Cargando…

German Bowel Cancer Center: An Attempt to Improve Treatment Quality

Background. Colorectal cancer remains the second most common cause of death from malignancies, but treatment results show high diversity. Certified bowel cancer centres (BCC) are the basis of a German project for improvement of treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze if certification would e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jannasch, Olof, Udelnow, Andrej, Wolff, Stefanie, Lippert, Hans, Mroczkowski, Pawel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26064091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/456476
_version_ 1782371658976198656
author Jannasch, Olof
Udelnow, Andrej
Wolff, Stefanie
Lippert, Hans
Mroczkowski, Pawel
author_facet Jannasch, Olof
Udelnow, Andrej
Wolff, Stefanie
Lippert, Hans
Mroczkowski, Pawel
author_sort Jannasch, Olof
collection PubMed
description Background. Colorectal cancer remains the second most common cause of death from malignancies, but treatment results show high diversity. Certified bowel cancer centres (BCC) are the basis of a German project for improvement of treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze if certification would enhance short-term outcome in rectal cancer surgery. Material and Methods. This quality assurance study included 8197 patients with rectal cancer treated between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2010. We compared cohorts treated in certified and noncertified hospitals regarding preoperative variables and perioperative outcomes. Outcomes were verified by matched-pair analysis. Results. Patients of noncertified hospitals had higher ASA-scores, higher prevalence of risk factors, more distant metastases, lower tumour localization, lower frequency of pelvic MRI, and higher frequencies of missing values and undetermined TNM classifications (significant differences only). Outcome analysis revealed more general complications in certified hospitals (20.3% versus 17.4%, p = 0.03). Both cohorts did not differ significantly in percentage of R0-resections, intraoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, in-hospital death, and abdominal wall dehiscence. Conclusions. The concept of BCC is a step towards improving the structural and procedural quality. This is a good basis for improving outcome quality but cannot replace it. For a primary surgical disease like rectal cancer a specific, surgery-targeted program is still needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4433698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44336982015-06-10 German Bowel Cancer Center: An Attempt to Improve Treatment Quality Jannasch, Olof Udelnow, Andrej Wolff, Stefanie Lippert, Hans Mroczkowski, Pawel Gastroenterol Res Pract Research Article Background. Colorectal cancer remains the second most common cause of death from malignancies, but treatment results show high diversity. Certified bowel cancer centres (BCC) are the basis of a German project for improvement of treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze if certification would enhance short-term outcome in rectal cancer surgery. Material and Methods. This quality assurance study included 8197 patients with rectal cancer treated between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2010. We compared cohorts treated in certified and noncertified hospitals regarding preoperative variables and perioperative outcomes. Outcomes were verified by matched-pair analysis. Results. Patients of noncertified hospitals had higher ASA-scores, higher prevalence of risk factors, more distant metastases, lower tumour localization, lower frequency of pelvic MRI, and higher frequencies of missing values and undetermined TNM classifications (significant differences only). Outcome analysis revealed more general complications in certified hospitals (20.3% versus 17.4%, p = 0.03). Both cohorts did not differ significantly in percentage of R0-resections, intraoperative complications, anastomotic leakage, in-hospital death, and abdominal wall dehiscence. Conclusions. The concept of BCC is a step towards improving the structural and procedural quality. This is a good basis for improving outcome quality but cannot replace it. For a primary surgical disease like rectal cancer a specific, surgery-targeted program is still needed. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4433698/ /pubmed/26064091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/456476 Text en Copyright © 2015 Olof Jannasch et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jannasch, Olof
Udelnow, Andrej
Wolff, Stefanie
Lippert, Hans
Mroczkowski, Pawel
German Bowel Cancer Center: An Attempt to Improve Treatment Quality
title German Bowel Cancer Center: An Attempt to Improve Treatment Quality
title_full German Bowel Cancer Center: An Attempt to Improve Treatment Quality
title_fullStr German Bowel Cancer Center: An Attempt to Improve Treatment Quality
title_full_unstemmed German Bowel Cancer Center: An Attempt to Improve Treatment Quality
title_short German Bowel Cancer Center: An Attempt to Improve Treatment Quality
title_sort german bowel cancer center: an attempt to improve treatment quality
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26064091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/456476
work_keys_str_mv AT jannascholof germanbowelcancercenteranattempttoimprovetreatmentquality
AT udelnowandrej germanbowelcancercenteranattempttoimprovetreatmentquality
AT wolffstefanie germanbowelcancercenteranattempttoimprovetreatmentquality
AT lipperthans germanbowelcancercenteranattempttoimprovetreatmentquality
AT mroczkowskipawel germanbowelcancercenteranattempttoimprovetreatmentquality