Cargando…
Comparing methods of determining Legionella spp. in complex water matrices
BACKGROUND: Legionella testing conducted at environmental laboratories plays an essential role in assessing the risk of disease transmission associated with water systems. However, drawbacks of culture-based methodology used for Legionella enumeration can have great impact on the results and interpr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4436101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25925400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0423-7 |
_version_ | 1782372005261082624 |
---|---|
author | Díaz-Flores, Álvaro Montero, Juan Carlos Castro, Francisco Javier Alejandres, Eva María Bayón, Carmen Solís, Inmaculada Fernández-Lafuente, Roberto Rodríguez, Guillermo |
author_facet | Díaz-Flores, Álvaro Montero, Juan Carlos Castro, Francisco Javier Alejandres, Eva María Bayón, Carmen Solís, Inmaculada Fernández-Lafuente, Roberto Rodríguez, Guillermo |
author_sort | Díaz-Flores, Álvaro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Legionella testing conducted at environmental laboratories plays an essential role in assessing the risk of disease transmission associated with water systems. However, drawbacks of culture-based methodology used for Legionella enumeration can have great impact on the results and interpretation which together can lead to underestimation of the actual risk. Up to 20% of the samples analysed by these laboratories produced inconclusive results, making effective risk management impossible. Overgrowth of competing microbiota was reported as an important factor for culture failure. For quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), the interpretation of the results from the environmental samples still remains a challenge. Inhibitors may cause up to 10% of inconclusive results. This study compared a quantitative method based on immunomagnetic separation (IMS method) with culture and qPCR, as a new approach to routine monitoring of Legionella. RESULTS: First, pilot studies evaluated the recovery and detectability of Legionella spp using an IMS method, in the presence of microbiota and biocides. The IMS method results were not affected by microbiota while culture counts were significantly reduced (1.4 log) or negative in the same samples. Damage by biocides of viable Legionella was detected by the IMS method. Secondly, a total of 65 water samples were assayed by all three techniques (culture, qPCR and the IMS method). Of these, 27 (41.5%) were recorded as positive by at least one test. Legionella spp was detected by culture in 7 (25.9%) of the 27 samples. Eighteen (66.7%) of the 27 samples were positive by the IMS method, thirteen of them reporting counts below 10(3) colony forming units per liter (CFU l(−1)), six presented interfering microbiota and three presented PCR inhibition. Of the 65 water samples, 24 presented interfering microbiota by culture and 8 presented partial or complete inhibition of the PCR reaction. So the rate of inconclusive results of culture and PCR was 36.9 and 12.3%, respectively, without any inconclusive results reported for the IMS method. CONCLUSION: The IMS method generally improved the recovery and detectability of Legionella in environmental matrices, suggesting the possibility to use IMS method as valuable indicator of risk. Thus, this method may significantly improve our knowledge about the exposure risk to these bacteria, allowing us to implement evidence-based monitoring and disinfection strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4436101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44361012015-05-20 Comparing methods of determining Legionella spp. in complex water matrices Díaz-Flores, Álvaro Montero, Juan Carlos Castro, Francisco Javier Alejandres, Eva María Bayón, Carmen Solís, Inmaculada Fernández-Lafuente, Roberto Rodríguez, Guillermo BMC Microbiol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Legionella testing conducted at environmental laboratories plays an essential role in assessing the risk of disease transmission associated with water systems. However, drawbacks of culture-based methodology used for Legionella enumeration can have great impact on the results and interpretation which together can lead to underestimation of the actual risk. Up to 20% of the samples analysed by these laboratories produced inconclusive results, making effective risk management impossible. Overgrowth of competing microbiota was reported as an important factor for culture failure. For quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), the interpretation of the results from the environmental samples still remains a challenge. Inhibitors may cause up to 10% of inconclusive results. This study compared a quantitative method based on immunomagnetic separation (IMS method) with culture and qPCR, as a new approach to routine monitoring of Legionella. RESULTS: First, pilot studies evaluated the recovery and detectability of Legionella spp using an IMS method, in the presence of microbiota and biocides. The IMS method results were not affected by microbiota while culture counts were significantly reduced (1.4 log) or negative in the same samples. Damage by biocides of viable Legionella was detected by the IMS method. Secondly, a total of 65 water samples were assayed by all three techniques (culture, qPCR and the IMS method). Of these, 27 (41.5%) were recorded as positive by at least one test. Legionella spp was detected by culture in 7 (25.9%) of the 27 samples. Eighteen (66.7%) of the 27 samples were positive by the IMS method, thirteen of them reporting counts below 10(3) colony forming units per liter (CFU l(−1)), six presented interfering microbiota and three presented PCR inhibition. Of the 65 water samples, 24 presented interfering microbiota by culture and 8 presented partial or complete inhibition of the PCR reaction. So the rate of inconclusive results of culture and PCR was 36.9 and 12.3%, respectively, without any inconclusive results reported for the IMS method. CONCLUSION: The IMS method generally improved the recovery and detectability of Legionella in environmental matrices, suggesting the possibility to use IMS method as valuable indicator of risk. Thus, this method may significantly improve our knowledge about the exposure risk to these bacteria, allowing us to implement evidence-based monitoring and disinfection strategies. BioMed Central 2015-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4436101/ /pubmed/25925400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0423-7 Text en © Díaz-Flores et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Díaz-Flores, Álvaro Montero, Juan Carlos Castro, Francisco Javier Alejandres, Eva María Bayón, Carmen Solís, Inmaculada Fernández-Lafuente, Roberto Rodríguez, Guillermo Comparing methods of determining Legionella spp. in complex water matrices |
title | Comparing methods of determining Legionella spp. in complex water matrices |
title_full | Comparing methods of determining Legionella spp. in complex water matrices |
title_fullStr | Comparing methods of determining Legionella spp. in complex water matrices |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing methods of determining Legionella spp. in complex water matrices |
title_short | Comparing methods of determining Legionella spp. in complex water matrices |
title_sort | comparing methods of determining legionella spp. in complex water matrices |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4436101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25925400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0423-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diazfloresalvaro comparingmethodsofdetermininglegionellasppincomplexwatermatrices AT monterojuancarlos comparingmethodsofdetermininglegionellasppincomplexwatermatrices AT castrofranciscojavier comparingmethodsofdetermininglegionellasppincomplexwatermatrices AT alejandresevamaria comparingmethodsofdetermininglegionellasppincomplexwatermatrices AT bayoncarmen comparingmethodsofdetermininglegionellasppincomplexwatermatrices AT solisinmaculada comparingmethodsofdetermininglegionellasppincomplexwatermatrices AT fernandezlafuenteroberto comparingmethodsofdetermininglegionellasppincomplexwatermatrices AT rodriguezguillermo comparingmethodsofdetermininglegionellasppincomplexwatermatrices |