Cargando…

Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System

To find the potential reasons for the discrepancies in the drug susceptibility test (DST) of M. tuberculosis isolates, twenty paired isolates with disputed drug susceptibilities to isoniazid (INH) were selected according to the MGIT960 testing and Löwenstein-Jensen (L-J) proportion methods. Their MI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mei, Zaoxian, Sun, Zhaogang, Bai, Dapeng, Xu, Yuhui, Li, Zhiling, Huang, Hairong, Li, Chuanyou, Xu, Shaofa, Li, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26064938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/651980
_version_ 1782371645324787712
author Mei, Zaoxian
Sun, Zhaogang
Bai, Dapeng
Xu, Yuhui
Li, Zhiling
Huang, Hairong
Li, Chuanyou
Xu, Shaofa
Li, Li
author_facet Mei, Zaoxian
Sun, Zhaogang
Bai, Dapeng
Xu, Yuhui
Li, Zhiling
Huang, Hairong
Li, Chuanyou
Xu, Shaofa
Li, Li
author_sort Mei, Zaoxian
collection PubMed
description To find the potential reasons for the discrepancies in the drug susceptibility test (DST) of M. tuberculosis isolates, twenty paired isolates with disputed drug susceptibilities to isoniazid (INH) were selected according to the MGIT960 testing and Löwenstein-Jensen (L-J) proportion methods. Their MICs were confirmed again by broth microdilution method and by L-J proportion method. The spoligotyping results showed that, of all the 20 paired strains, 11 paired isolates belonged to the Beijing genotype and 6 paired isolates belonged to SIT1634, and that each of the remaining 3 paired isolates had two genotypes, namely, SIT1 and SIT1634. Those 3 paired isolates with different intrapair spoligotypes were further confirmed as mixed infection by the results that those three pairs of isolates with different 12 locus MIRU intrapair types and one pair carried different base pair at codon 315 (AGC versus AAC). Totally mutations in the katG gene were identified in 13 paired isolates. No mutations were found in the regulatory sequences and open reading frames (ORF) of the inhA and ahpC genes in any of the tested isolates. Those results showed that the different test systems and the mixed infection with particular genotypes of M. tuberculosis strains contributed to the drug susceptibility discrepancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4433640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44336402015-06-10 Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System Mei, Zaoxian Sun, Zhaogang Bai, Dapeng Xu, Yuhui Li, Zhiling Huang, Hairong Li, Chuanyou Xu, Shaofa Li, Li Biomed Res Int Research Article To find the potential reasons for the discrepancies in the drug susceptibility test (DST) of M. tuberculosis isolates, twenty paired isolates with disputed drug susceptibilities to isoniazid (INH) were selected according to the MGIT960 testing and Löwenstein-Jensen (L-J) proportion methods. Their MICs were confirmed again by broth microdilution method and by L-J proportion method. The spoligotyping results showed that, of all the 20 paired strains, 11 paired isolates belonged to the Beijing genotype and 6 paired isolates belonged to SIT1634, and that each of the remaining 3 paired isolates had two genotypes, namely, SIT1 and SIT1634. Those 3 paired isolates with different intrapair spoligotypes were further confirmed as mixed infection by the results that those three pairs of isolates with different 12 locus MIRU intrapair types and one pair carried different base pair at codon 315 (AGC versus AAC). Totally mutations in the katG gene were identified in 13 paired isolates. No mutations were found in the regulatory sequences and open reading frames (ORF) of the inhA and ahpC genes in any of the tested isolates. Those results showed that the different test systems and the mixed infection with particular genotypes of M. tuberculosis strains contributed to the drug susceptibility discrepancies. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4433640/ /pubmed/26064938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/651980 Text en Copyright © 2015 Zaoxian Mei et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mei, Zaoxian
Sun, Zhaogang
Bai, Dapeng
Xu, Yuhui
Li, Zhiling
Huang, Hairong
Li, Chuanyou
Xu, Shaofa
Li, Li
Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System
title Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System
title_full Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System
title_fullStr Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System
title_short Discrepancies in Drug Susceptibility Test for Tuberculosis Patients Resulted from the Mixed Infection and the Testing System
title_sort discrepancies in drug susceptibility test for tuberculosis patients resulted from the mixed infection and the testing system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26064938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/651980
work_keys_str_mv AT meizaoxian discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem
AT sunzhaogang discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem
AT baidapeng discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem
AT xuyuhui discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem
AT lizhiling discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem
AT huanghairong discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem
AT lichuanyou discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem
AT xushaofa discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem
AT lili discrepanciesindrugsusceptibilitytestfortuberculosispatientsresultedfromthemixedinfectionandthetestingsystem