Cargando…

Comparison of the performances of four hydrophilic polymers as supports for lipase immobilisation

Four hydrophilic polymers in the form of beads – chitosan, alginate, alginate/polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and chitosan-coated alginate – were used as supports for lipase immobilisation. Hydrogel beads were characterised by bead-size-distribution estimation, surface morphology studies, and polymer inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toscano, Lydia, Montero, Gisela, Stoytcheva, Margarita, Cervantes, Lourdes, Gochev, Velizar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26019488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2014.901684
_version_ 1782371695591424000
author Toscano, Lydia
Montero, Gisela
Stoytcheva, Margarita
Cervantes, Lourdes
Gochev, Velizar
author_facet Toscano, Lydia
Montero, Gisela
Stoytcheva, Margarita
Cervantes, Lourdes
Gochev, Velizar
author_sort Toscano, Lydia
collection PubMed
description Four hydrophilic polymers in the form of beads – chitosan, alginate, alginate/polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and chitosan-coated alginate – were used as supports for lipase immobilisation. Hydrogel beads were characterised by bead-size-distribution estimation, surface morphology studies, and polymer interactions assessment. Matrix performances – loading efficiency, immobilisation yield, enzyme activity, and stability retention – were evaluated and compared. Although the loading efficiency of the chitosan-coated Ca-alginate beads (79.8%) was inferior to that of the Ca-alginate (87%) and of the Ca-alginate/PVA beads (81.3%), their enzyme immobilisation yield (63.96%) was the most important. Moreover, lipase encapsulated in chitosan-coated Ca-alginate beads demonstrated better pH, thermal, and storage (89% residual activity after 30 days) stabilities. Immobilised lipase activity also increased in the order: alginate/PVA > chitosan > alginate > alginate/chitosan, and displayed a maximum at pH 8 and at temperatures of 45 °C (chitosan and Ca-alginate/PVA beads) and 50 °C (Ca-alginate and chitosan-coated Ca-alginate beads). Thus, chitosan-coated Ca-alginate beads could be considered as a suitable support for lipase immobilisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4433960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44339602015-05-25 Comparison of the performances of four hydrophilic polymers as supports for lipase immobilisation Toscano, Lydia Montero, Gisela Stoytcheva, Margarita Cervantes, Lourdes Gochev, Velizar Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip Articles; Agriculture & Environmental Biotechnology Four hydrophilic polymers in the form of beads – chitosan, alginate, alginate/polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and chitosan-coated alginate – were used as supports for lipase immobilisation. Hydrogel beads were characterised by bead-size-distribution estimation, surface morphology studies, and polymer interactions assessment. Matrix performances – loading efficiency, immobilisation yield, enzyme activity, and stability retention – were evaluated and compared. Although the loading efficiency of the chitosan-coated Ca-alginate beads (79.8%) was inferior to that of the Ca-alginate (87%) and of the Ca-alginate/PVA beads (81.3%), their enzyme immobilisation yield (63.96%) was the most important. Moreover, lipase encapsulated in chitosan-coated Ca-alginate beads demonstrated better pH, thermal, and storage (89% residual activity after 30 days) stabilities. Immobilised lipase activity also increased in the order: alginate/PVA > chitosan > alginate > alginate/chitosan, and displayed a maximum at pH 8 and at temperatures of 45 °C (chitosan and Ca-alginate/PVA beads) and 50 °C (Ca-alginate and chitosan-coated Ca-alginate beads). Thus, chitosan-coated Ca-alginate beads could be considered as a suitable support for lipase immobilisation. Taylor & Francis 2014-01-02 2014-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4433960/ /pubmed/26019488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2014.901684 Text en © 2014 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.
spellingShingle Articles; Agriculture & Environmental Biotechnology
Toscano, Lydia
Montero, Gisela
Stoytcheva, Margarita
Cervantes, Lourdes
Gochev, Velizar
Comparison of the performances of four hydrophilic polymers as supports for lipase immobilisation
title Comparison of the performances of four hydrophilic polymers as supports for lipase immobilisation
title_full Comparison of the performances of four hydrophilic polymers as supports for lipase immobilisation
title_fullStr Comparison of the performances of four hydrophilic polymers as supports for lipase immobilisation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the performances of four hydrophilic polymers as supports for lipase immobilisation
title_short Comparison of the performances of four hydrophilic polymers as supports for lipase immobilisation
title_sort comparison of the performances of four hydrophilic polymers as supports for lipase immobilisation
topic Articles; Agriculture & Environmental Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4433960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26019488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2014.901684
work_keys_str_mv AT toscanolydia comparisonoftheperformancesoffourhydrophilicpolymersassupportsforlipaseimmobilisation
AT monterogisela comparisonoftheperformancesoffourhydrophilicpolymersassupportsforlipaseimmobilisation
AT stoytchevamargarita comparisonoftheperformancesoffourhydrophilicpolymersassupportsforlipaseimmobilisation
AT cervanteslourdes comparisonoftheperformancesoffourhydrophilicpolymersassupportsforlipaseimmobilisation
AT gochevvelizar comparisonoftheperformancesoffourhydrophilicpolymersassupportsforlipaseimmobilisation