle score. Secondary outcomes are 1) quality of life (e.g., return to work and resumption of sport), 2) complications, 3) range of motion, 4) calf wasting, and 5) maximum pressure load after 3 months and 1 year. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of unprotected weight bearing with two commonly used post-operative treatment regimens after internal fixation of specified, intrinsically stable but displaced ankle fractures. An expert panel has been established to evaluate every potential subject, which ensures that every patient is strictly screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and that there is a clear indication for surgical fixation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The WOW! Study is registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR3727). Date of registration: 28-11-2012. BioMed Central 2015-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4433015/ /pubmed/25927626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0714-1 Text en © Briet et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Briet, Jan Paul
Houwert, Roderick M
Smeeing, Diederik PJ
Pawiroredjo, Janity S
Kelder, Johannes C
Lansink, Koen W
Leenen, Luke PH
van der Zwaal, Peer
van Zutphen, Stephan WAM
Hoogendoorn, Jochem M
van Heijl, Mark
Verleisdonk, Egbert JMM
van Lammeren, Guus W
Segers, Michiel J
Hietbrink, Falco
Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the wow! study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927626
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0714-1
work_keys_str_mv AT brietjanpaul weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT houwertroderickm weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT smeeingdiederikpj weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pawiroredjojanitys weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kelderjohannesc weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lansinkkoenw weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leenenlukeph weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderzwaalpeer weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanzutphenstephanwam weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hoogendoornjochemm weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanheijlmark weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT verleisdonkegbertjmm weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanlammerenguusw weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT segersmichielj weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hietbrinkfalco weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial