Cargando…
Evaluating the effects of protective ventilation on organ-specific cytokine production in porcine experimental postoperative sepsis
BACKGROUND: Protective ventilation with lower tidal volume (V(T)) and higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) reduces the negative additive effects of mechanical ventilation during systemic inflammatory response syndrome. We hypothesised that protective ventilation during surgery would affect...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4434882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25958003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0052-9 |
_version_ | 1782371815653376000 |
---|---|
author | Sperber, Jesper Lipcsey, Miklós Larsson, Anders Larsson, Anders Sjölin, Jan Castegren, Markus |
author_facet | Sperber, Jesper Lipcsey, Miklós Larsson, Anders Larsson, Anders Sjölin, Jan Castegren, Markus |
author_sort | Sperber, Jesper |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Protective ventilation with lower tidal volume (V(T)) and higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) reduces the negative additive effects of mechanical ventilation during systemic inflammatory response syndrome. We hypothesised that protective ventilation during surgery would affect the organ-specific immune response in an experimental animal model of endotoxin-induced sepsis-like syndrome. METHODS: 30 pigs were laparotomised for 2 hours (h), after which a continuous endotoxin infusion was started at 0.25 micrograms × kg(−1) × h(−1) for 5 h. Catheters were placed in the carotid artery, hepatic vein, portal vein and jugular bulb. Animals were randomised to two protective ventilation groups (n = 10 each): one group was ventilated with V(T) 6 mL × kg(−1) during the whole experiment while the other group was ventilated during the surgical phase with V(T) of 10 mL × kg(−1). In both groups PEEP was 5 cmH(2)O during surgery and increased to 10 cmH(2)O at the start of endotoxin infusion. A control group (n = 10) was ventilated with V(T) of 10 mL × kg(−1) and PEEP 5 cm H(2)0 throughout the experiment. In four sample locations we a) simultaneously compared cytokine levels, b) studied the effect of protective ventilation initiated before and during endotoxemia and c) evaluated protective ventilation on organ-specific cytokine levels. RESULTS: TNF-alpha levels were highest in the hepatic vein, IL-6 levels highest in the artery and jugular bulb and IL-10 levels lowest in the artery. Protective ventilation initiated before and during endotoxemia did not differ in organ-specific cytokine levels. Protective ventilation led to lower levels of TNF-alpha in the hepatic vein compared with the control group, whereas no significant differences were seen in the artery, portal vein or jugular bulb. CONCLUSIONS: Variation between organs in cytokine output was observed during experimental sepsis. We see no implication from cytokine levels for initiating protective ventilation before endotoxemia. However, during endotoxemia protective ventilation attenuates hepatic inflammatory cytokine output contributing to a reduced total inflammatory burden. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4434882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44348822015-05-19 Evaluating the effects of protective ventilation on organ-specific cytokine production in porcine experimental postoperative sepsis Sperber, Jesper Lipcsey, Miklós Larsson, Anders Larsson, Anders Sjölin, Jan Castegren, Markus BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Protective ventilation with lower tidal volume (V(T)) and higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) reduces the negative additive effects of mechanical ventilation during systemic inflammatory response syndrome. We hypothesised that protective ventilation during surgery would affect the organ-specific immune response in an experimental animal model of endotoxin-induced sepsis-like syndrome. METHODS: 30 pigs were laparotomised for 2 hours (h), after which a continuous endotoxin infusion was started at 0.25 micrograms × kg(−1) × h(−1) for 5 h. Catheters were placed in the carotid artery, hepatic vein, portal vein and jugular bulb. Animals were randomised to two protective ventilation groups (n = 10 each): one group was ventilated with V(T) 6 mL × kg(−1) during the whole experiment while the other group was ventilated during the surgical phase with V(T) of 10 mL × kg(−1). In both groups PEEP was 5 cmH(2)O during surgery and increased to 10 cmH(2)O at the start of endotoxin infusion. A control group (n = 10) was ventilated with V(T) of 10 mL × kg(−1) and PEEP 5 cm H(2)0 throughout the experiment. In four sample locations we a) simultaneously compared cytokine levels, b) studied the effect of protective ventilation initiated before and during endotoxemia and c) evaluated protective ventilation on organ-specific cytokine levels. RESULTS: TNF-alpha levels were highest in the hepatic vein, IL-6 levels highest in the artery and jugular bulb and IL-10 levels lowest in the artery. Protective ventilation initiated before and during endotoxemia did not differ in organ-specific cytokine levels. Protective ventilation led to lower levels of TNF-alpha in the hepatic vein compared with the control group, whereas no significant differences were seen in the artery, portal vein or jugular bulb. CONCLUSIONS: Variation between organs in cytokine output was observed during experimental sepsis. We see no implication from cytokine levels for initiating protective ventilation before endotoxemia. However, during endotoxemia protective ventilation attenuates hepatic inflammatory cytokine output contributing to a reduced total inflammatory burden. BioMed Central 2015-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4434882/ /pubmed/25958003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0052-9 Text en © Sperber et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sperber, Jesper Lipcsey, Miklós Larsson, Anders Larsson, Anders Sjölin, Jan Castegren, Markus Evaluating the effects of protective ventilation on organ-specific cytokine production in porcine experimental postoperative sepsis |
title | Evaluating the effects of protective ventilation on organ-specific cytokine production in porcine experimental postoperative sepsis |
title_full | Evaluating the effects of protective ventilation on organ-specific cytokine production in porcine experimental postoperative sepsis |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the effects of protective ventilation on organ-specific cytokine production in porcine experimental postoperative sepsis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the effects of protective ventilation on organ-specific cytokine production in porcine experimental postoperative sepsis |
title_short | Evaluating the effects of protective ventilation on organ-specific cytokine production in porcine experimental postoperative sepsis |
title_sort | evaluating the effects of protective ventilation on organ-specific cytokine production in porcine experimental postoperative sepsis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4434882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25958003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-015-0052-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sperberjesper evaluatingtheeffectsofprotectiveventilationonorganspecificcytokineproductioninporcineexperimentalpostoperativesepsis AT lipcseymiklos evaluatingtheeffectsofprotectiveventilationonorganspecificcytokineproductioninporcineexperimentalpostoperativesepsis AT larssonanders evaluatingtheeffectsofprotectiveventilationonorganspecificcytokineproductioninporcineexperimentalpostoperativesepsis AT larssonanders evaluatingtheeffectsofprotectiveventilationonorganspecificcytokineproductioninporcineexperimentalpostoperativesepsis AT sjolinjan evaluatingtheeffectsofprotectiveventilationonorganspecificcytokineproductioninporcineexperimentalpostoperativesepsis AT castegrenmarkus evaluatingtheeffectsofprotectiveventilationonorganspecificcytokineproductioninporcineexperimentalpostoperativesepsis |