Cargando…
Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants
Previous research has shown that odorants consistently evoke associations with textures and their tactile properties like smoothness and roughness. Also, it has been observed that olfaction can modulate tactile perception. We therefore hypothesized that tactile roughness perception may be biased tow...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26020010 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.955 |
_version_ | 1782371928050237440 |
---|---|
author | Koijck, Lara A. Toet, Alexander Van Erp, Jan B.F. |
author_facet | Koijck, Lara A. Toet, Alexander Van Erp, Jan B.F. |
author_sort | Koijck, Lara A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous research has shown that odorants consistently evoke associations with textures and their tactile properties like smoothness and roughness. Also, it has been observed that olfaction can modulate tactile perception. We therefore hypothesized that tactile roughness perception may be biased towards the somatosensory connotation of an ambient odorant. We performed two experiments to test this hypothesis. In the first experiment, we investigated the influence of ambient chemosensory stimuli with different roughness connotations on tactile roughness perception. In addition to a pleasant odor with a connotation of softness (PEA), we also included a trigeminal stimulant with a rough, sharp or prickly connotation (Ethanol). We expected that—compared to a No-odorant control condition—tactile texture perception would be biased towards smoothness in the presence of PEA and towards roughness in the presence of Ethanol. However, our results show no significant interaction between chemosensory stimulation and perceived tactile surface roughness. It could be argued that ambient odors may be less effective in stimulating crossmodal associations, since they are by definition extraneous to the tactile stimuli. In an attempt to optimize the conditions for sensory integration, we therefore performed a second experiment in which the olfactory and tactile stimuli were presented in synchrony and in close spatial proximity. In addition, we included pleasant (Lemon) and unpleasant (Indole) odorants that are known to have the ability to affect tactile perception. We expected that tactile stimuli would be perceived as less rough when simultaneously presented with Lemon or PEA (both associated with softness) than when presented with Ethanol or Indole (odors that can be associated with roughness). Again, we found no significant main effect of chemosensory condition on perceived tactile roughness. We discuss the limitations of this study and we present suggestions for future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4435474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44354742015-05-27 Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants Koijck, Lara A. Toet, Alexander Van Erp, Jan B.F. PeerJ Neuroscience Previous research has shown that odorants consistently evoke associations with textures and their tactile properties like smoothness and roughness. Also, it has been observed that olfaction can modulate tactile perception. We therefore hypothesized that tactile roughness perception may be biased towards the somatosensory connotation of an ambient odorant. We performed two experiments to test this hypothesis. In the first experiment, we investigated the influence of ambient chemosensory stimuli with different roughness connotations on tactile roughness perception. In addition to a pleasant odor with a connotation of softness (PEA), we also included a trigeminal stimulant with a rough, sharp or prickly connotation (Ethanol). We expected that—compared to a No-odorant control condition—tactile texture perception would be biased towards smoothness in the presence of PEA and towards roughness in the presence of Ethanol. However, our results show no significant interaction between chemosensory stimulation and perceived tactile surface roughness. It could be argued that ambient odors may be less effective in stimulating crossmodal associations, since they are by definition extraneous to the tactile stimuli. In an attempt to optimize the conditions for sensory integration, we therefore performed a second experiment in which the olfactory and tactile stimuli were presented in synchrony and in close spatial proximity. In addition, we included pleasant (Lemon) and unpleasant (Indole) odorants that are known to have the ability to affect tactile perception. We expected that tactile stimuli would be perceived as less rough when simultaneously presented with Lemon or PEA (both associated with softness) than when presented with Ethanol or Indole (odors that can be associated with roughness). Again, we found no significant main effect of chemosensory condition on perceived tactile roughness. We discuss the limitations of this study and we present suggestions for future research. PeerJ Inc. 2015-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4435474/ /pubmed/26020010 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.955 Text en © 2015 Koijck et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Koijck, Lara A. Toet, Alexander Van Erp, Jan B.F. Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants |
title | Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants |
title_full | Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants |
title_fullStr | Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants |
title_full_unstemmed | Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants |
title_short | Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants |
title_sort | tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26020010 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.955 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koijcklaraa tactileroughnessperceptioninthepresenceofolfactoryandtrigeminalstimulants AT toetalexander tactileroughnessperceptioninthepresenceofolfactoryandtrigeminalstimulants AT vanerpjanbf tactileroughnessperceptioninthepresenceofolfactoryandtrigeminalstimulants |