Cargando…

Environmental chemicals and DNA methylation in adults: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence

Current evidence supports the notion that environmental exposures are associated with DNA-methylation and expression changes that can impact human health. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of epidemiologic studies evaluating the association between environmental chemicals with DNA met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruiz-Hernandez, Adrian, Kuo, Chin-Chi, Rentero-Garrido, Pilar, Tang, Wan-Yee, Redon, Josep, Ordovas, Jose M, Navas-Acien, Ana, Tellez-Plaza, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25984247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-015-0055-7
_version_ 1782371575815733248
author Ruiz-Hernandez, Adrian
Kuo, Chin-Chi
Rentero-Garrido, Pilar
Tang, Wan-Yee
Redon, Josep
Ordovas, Jose M
Navas-Acien, Ana
Tellez-Plaza, Maria
author_facet Ruiz-Hernandez, Adrian
Kuo, Chin-Chi
Rentero-Garrido, Pilar
Tang, Wan-Yee
Redon, Josep
Ordovas, Jose M
Navas-Acien, Ana
Tellez-Plaza, Maria
author_sort Ruiz-Hernandez, Adrian
collection PubMed
description Current evidence supports the notion that environmental exposures are associated with DNA-methylation and expression changes that can impact human health. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of epidemiologic studies evaluating the association between environmental chemicals with DNA methylation levels in adults. After excluding arsenic, recently evaluated in a systematic review, we identified a total of 17 articles (6 on cadmium, 4 on lead, 2 on mercury, 1 on nickel, 1 on antimony, 1 on tungsten, 5 on persistent organic pollutants and perfluorinated compounds, 1 on bisphenol A, and 3 on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons). The selected articles reported quantitative methods to determine DNA methylation including immunocolorimetric assays for total content of genomic DNA methylation, and microarray technologies, methylation-specific quantitative PCR, Luminometric Methylation Assay (LUMA), and bisulfite pyrosequencing for DNA methylation content of genomic sites such as gene promoters, LINE-1, Alu elements, and others. Considering consistency, temporality, strength, dose-response relationship, and biological plausibility, we concluded that the current evidence is not sufficient to provide inference because differences across studies and limited samples sizes make it difficult to compare across studies and to evaluate sources of heterogeneity. Important questions for future research include the need for larger and longitudinal studies, the validation of findings, and the systematic evaluation of the dose-response relationships. Future studies should also consider the evaluation of epigenetic marks recently in the research spotlight such as DNA hydroxymethylation and the role of underlying genetic variants. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13148-015-0055-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4433069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44330692015-05-16 Environmental chemicals and DNA methylation in adults: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence Ruiz-Hernandez, Adrian Kuo, Chin-Chi Rentero-Garrido, Pilar Tang, Wan-Yee Redon, Josep Ordovas, Jose M Navas-Acien, Ana Tellez-Plaza, Maria Clin Epigenetics Review Current evidence supports the notion that environmental exposures are associated with DNA-methylation and expression changes that can impact human health. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of epidemiologic studies evaluating the association between environmental chemicals with DNA methylation levels in adults. After excluding arsenic, recently evaluated in a systematic review, we identified a total of 17 articles (6 on cadmium, 4 on lead, 2 on mercury, 1 on nickel, 1 on antimony, 1 on tungsten, 5 on persistent organic pollutants and perfluorinated compounds, 1 on bisphenol A, and 3 on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons). The selected articles reported quantitative methods to determine DNA methylation including immunocolorimetric assays for total content of genomic DNA methylation, and microarray technologies, methylation-specific quantitative PCR, Luminometric Methylation Assay (LUMA), and bisulfite pyrosequencing for DNA methylation content of genomic sites such as gene promoters, LINE-1, Alu elements, and others. Considering consistency, temporality, strength, dose-response relationship, and biological plausibility, we concluded that the current evidence is not sufficient to provide inference because differences across studies and limited samples sizes make it difficult to compare across studies and to evaluate sources of heterogeneity. Important questions for future research include the need for larger and longitudinal studies, the validation of findings, and the systematic evaluation of the dose-response relationships. Future studies should also consider the evaluation of epigenetic marks recently in the research spotlight such as DNA hydroxymethylation and the role of underlying genetic variants. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13148-015-0055-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4433069/ /pubmed/25984247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-015-0055-7 Text en © Ruiz-Hernandez et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Ruiz-Hernandez, Adrian
Kuo, Chin-Chi
Rentero-Garrido, Pilar
Tang, Wan-Yee
Redon, Josep
Ordovas, Jose M
Navas-Acien, Ana
Tellez-Plaza, Maria
Environmental chemicals and DNA methylation in adults: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence
title Environmental chemicals and DNA methylation in adults: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence
title_full Environmental chemicals and DNA methylation in adults: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence
title_fullStr Environmental chemicals and DNA methylation in adults: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence
title_full_unstemmed Environmental chemicals and DNA methylation in adults: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence
title_short Environmental chemicals and DNA methylation in adults: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence
title_sort environmental chemicals and dna methylation in adults: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25984247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-015-0055-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ruizhernandezadrian environmentalchemicalsanddnamethylationinadultsasystematicreviewoftheepidemiologicevidence
AT kuochinchi environmentalchemicalsanddnamethylationinadultsasystematicreviewoftheepidemiologicevidence
AT renterogarridopilar environmentalchemicalsanddnamethylationinadultsasystematicreviewoftheepidemiologicevidence
AT tangwanyee environmentalchemicalsanddnamethylationinadultsasystematicreviewoftheepidemiologicevidence
AT redonjosep environmentalchemicalsanddnamethylationinadultsasystematicreviewoftheepidemiologicevidence
AT ordovasjosem environmentalchemicalsanddnamethylationinadultsasystematicreviewoftheepidemiologicevidence
AT navasacienana environmentalchemicalsanddnamethylationinadultsasystematicreviewoftheepidemiologicevidence
AT tellezplazamaria environmentalchemicalsanddnamethylationinadultsasystematicreviewoftheepidemiologicevidence