Cargando…

Vancomycin continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion during continuous venovenous hemofiltration: slow and steady may win the race

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is either administered by intermittent infusion (II) or continuous infusion (CI). In this patient population, the best method to rapidly achieve target serum concentrations of 15 mcg/ml to 25 mcg/ml remains to be elucidated. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Hsin, Bukovskaya, Yana, De Moya, Marc, Lee, Jarone, Schmidt, Ulrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4434240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25995967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-015-0048-x
_version_ 1782371752378105856
author Lin, Hsin
Bukovskaya, Yana
De Moya, Marc
Lee, Jarone
Schmidt, Ulrich
author_facet Lin, Hsin
Bukovskaya, Yana
De Moya, Marc
Lee, Jarone
Schmidt, Ulrich
author_sort Lin, Hsin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vancomycin during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is either administered by intermittent infusion (II) or continuous infusion (CI). In this patient population, the best method to rapidly achieve target serum concentrations of 15 mcg/ml to 25 mcg/ml remains to be elucidated. We hypothesized that CI would achieve a target serum level of 15 mcg/ml to 25 mcg/ml within 24 h of the initiation of therapy more consistently than II. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between 2011 and 2014 receiving intravenous vancomycin with 24-hour serum level while on CVVH was included. Patients were excluded from this review if they had residual renal function during CVVH, were concomitantly on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or if the first dose of vancomycin was received six or more hours prior to the initiation of CVVH. The primary outcome was the achievement of a therapeutic level of 15mcg/ml to 25 mcg/ml by 24 hours. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria and 14 received CI and 45 in II. Therapeutic 24-hour levels were achieved in 14/14 versus 2/45 in CI and II, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean 24-hour vancomycin levels were 20.35 ± 2.78 mcg/ml for CI compared to 9.7 ± 3.52 mcg/ml for II (p < 0.001). Mean loading dose was 26.65 ± 3.06 mg/kg for CI compared to 17.58 ± 5.72 mg/kg for II (p < 0.001). Daily maintenance doses were 15.66 ± 6.26 mg/kg for CI compared to 17.28 ± 4.96 mg/kg for II (p = 0.339). In the subgroup of 27 patients who received vancomycin-loading dose >20 mg/kg, mean 24-hour levels were 20.35 ± 2.78 mcg/ml for CI versus 11.8 ± 2.7 mcg/ml for II (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between patients in the two groups with respect to CVVH rate and length of CVVH prior to vancomycin administration. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that critically ill patients on CVVH treated with CI achieved the target level faster than II and consistently keep the vancomycin level within target range.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4434240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44342402015-05-20 Vancomycin continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion during continuous venovenous hemofiltration: slow and steady may win the race Lin, Hsin Bukovskaya, Yana De Moya, Marc Lee, Jarone Schmidt, Ulrich Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Vancomycin during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is either administered by intermittent infusion (II) or continuous infusion (CI). In this patient population, the best method to rapidly achieve target serum concentrations of 15 mcg/ml to 25 mcg/ml remains to be elucidated. We hypothesized that CI would achieve a target serum level of 15 mcg/ml to 25 mcg/ml within 24 h of the initiation of therapy more consistently than II. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between 2011 and 2014 receiving intravenous vancomycin with 24-hour serum level while on CVVH was included. Patients were excluded from this review if they had residual renal function during CVVH, were concomitantly on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or if the first dose of vancomycin was received six or more hours prior to the initiation of CVVH. The primary outcome was the achievement of a therapeutic level of 15mcg/ml to 25 mcg/ml by 24 hours. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria and 14 received CI and 45 in II. Therapeutic 24-hour levels were achieved in 14/14 versus 2/45 in CI and II, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean 24-hour vancomycin levels were 20.35 ± 2.78 mcg/ml for CI compared to 9.7 ± 3.52 mcg/ml for II (p < 0.001). Mean loading dose was 26.65 ± 3.06 mg/kg for CI compared to 17.58 ± 5.72 mg/kg for II (p < 0.001). Daily maintenance doses were 15.66 ± 6.26 mg/kg for CI compared to 17.28 ± 4.96 mg/kg for II (p = 0.339). In the subgroup of 27 patients who received vancomycin-loading dose >20 mg/kg, mean 24-hour levels were 20.35 ± 2.78 mcg/ml for CI versus 11.8 ± 2.7 mcg/ml for II (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found between patients in the two groups with respect to CVVH rate and length of CVVH prior to vancomycin administration. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that critically ill patients on CVVH treated with CI achieved the target level faster than II and consistently keep the vancomycin level within target range. Springer Paris 2015-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4434240/ /pubmed/25995967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-015-0048-x Text en © Lin et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Lin, Hsin
Bukovskaya, Yana
De Moya, Marc
Lee, Jarone
Schmidt, Ulrich
Vancomycin continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion during continuous venovenous hemofiltration: slow and steady may win the race
title Vancomycin continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion during continuous venovenous hemofiltration: slow and steady may win the race
title_full Vancomycin continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion during continuous venovenous hemofiltration: slow and steady may win the race
title_fullStr Vancomycin continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion during continuous venovenous hemofiltration: slow and steady may win the race
title_full_unstemmed Vancomycin continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion during continuous venovenous hemofiltration: slow and steady may win the race
title_short Vancomycin continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion during continuous venovenous hemofiltration: slow and steady may win the race
title_sort vancomycin continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion during continuous venovenous hemofiltration: slow and steady may win the race
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4434240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25995967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-015-0048-x
work_keys_str_mv AT linhsin vancomycincontinuousinfusionversusintermittentinfusionduringcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationslowandsteadymaywintherace
AT bukovskayayana vancomycincontinuousinfusionversusintermittentinfusionduringcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationslowandsteadymaywintherace
AT demoyamarc vancomycincontinuousinfusionversusintermittentinfusionduringcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationslowandsteadymaywintherace
AT leejarone vancomycincontinuousinfusionversusintermittentinfusionduringcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationslowandsteadymaywintherace
AT schmidtulrich vancomycincontinuousinfusionversusintermittentinfusionduringcontinuousvenovenoushemofiltrationslowandsteadymaywintherace