Cargando…
Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System
To find the potential reasons for the discrepancies in the drug susceptibility test (DST) of M. tuberculosis isolates, twenty paired isolates with disputed drug susceptibilities to isoniazid (INH) were selected according to the MGIT960 testing and Löwenstein-Jensen (L-J) proportion methods. Their MI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26064938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/651980 |
_version_ | 1782371645324787712 |
---|---|
author | Mei, Zaoxian Sun, Zhaogang Bai, Dapeng Xu, Yuhui Li, Zhiling Huang, Hairong Li, Chuanyou Xu, Shaofa Li, Li |
author_facet | Mei, Zaoxian Sun, Zhaogang Bai, Dapeng Xu, Yuhui Li, Zhiling Huang, Hairong Li, Chuanyou Xu, Shaofa Li, Li |
author_sort | Mei, Zaoxian |
collection | PubMed |
description | To find the potential reasons for the discrepancies in the drug susceptibility test (DST) of M. tuberculosis isolates, twenty paired isolates with disputed drug susceptibilities to isoniazid (INH) were selected according to the MGIT960 testing and Löwenstein-Jensen (L-J) proportion methods. Their MICs were confirmed again by broth microdilution method and by L-J proportion method. The spoligotyping results showed that, of all the 20 paired strains, 11 paired isolates belonged to the Beijing genotype and 6 paired isolates belonged to SIT1634, and that each of the remaining 3 paired isolates had two genotypes, namely, SIT1 and SIT1634. Those 3 paired isolates with different intrapair spoligotypes were further confirmed as mixed infection by the results that those three pairs of isolates with different 12 locus MIRU intrapair types and one pair carried different base pair at codon 315 (AGC versus AAC). Totally mutations in the katG gene were identified in 13 paired isolates. No mutations were found in the regulatory sequences and open reading frames (ORF) of the inhA and ahpC genes in any of the tested isolates. Those results showed that the different test systems and the mixed infection with particular genotypes of M. tuberculosis strains contributed to the drug susceptibility discrepancies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4433640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44336402015-06-10 Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System Mei, Zaoxian Sun, Zhaogang Bai, Dapeng Xu, Yuhui Li, Zhiling Huang, Hairong Li, Chuanyou Xu, Shaofa Li, Li Biomed Res Int Research Article To find the potential reasons for the discrepancies in the drug susceptibility test (DST) of M. tuberculosis isolates, twenty paired isolates with disputed drug susceptibilities to isoniazid (INH) were selected according to the MGIT960 testing and Löwenstein-Jensen (L-J) proportion methods. Their MICs were confirmed again by broth microdilution method and by L-J proportion method. The spoligotyping results showed that, of all the 20 paired strains, 11 paired isolates belonged to the Beijing genotype and 6 paired isolates belonged to SIT1634, and that each of the remaining 3 paired isolates had two genotypes, namely, SIT1 and SIT1634. Those 3 paired isolates with different intrapair spoligotypes were further confirmed as mixed infection by the results that those three pairs of isolates with different 12 locus MIRU intrapair types and one pair carried different base pair at codon 315 (AGC versus AAC). Totally mutations in the katG gene were identified in 13 paired isolates. No mutations were found in the regulatory sequences and open reading frames (ORF) of the inhA and ahpC genes in any of the tested isolates. Those results showed that the different test systems and the mixed infection with particular genotypes of M. tuberculosis strains contributed to the drug susceptibility discrepancies. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4433640/ /pubmed/26064938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/651980 Text en Copyright © 2015 Zaoxian Mei et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mei, Zaoxian Sun, Zhaogang Bai, Dapeng Xu, Yuhui Li, Zhiling Huang, Hairong Li, Chuanyou Xu, Shaofa Li, Li Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System |
title | Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System |
title_full | Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System |
title_fullStr | Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System |
title_full_unstemmed | Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System |
title_short | Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System |
title_sort | discrepancies in drug susceptibility test for tuberculosis patients resulted from the mixed infection and the testing system |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26064938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/651980 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meizaoxian discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem AT sunzhaogang discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem AT baidapeng discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem AT xuyuhui discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem AT lizhiling discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem AT huanghairong discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem AT lichuanyou discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem AT xushaofa discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem AT lili discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem |