Cargando…

Comparison of Microleakage under Rebonded Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets Using Two Methods of Adhesive Removal: Sandblast and Laser

OBJECTIVES: Debonding is a common occurrence in orthodontic treatment and a considerable number of orthodontists prefer to rebond the detached brackets because of economic issues. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage beneath rebonded stainless steel brackets using two methods of adh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tudehzaeim, Mohamad Hossein, Yassaei, Soghra, Taherimoghadam, Shohreh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4434125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056521
_version_ 1782371729756127232
author Tudehzaeim, Mohamad Hossein
Yassaei, Soghra
Taherimoghadam, Shohreh
author_facet Tudehzaeim, Mohamad Hossein
Yassaei, Soghra
Taherimoghadam, Shohreh
author_sort Tudehzaeim, Mohamad Hossein
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Debonding is a common occurrence in orthodontic treatment and a considerable number of orthodontists prefer to rebond the detached brackets because of economic issues. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage beneath rebonded stainless steel brackets using two methods of adhesive removal namely sandblast and laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty human premolar teeth were randomly divided into three groups. Following bonding the brackets, group 1 served as the control group. Brackets in groups 2 and 3 were debonded, and adhesive removal from the bracket bases was done by means of sandblasting and Er-YAG laser, respectively. After rebonding, teeth in each group were stained with 2% methylene blue for 24 hours, sectioned and examined under a stereomicroscope. Marginal microleakage at the adhesive-enamel and bracket-adhesive interfaces in the occlusal and gingival margins was determined. Statistical analysis was done using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Comparison of the microleakage scores among the three groups revealed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). At the enamel-adhesive interface, the gingival margins in all groups showed higher microleakage while in the adhesive-bracket interface, the occlusal margin exhibited greater microleakage. CONCLUSION: Er-YAG laser irradiation and sandblasting for adhesive removal from the debonded brackets yielded clinically acceptable microleakage scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4434125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44341252015-06-08 Comparison of Microleakage under Rebonded Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets Using Two Methods of Adhesive Removal: Sandblast and Laser Tudehzaeim, Mohamad Hossein Yassaei, Soghra Taherimoghadam, Shohreh J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: Debonding is a common occurrence in orthodontic treatment and a considerable number of orthodontists prefer to rebond the detached brackets because of economic issues. The aim of this study was to compare the microleakage beneath rebonded stainless steel brackets using two methods of adhesive removal namely sandblast and laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty human premolar teeth were randomly divided into three groups. Following bonding the brackets, group 1 served as the control group. Brackets in groups 2 and 3 were debonded, and adhesive removal from the bracket bases was done by means of sandblasting and Er-YAG laser, respectively. After rebonding, teeth in each group were stained with 2% methylene blue for 24 hours, sectioned and examined under a stereomicroscope. Marginal microleakage at the adhesive-enamel and bracket-adhesive interfaces in the occlusal and gingival margins was determined. Statistical analysis was done using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Comparison of the microleakage scores among the three groups revealed no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). At the enamel-adhesive interface, the gingival margins in all groups showed higher microleakage while in the adhesive-bracket interface, the occlusal margin exhibited greater microleakage. CONCLUSION: Er-YAG laser irradiation and sandblasting for adhesive removal from the debonded brackets yielded clinically acceptable microleakage scores. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015-02 2015-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4434125/ /pubmed/26056521 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tudehzaeim, Mohamad Hossein
Yassaei, Soghra
Taherimoghadam, Shohreh
Comparison of Microleakage under Rebonded Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets Using Two Methods of Adhesive Removal: Sandblast and Laser
title Comparison of Microleakage under Rebonded Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets Using Two Methods of Adhesive Removal: Sandblast and Laser
title_full Comparison of Microleakage under Rebonded Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets Using Two Methods of Adhesive Removal: Sandblast and Laser
title_fullStr Comparison of Microleakage under Rebonded Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets Using Two Methods of Adhesive Removal: Sandblast and Laser
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Microleakage under Rebonded Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets Using Two Methods of Adhesive Removal: Sandblast and Laser
title_short Comparison of Microleakage under Rebonded Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets Using Two Methods of Adhesive Removal: Sandblast and Laser
title_sort comparison of microleakage under rebonded stainless steel orthodontic brackets using two methods of adhesive removal: sandblast and laser
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4434125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056521
work_keys_str_mv AT tudehzaeimmohamadhossein comparisonofmicroleakageunderrebondedstainlesssteelorthodonticbracketsusingtwomethodsofadhesiveremovalsandblastandlaser
AT yassaeisoghra comparisonofmicroleakageunderrebondedstainlesssteelorthodonticbracketsusingtwomethodsofadhesiveremovalsandblastandlaser
AT taherimoghadamshohreh comparisonofmicroleakageunderrebondedstainlesssteelorthodonticbracketsusingtwomethodsofadhesiveremovalsandblastandlaser