Cargando…

Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants

Previous research has shown that odorants consistently evoke associations with textures and their tactile properties like smoothness and roughness. Also, it has been observed that olfaction can modulate tactile perception. We therefore hypothesized that tactile roughness perception may be biased tow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koijck, Lara A., Toet, Alexander, Van Erp, Jan B.F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26020010
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.955
_version_ 1782371928050237440
author Koijck, Lara A.
Toet, Alexander
Van Erp, Jan B.F.
author_facet Koijck, Lara A.
Toet, Alexander
Van Erp, Jan B.F.
author_sort Koijck, Lara A.
collection PubMed
description Previous research has shown that odorants consistently evoke associations with textures and their tactile properties like smoothness and roughness. Also, it has been observed that olfaction can modulate tactile perception. We therefore hypothesized that tactile roughness perception may be biased towards the somatosensory connotation of an ambient odorant. We performed two experiments to test this hypothesis. In the first experiment, we investigated the influence of ambient chemosensory stimuli with different roughness connotations on tactile roughness perception. In addition to a pleasant odor with a connotation of softness (PEA), we also included a trigeminal stimulant with a rough, sharp or prickly connotation (Ethanol). We expected that—compared to a No-odorant control condition—tactile texture perception would be biased towards smoothness in the presence of PEA and towards roughness in the presence of Ethanol. However, our results show no significant interaction between chemosensory stimulation and perceived tactile surface roughness. It could be argued that ambient odors may be less effective in stimulating crossmodal associations, since they are by definition extraneous to the tactile stimuli. In an attempt to optimize the conditions for sensory integration, we therefore performed a second experiment in which the olfactory and tactile stimuli were presented in synchrony and in close spatial proximity. In addition, we included pleasant (Lemon) and unpleasant (Indole) odorants that are known to have the ability to affect tactile perception. We expected that tactile stimuli would be perceived as less rough when simultaneously presented with Lemon or PEA (both associated with softness) than when presented with Ethanol or Indole (odors that can be associated with roughness). Again, we found no significant main effect of chemosensory condition on perceived tactile roughness. We discuss the limitations of this study and we present suggestions for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4435474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44354742015-05-27 Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants Koijck, Lara A. Toet, Alexander Van Erp, Jan B.F. PeerJ Neuroscience Previous research has shown that odorants consistently evoke associations with textures and their tactile properties like smoothness and roughness. Also, it has been observed that olfaction can modulate tactile perception. We therefore hypothesized that tactile roughness perception may be biased towards the somatosensory connotation of an ambient odorant. We performed two experiments to test this hypothesis. In the first experiment, we investigated the influence of ambient chemosensory stimuli with different roughness connotations on tactile roughness perception. In addition to a pleasant odor with a connotation of softness (PEA), we also included a trigeminal stimulant with a rough, sharp or prickly connotation (Ethanol). We expected that—compared to a No-odorant control condition—tactile texture perception would be biased towards smoothness in the presence of PEA and towards roughness in the presence of Ethanol. However, our results show no significant interaction between chemosensory stimulation and perceived tactile surface roughness. It could be argued that ambient odors may be less effective in stimulating crossmodal associations, since they are by definition extraneous to the tactile stimuli. In an attempt to optimize the conditions for sensory integration, we therefore performed a second experiment in which the olfactory and tactile stimuli were presented in synchrony and in close spatial proximity. In addition, we included pleasant (Lemon) and unpleasant (Indole) odorants that are known to have the ability to affect tactile perception. We expected that tactile stimuli would be perceived as less rough when simultaneously presented with Lemon or PEA (both associated with softness) than when presented with Ethanol or Indole (odors that can be associated with roughness). Again, we found no significant main effect of chemosensory condition on perceived tactile roughness. We discuss the limitations of this study and we present suggestions for future research. PeerJ Inc. 2015-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4435474/ /pubmed/26020010 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.955 Text en © 2015 Koijck et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Koijck, Lara A.
Toet, Alexander
Van Erp, Jan B.F.
Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants
title Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants
title_full Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants
title_fullStr Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants
title_full_unstemmed Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants
title_short Tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants
title_sort tactile roughness perception in the presence of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26020010
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.955
work_keys_str_mv AT koijcklaraa tactileroughnessperceptioninthepresenceofolfactoryandtrigeminalstimulants
AT toetalexander tactileroughnessperceptioninthepresenceofolfactoryandtrigeminalstimulants
AT vanerpjanbf tactileroughnessperceptioninthepresenceofolfactoryandtrigeminalstimulants