Cargando…

Diversity of sexual systems within different lineages of the genus Silene

Species and populations can be categorized by their sexual systems, depending on the spatial distribution of female and male reproductive structures within and among plants. Although a high diversity of sexual systems exists in Silene, their relative frequency at the genus and infrageneric level is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casimiro-Soriguer, Inés, Buide, Maria L., Narbona, Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25862920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv037
_version_ 1782371639901552640
author Casimiro-Soriguer, Inés
Buide, Maria L.
Narbona, Eduardo
author_facet Casimiro-Soriguer, Inés
Buide, Maria L.
Narbona, Eduardo
author_sort Casimiro-Soriguer, Inés
collection PubMed
description Species and populations can be categorized by their sexual systems, depending on the spatial distribution of female and male reproductive structures within and among plants. Although a high diversity of sexual systems exists in Silene, their relative frequency at the genus and infrageneric level is unknown. Here, we carried out an extensive literature search for direct or indirect descriptions of sexual systems in Silene species. We found descriptions of sexual systems for 98 Silene species, where 63 and 35 correspond to the phylogenetically supported subgenera Silene and Behenantha, respectively. Hermaphroditism was the commonest sexual system (58.2 %), followed by dioecy (14.3 %), gynodioecy (13.3 %) and gynodioecy–gynomonoecy (i.e. hermaphroditic, female and gynomonoecious plants coexisting in the same population; 12.2 %). The presence of these sexual systems in both subgenera suggests their multiple origins. In 17 species, the description of sexual systems varied, and in most cases these differences corresponded to variations within or among populations. Interestingly, the poorly studied gynodioecy–gynomonoecy sexual system showed similar frequency to dioecy and gynodioecy in both subgenera. In addition, the incidence of gynodioecy–gynomonoecy was analysed in the species of section Psammophilae (Silene littorea, S. psammitis, S. adscendens and S. cambessedesii), in a survey of 26 populations across the distribution area of the species. The four species showed gynomonoecy–gynodioecy in most populations. Hermaphrodites were the most frequent morph, with a low number of females and gynomonoecious plants in all populations. The frequency of sexual morphs varied significantly among the studied populations but not among species. Female plants generally produced smaller numbers of flowers than hermaphroditic or gynomonoecious plants, and the percentages of female flowers per population were low. All these findings suggest that the gynodioecious–gynomonoecious sexual system in section Psammophilae is closer to hermaphroditism or gynomonoecy than gynodioecy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4433491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44334912015-05-28 Diversity of sexual systems within different lineages of the genus Silene Casimiro-Soriguer, Inés Buide, Maria L. Narbona, Eduardo AoB Plants Research Articles Species and populations can be categorized by their sexual systems, depending on the spatial distribution of female and male reproductive structures within and among plants. Although a high diversity of sexual systems exists in Silene, their relative frequency at the genus and infrageneric level is unknown. Here, we carried out an extensive literature search for direct or indirect descriptions of sexual systems in Silene species. We found descriptions of sexual systems for 98 Silene species, where 63 and 35 correspond to the phylogenetically supported subgenera Silene and Behenantha, respectively. Hermaphroditism was the commonest sexual system (58.2 %), followed by dioecy (14.3 %), gynodioecy (13.3 %) and gynodioecy–gynomonoecy (i.e. hermaphroditic, female and gynomonoecious plants coexisting in the same population; 12.2 %). The presence of these sexual systems in both subgenera suggests their multiple origins. In 17 species, the description of sexual systems varied, and in most cases these differences corresponded to variations within or among populations. Interestingly, the poorly studied gynodioecy–gynomonoecy sexual system showed similar frequency to dioecy and gynodioecy in both subgenera. In addition, the incidence of gynodioecy–gynomonoecy was analysed in the species of section Psammophilae (Silene littorea, S. psammitis, S. adscendens and S. cambessedesii), in a survey of 26 populations across the distribution area of the species. The four species showed gynomonoecy–gynodioecy in most populations. Hermaphrodites were the most frequent morph, with a low number of females and gynomonoecious plants in all populations. The frequency of sexual morphs varied significantly among the studied populations but not among species. Female plants generally produced smaller numbers of flowers than hermaphroditic or gynomonoecious plants, and the percentages of female flowers per population were low. All these findings suggest that the gynodioecious–gynomonoecious sexual system in section Psammophilae is closer to hermaphroditism or gynomonoecy than gynodioecy. Oxford University Press 2015-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4433491/ /pubmed/25862920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv037 Text en Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Casimiro-Soriguer, Inés
Buide, Maria L.
Narbona, Eduardo
Diversity of sexual systems within different lineages of the genus Silene
title Diversity of sexual systems within different lineages of the genus Silene
title_full Diversity of sexual systems within different lineages of the genus Silene
title_fullStr Diversity of sexual systems within different lineages of the genus Silene
title_full_unstemmed Diversity of sexual systems within different lineages of the genus Silene
title_short Diversity of sexual systems within different lineages of the genus Silene
title_sort diversity of sexual systems within different lineages of the genus silene
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25862920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv037
work_keys_str_mv AT casimirosoriguerines diversityofsexualsystemswithindifferentlineagesofthegenussilene
AT buidemarial diversityofsexualsystemswithindifferentlineagesofthegenussilene
AT narbonaeduardo diversityofsexualsystemswithindifferentlineagesofthegenussilene