Cargando…
Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform
The test–retest reliability of the modified sensory interaction test on a force platform was performed in a group of 26 young and 15 elderly females for four sensory conditions: standing on firm and compliant surface with eyes open and closed. The test–retest reliability was good to excellent in bot...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25749711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1259-x |
_version_ | 1782371973725159424 |
---|---|
author | Rugelj, Darja Hrastnik, Ajda Sevšek, France Vauhnik, Renata |
author_facet | Rugelj, Darja Hrastnik, Ajda Sevšek, France Vauhnik, Renata |
author_sort | Rugelj, Darja |
collection | PubMed |
description | The test–retest reliability of the modified sensory interaction test on a force platform was performed in a group of 26 young and 15 elderly females for four sensory conditions: standing on firm and compliant surface with eyes open and closed. The test–retest reliability was good to excellent in both groups, with higher level of test–retest reliability in more demanding conditions. The most reliable time-domain variables for standing on firm surface with eyes open were: sway area from principal components (ICC = 0.77) for young and mean velocity, medio-lateral and total path lengths (ICC = 0.91) for elderly. For eyes closed, the most reliable variables were antero-posterior path length and sway area calculated by Fourier coefficients (ICC = 0.85) for young and medio-lateral path length (ICC = 0.93) for elderly. For compliant surface with open eyes, the most reliable variable was medio-lateral variability (ICC = 0.83) for young and total path length and mean velocity (ICC = 0.92) for elderly participants, whereas for eyes closed the most reliable variables were mean velocity, total and medio-lateral path lengths for young, and mean velocity for elderly group, all with ICC = 0.90. Modified sensory interaction test is therefore a reliable measure for balance and could be recommended as an outcome measure for balance retraining programmes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4435857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44358572015-05-22 Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform Rugelj, Darja Hrastnik, Ajda Sevšek, France Vauhnik, Renata Med Biol Eng Comput Original Article The test–retest reliability of the modified sensory interaction test on a force platform was performed in a group of 26 young and 15 elderly females for four sensory conditions: standing on firm and compliant surface with eyes open and closed. The test–retest reliability was good to excellent in both groups, with higher level of test–retest reliability in more demanding conditions. The most reliable time-domain variables for standing on firm surface with eyes open were: sway area from principal components (ICC = 0.77) for young and mean velocity, medio-lateral and total path lengths (ICC = 0.91) for elderly. For eyes closed, the most reliable variables were antero-posterior path length and sway area calculated by Fourier coefficients (ICC = 0.85) for young and medio-lateral path length (ICC = 0.93) for elderly. For compliant surface with open eyes, the most reliable variable was medio-lateral variability (ICC = 0.83) for young and total path length and mean velocity (ICC = 0.92) for elderly participants, whereas for eyes closed the most reliable variables were mean velocity, total and medio-lateral path lengths for young, and mean velocity for elderly group, all with ICC = 0.90. Modified sensory interaction test is therefore a reliable measure for balance and could be recommended as an outcome measure for balance retraining programmes. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-03-07 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4435857/ /pubmed/25749711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1259-x Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rugelj, Darja Hrastnik, Ajda Sevšek, France Vauhnik, Renata Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform |
title | Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform |
title_full | Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform |
title_fullStr | Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform |
title_short | Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform |
title_sort | reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25749711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1259-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rugeljdarja reliabilityofmodifiedsensoryinteractiontestasmeasuredwithforceplatform AT hrastnikajda reliabilityofmodifiedsensoryinteractiontestasmeasuredwithforceplatform AT sevsekfrance reliabilityofmodifiedsensoryinteractiontestasmeasuredwithforceplatform AT vauhnikrenata reliabilityofmodifiedsensoryinteractiontestasmeasuredwithforceplatform |