Cargando…

Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform

The test–retest reliability of the modified sensory interaction test on a force platform was performed in a group of 26 young and 15 elderly females for four sensory conditions: standing on firm and compliant surface with eyes open and closed. The test–retest reliability was good to excellent in bot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rugelj, Darja, Hrastnik, Ajda, Sevšek, France, Vauhnik, Renata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25749711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1259-x
_version_ 1782371973725159424
author Rugelj, Darja
Hrastnik, Ajda
Sevšek, France
Vauhnik, Renata
author_facet Rugelj, Darja
Hrastnik, Ajda
Sevšek, France
Vauhnik, Renata
author_sort Rugelj, Darja
collection PubMed
description The test–retest reliability of the modified sensory interaction test on a force platform was performed in a group of 26 young and 15 elderly females for four sensory conditions: standing on firm and compliant surface with eyes open and closed. The test–retest reliability was good to excellent in both groups, with higher level of test–retest reliability in more demanding conditions. The most reliable time-domain variables for standing on firm surface with eyes open were: sway area from principal components (ICC = 0.77) for young and mean velocity, medio-lateral and total path lengths (ICC = 0.91) for elderly. For eyes closed, the most reliable variables were antero-posterior path length and sway area calculated by Fourier coefficients (ICC = 0.85) for young and medio-lateral path length (ICC = 0.93) for elderly. For compliant surface with open eyes, the most reliable variable was medio-lateral variability (ICC = 0.83) for young and total path length and mean velocity (ICC = 0.92) for elderly participants, whereas for eyes closed the most reliable variables were mean velocity, total and medio-lateral path lengths for young, and mean velocity for elderly group, all with ICC = 0.90. Modified sensory interaction test is therefore a reliable measure for balance and could be recommended as an outcome measure for balance retraining programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4435857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44358572015-05-22 Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform Rugelj, Darja Hrastnik, Ajda Sevšek, France Vauhnik, Renata Med Biol Eng Comput Original Article The test–retest reliability of the modified sensory interaction test on a force platform was performed in a group of 26 young and 15 elderly females for four sensory conditions: standing on firm and compliant surface with eyes open and closed. The test–retest reliability was good to excellent in both groups, with higher level of test–retest reliability in more demanding conditions. The most reliable time-domain variables for standing on firm surface with eyes open were: sway area from principal components (ICC = 0.77) for young and mean velocity, medio-lateral and total path lengths (ICC = 0.91) for elderly. For eyes closed, the most reliable variables were antero-posterior path length and sway area calculated by Fourier coefficients (ICC = 0.85) for young and medio-lateral path length (ICC = 0.93) for elderly. For compliant surface with open eyes, the most reliable variable was medio-lateral variability (ICC = 0.83) for young and total path length and mean velocity (ICC = 0.92) for elderly participants, whereas for eyes closed the most reliable variables were mean velocity, total and medio-lateral path lengths for young, and mean velocity for elderly group, all with ICC = 0.90. Modified sensory interaction test is therefore a reliable measure for balance and could be recommended as an outcome measure for balance retraining programmes. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-03-07 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4435857/ /pubmed/25749711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1259-x Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rugelj, Darja
Hrastnik, Ajda
Sevšek, France
Vauhnik, Renata
Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform
title Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform
title_full Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform
title_fullStr Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform
title_short Reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform
title_sort reliability of modified sensory interaction test as measured with force platform
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4435857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25749711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1259-x
work_keys_str_mv AT rugeljdarja reliabilityofmodifiedsensoryinteractiontestasmeasuredwithforceplatform
AT hrastnikajda reliabilityofmodifiedsensoryinteractiontestasmeasuredwithforceplatform
AT sevsekfrance reliabilityofmodifiedsensoryinteractiontestasmeasuredwithforceplatform
AT vauhnikrenata reliabilityofmodifiedsensoryinteractiontestasmeasuredwithforceplatform