Cargando…

The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) depends highly on the coil orientation relative to the subject’s head. This implies that the direction of the induced electric field has a large effect on the efficiency of TMS. To improve future protocols, knowledge about the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janssen, Arno M, Oostendorp, Thom F, Stegeman, Dick F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25981522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0036-2
_version_ 1782371949832306688
author Janssen, Arno M
Oostendorp, Thom F
Stegeman, Dick F
author_facet Janssen, Arno M
Oostendorp, Thom F
Stegeman, Dick F
author_sort Janssen, Arno M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) depends highly on the coil orientation relative to the subject’s head. This implies that the direction of the induced electric field has a large effect on the efficiency of TMS. To improve future protocols, knowledge about the relationship between the coil orientation and the direction of the induced electric field on the one hand, and the head and brain anatomy on the other hand, seems crucial. Therefore, the induced electric field in the cortex as a function of the coil orientation has been examined in this study. METHODS: The effect of changing the coil orientation on the induced electric field was evaluated for fourteen cortical targets. We used a finite element model to calculate the induced electric fields for thirty-six coil orientations (10 degrees resolution) per target location. The effects on the electric field due to coil rotation, in combination with target site anatomy, have been quantified. RESULTS: The results confirm that the electric field perpendicular to the anterior sulcal wall of the central sulcus is highly susceptible to coil orientation changes and has to be maximized for an optimal stimulation effect of the motor cortex. In order to obtain maximum stimulation effect in areas other than the motor cortex, the electric field perpendicular to the cortical surface in those areas has to be maximized as well. Small orientation changes (10 degrees) do not alter the induced electric field drastically. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that for all cortical targets, maximizing the strength of the electric field perpendicular to the targeted cortical surface area (and inward directed) optimizes the effect of TMS. Orienting the TMS coil based on anatomical information (anatomical magnetic resonance imaging data) about the targeted brain area can improve future results. The standard coil orientations, used in cognitive and clinical neuroscience, induce (near) optimal electric fields in the subject-specific head model in most cases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0036-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4435642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44356422015-05-19 The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas Janssen, Arno M Oostendorp, Thom F Stegeman, Dick F J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) depends highly on the coil orientation relative to the subject’s head. This implies that the direction of the induced electric field has a large effect on the efficiency of TMS. To improve future protocols, knowledge about the relationship between the coil orientation and the direction of the induced electric field on the one hand, and the head and brain anatomy on the other hand, seems crucial. Therefore, the induced electric field in the cortex as a function of the coil orientation has been examined in this study. METHODS: The effect of changing the coil orientation on the induced electric field was evaluated for fourteen cortical targets. We used a finite element model to calculate the induced electric fields for thirty-six coil orientations (10 degrees resolution) per target location. The effects on the electric field due to coil rotation, in combination with target site anatomy, have been quantified. RESULTS: The results confirm that the electric field perpendicular to the anterior sulcal wall of the central sulcus is highly susceptible to coil orientation changes and has to be maximized for an optimal stimulation effect of the motor cortex. In order to obtain maximum stimulation effect in areas other than the motor cortex, the electric field perpendicular to the cortical surface in those areas has to be maximized as well. Small orientation changes (10 degrees) do not alter the induced electric field drastically. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that for all cortical targets, maximizing the strength of the electric field perpendicular to the targeted cortical surface area (and inward directed) optimizes the effect of TMS. Orienting the TMS coil based on anatomical information (anatomical magnetic resonance imaging data) about the targeted brain area can improve future results. The standard coil orientations, used in cognitive and clinical neuroscience, induce (near) optimal electric fields in the subject-specific head model in most cases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0036-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4435642/ /pubmed/25981522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0036-2 Text en © Janssen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Janssen, Arno M
Oostendorp, Thom F
Stegeman, Dick F
The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas
title The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas
title_full The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas
title_fullStr The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas
title_full_unstemmed The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas
title_short The coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by TMS for M1 and other brain areas
title_sort coil orientation dependency of the electric field induced by tms for m1 and other brain areas
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25981522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0036-2
work_keys_str_mv AT janssenarnom thecoilorientationdependencyoftheelectricfieldinducedbytmsform1andotherbrainareas
AT oostendorpthomf thecoilorientationdependencyoftheelectricfieldinducedbytmsform1andotherbrainareas
AT stegemandickf thecoilorientationdependencyoftheelectricfieldinducedbytmsform1andotherbrainareas
AT janssenarnom coilorientationdependencyoftheelectricfieldinducedbytmsform1andotherbrainareas
AT oostendorpthomf coilorientationdependencyoftheelectricfieldinducedbytmsform1andotherbrainareas
AT stegemandickf coilorientationdependencyoftheelectricfieldinducedbytmsform1andotherbrainareas