Cargando…
Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: a randomised controlled trial
Given the importance of effective treatments for children with reading impairment, paired with growing concern about the lack of scientific replication in psychological science, the aim of this study was to replicate a quasi-randomised trial of sight word and phonics training using a randomised cont...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26019992 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.922 |
_version_ | 1782371925270462464 |
---|---|
author | McArthur, G Kohnen, S Jones, K Eve, P Banales, E Larsen, L Castles, A |
author_facet | McArthur, G Kohnen, S Jones, K Eve, P Banales, E Larsen, L Castles, A |
author_sort | McArthur, G |
collection | PubMed |
description | Given the importance of effective treatments for children with reading impairment, paired with growing concern about the lack of scientific replication in psychological science, the aim of this study was to replicate a quasi-randomised trial of sight word and phonics training using a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. One group of poor readers (N = 41) did 8 weeks of phonics training (i.e., phonological decoding) and then 8 weeks of sight word training (i.e., whole-word recognition). A second group did the reverse order of training. Sight word and phonics training each had a large and significant valid treatment effect on trained irregular words and word reading fluency. In addition, combined sight word and phonics training had a moderate and significant valid treatment effect on nonword reading accuracy and fluency. These findings demonstrate the reliability of both phonics and sight word training in treating poor readers in an era where the importance of scientific reliability is under close scrutiny. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4435451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44354512015-05-27 Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: a randomised controlled trial McArthur, G Kohnen, S Jones, K Eve, P Banales, E Larsen, L Castles, A PeerJ Clinical Trials Given the importance of effective treatments for children with reading impairment, paired with growing concern about the lack of scientific replication in psychological science, the aim of this study was to replicate a quasi-randomised trial of sight word and phonics training using a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. One group of poor readers (N = 41) did 8 weeks of phonics training (i.e., phonological decoding) and then 8 weeks of sight word training (i.e., whole-word recognition). A second group did the reverse order of training. Sight word and phonics training each had a large and significant valid treatment effect on trained irregular words and word reading fluency. In addition, combined sight word and phonics training had a moderate and significant valid treatment effect on nonword reading accuracy and fluency. These findings demonstrate the reliability of both phonics and sight word training in treating poor readers in an era where the importance of scientific reliability is under close scrutiny. PeerJ Inc. 2015-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4435451/ /pubmed/26019992 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.922 Text en © 2015 McArthur et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trials McArthur, G Kohnen, S Jones, K Eve, P Banales, E Larsen, L Castles, A Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: a randomised controlled trial |
title | Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Clinical Trials |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26019992 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.922 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcarthurg replicabilityofsightwordtrainingandphonicstraininginpoorreadersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kohnens replicabilityofsightwordtrainingandphonicstraininginpoorreadersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jonesk replicabilityofsightwordtrainingandphonicstraininginpoorreadersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT evep replicabilityofsightwordtrainingandphonicstraininginpoorreadersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT banalese replicabilityofsightwordtrainingandphonicstraininginpoorreadersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT larsenl replicabilityofsightwordtrainingandphonicstraininginpoorreadersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT castlesa replicabilityofsightwordtrainingandphonicstraininginpoorreadersarandomisedcontrolledtrial |