Cargando…

Reserve Design under Climate Change: From Land Facets Back to Ecosystem Representation

Ecosystem distributions are expected to shift as a result of global warming, raising concerns about the long-term utility of reserve systems based on coarse-filter ecosystem representation. We tested the extent to which proportional ecosystem representation targets would be maintained under a changi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneider, Richard R., Bayne, Erin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25978759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126918
_version_ 1782371595320295424
author Schneider, Richard R.
Bayne, Erin M.
author_facet Schneider, Richard R.
Bayne, Erin M.
author_sort Schneider, Richard R.
collection PubMed
description Ecosystem distributions are expected to shift as a result of global warming, raising concerns about the long-term utility of reserve systems based on coarse-filter ecosystem representation. We tested the extent to which proportional ecosystem representation targets would be maintained under a changing climate by projecting the distribution of the major ecosystems of Alberta, Canada, into the future using bioclimatic envelope models and then calculating the composition of reserves in successive periods. We used the Marxan conservation planning software to generate the suite of reserve systems for our test, varying the representation target and degree of reserve clumping. Our climate envelope projections for the 2080s indicate that virtually all reserves will, in time, be comprised of different ecosystem types than today. Nevertheless, our proportional targets for ecosystem representation were maintained across all time periods, with only minor exceptions. We hypothesize that this stability in representation arises because ecosystems may be serving as proxies for land facets, the stable abiotic landscape features that delineate major arenas of biological activity. The implication is that accommodating climate change may not require abandoning the conventional ecosystem-based approach to reserve design in favour of a strictly abiotic approach, since the two approaches may be largely synonymous.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4433178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44331782015-05-27 Reserve Design under Climate Change: From Land Facets Back to Ecosystem Representation Schneider, Richard R. Bayne, Erin M. PLoS One Research Article Ecosystem distributions are expected to shift as a result of global warming, raising concerns about the long-term utility of reserve systems based on coarse-filter ecosystem representation. We tested the extent to which proportional ecosystem representation targets would be maintained under a changing climate by projecting the distribution of the major ecosystems of Alberta, Canada, into the future using bioclimatic envelope models and then calculating the composition of reserves in successive periods. We used the Marxan conservation planning software to generate the suite of reserve systems for our test, varying the representation target and degree of reserve clumping. Our climate envelope projections for the 2080s indicate that virtually all reserves will, in time, be comprised of different ecosystem types than today. Nevertheless, our proportional targets for ecosystem representation were maintained across all time periods, with only minor exceptions. We hypothesize that this stability in representation arises because ecosystems may be serving as proxies for land facets, the stable abiotic landscape features that delineate major arenas of biological activity. The implication is that accommodating climate change may not require abandoning the conventional ecosystem-based approach to reserve design in favour of a strictly abiotic approach, since the two approaches may be largely synonymous. Public Library of Science 2015-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4433178/ /pubmed/25978759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126918 Text en © 2015 Schneider, Bayne http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schneider, Richard R.
Bayne, Erin M.
Reserve Design under Climate Change: From Land Facets Back to Ecosystem Representation
title Reserve Design under Climate Change: From Land Facets Back to Ecosystem Representation
title_full Reserve Design under Climate Change: From Land Facets Back to Ecosystem Representation
title_fullStr Reserve Design under Climate Change: From Land Facets Back to Ecosystem Representation
title_full_unstemmed Reserve Design under Climate Change: From Land Facets Back to Ecosystem Representation
title_short Reserve Design under Climate Change: From Land Facets Back to Ecosystem Representation
title_sort reserve design under climate change: from land facets back to ecosystem representation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25978759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126918
work_keys_str_mv AT schneiderrichardr reservedesignunderclimatechangefromlandfacetsbacktoecosystemrepresentation
AT bayneerinm reservedesignunderclimatechangefromlandfacetsbacktoecosystemrepresentation