Cargando…
Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The optimal post-operative care regimen after surgically fixed Lauge Hansen supination exorotation injuries remains to be established. This study compares whether unprotected weight bearing as tolerated is superior to protected weight bearing and unprotected non-weight bearing in terms o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0714-1 |
_version_ | 1782371569662689280 |
---|---|
author | Briet, Jan Paul Houwert, Roderick M Smeeing, Diederik PJ Pawiroredjo, Janity S Kelder, Johannes C Lansink, Koen W Leenen, Luke PH van der Zwaal, Peer van Zutphen, Stephan WAM Hoogendoorn, Jochem M van Heijl, Mark Verleisdonk, Egbert JMM van Lammeren, Guus W Segers, Michiel J Hietbrink, Falco |
author_facet | Briet, Jan Paul Houwert, Roderick M Smeeing, Diederik PJ Pawiroredjo, Janity S Kelder, Johannes C Lansink, Koen W Leenen, Luke PH van der Zwaal, Peer van Zutphen, Stephan WAM Hoogendoorn, Jochem M van Heijl, Mark Verleisdonk, Egbert JMM van Lammeren, Guus W Segers, Michiel J Hietbrink, Falco |
author_sort | Briet, Jan Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal post-operative care regimen after surgically fixed Lauge Hansen supination exorotation injuries remains to be established. This study compares whether unprotected weight bearing as tolerated is superior to protected weight bearing and unprotected non-weight bearing in terms of functional outcome and safety. METHODS/DESIGN: The WOW! Study is a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Patients between 18 and 65 years of age with a Lauge Hansen supination exorotation type 2, 3 or 4 ankle fractures requiring surgical treatment are eligible for inclusion. An expert panel validates the classification and inclusion eligibility. After surgery, patients are randomized to either the 1) unprotected non-weight-bearing, 2) protected weight-bearing, or 3) unprotected weight-bearing group. The primary outcome measure is ankle-specific disability measured by the Olerud-Molander ankle score. Secondary outcomes are 1) quality of life (e.g., return to work and resumption of sport), 2) complications, 3) range of motion, 4) calf wasting, and 5) maximum pressure load after 3 months and 1 year. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of unprotected weight bearing with two commonly used post-operative treatment regimens after internal fixation of specified, intrinsically stable but displaced ankle fractures. An expert panel has been established to evaluate every potential subject, which ensures that every patient is strictly screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and that there is a clear indication for surgical fixation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The WOW! Study is registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR3727). Date of registration: 28-11-2012. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4433015 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44330152015-05-16 Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Briet, Jan Paul Houwert, Roderick M Smeeing, Diederik PJ Pawiroredjo, Janity S Kelder, Johannes C Lansink, Koen W Leenen, Luke PH van der Zwaal, Peer van Zutphen, Stephan WAM Hoogendoorn, Jochem M van Heijl, Mark Verleisdonk, Egbert JMM van Lammeren, Guus W Segers, Michiel J Hietbrink, Falco Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The optimal post-operative care regimen after surgically fixed Lauge Hansen supination exorotation injuries remains to be established. This study compares whether unprotected weight bearing as tolerated is superior to protected weight bearing and unprotected non-weight bearing in terms of functional outcome and safety. METHODS/DESIGN: The WOW! Study is a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Patients between 18 and 65 years of age with a Lauge Hansen supination exorotation type 2, 3 or 4 ankle fractures requiring surgical treatment are eligible for inclusion. An expert panel validates the classification and inclusion eligibility. After surgery, patients are randomized to either the 1) unprotected non-weight-bearing, 2) protected weight-bearing, or 3) unprotected weight-bearing group. The primary outcome measure is ankle-specific disability measured by the Olerud-Molander ankle score. Secondary outcomes are 1) quality of life (e.g., return to work and resumption of sport), 2) complications, 3) range of motion, 4) calf wasting, and 5) maximum pressure load after 3 months and 1 year. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of unprotected weight bearing with two commonly used post-operative treatment regimens after internal fixation of specified, intrinsically stable but displaced ankle fractures. An expert panel has been established to evaluate every potential subject, which ensures that every patient is strictly screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and that there is a clear indication for surgical fixation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The WOW! Study is registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR3727). Date of registration: 28-11-2012. BioMed Central 2015-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4433015/ /pubmed/25927626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0714-1 Text en © Briet et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Briet, Jan Paul Houwert, Roderick M Smeeing, Diederik PJ Pawiroredjo, Janity S Kelder, Johannes C Lansink, Koen W Leenen, Luke PH van der Zwaal, Peer van Zutphen, Stephan WAM Hoogendoorn, Jochem M van Heijl, Mark Verleisdonk, Egbert JMM van Lammeren, Guus W Segers, Michiel J Hietbrink, Falco Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the WOW! Study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | weight bearing or non-weight bearing after surgically fixed ankle fractures, the wow! study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25927626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0714-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brietjanpaul weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT houwertroderickm weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT smeeingdiederikpj weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pawiroredjojanitys weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kelderjohannesc weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lansinkkoenw weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leenenlukeph weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanderzwaalpeer weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanzutphenstephanwam weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hoogendoornjochemm weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanheijlmark weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT verleisdonkegbertjmm weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanlammerenguusw weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT segersmichielj weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hietbrinkfalco weightbearingornonweightbearingaftersurgicallyfixedanklefracturesthewowstudystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |