Cargando…

Clinical outcomes with bevacizumab-containing and non-bevacizumab–containing regimens in patients with recurrent glioblastoma from US community practices

This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab as monotherapy and with irinotecan for recurrent glioblastoma in community-based practices. Adult patients with bevacizumab-naive, recurrent glioblastoma initiating second-line treatment (July 2006–June 2010) were identified using McKess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Clara, Ravelo, Arliene, Yu, Elaine, Dhanda, Rahul, Schnadig, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4436682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25773061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1752-y
_version_ 1782372116827471872
author Chen, Clara
Ravelo, Arliene
Yu, Elaine
Dhanda, Rahul
Schnadig, Ian
author_facet Chen, Clara
Ravelo, Arliene
Yu, Elaine
Dhanda, Rahul
Schnadig, Ian
author_sort Chen, Clara
collection PubMed
description This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab as monotherapy and with irinotecan for recurrent glioblastoma in community-based practices. Adult patients with bevacizumab-naive, recurrent glioblastoma initiating second-line treatment (July 2006–June 2010) were identified using McKesson Specialty Health/US Oncology Network health records. Overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) estimates were analyzed through July 2011 and compared for bevacizumab and non-bevacizumab regimens using the log-rank test. An adjusted Cox proportional hazards model assessed the effects of patient and treatment characteristics on outcomes. The analysis identified 159 patients initiating second-line treatment with a bevacizumab-monotherapy (n = 57), bevacizumab-combination (n = 79), or non-bevacizumab (n = 23) regimen. Patient characteristics were generally similar across groups. In the Cox analyses, OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.31–0.82]; univariate medians: 8.86 vs. 5.19 months) was significantly longer with bevacizumab-containing regimens. Median PFS was longer with bevacizumab-containing regimens, but did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.64 [95 % CI 0.38–1.09]; univariate medians: 7.00 vs. 4.00 months). Analyses showed that each bevacizumab treatment group relative to non-bevacizumab had a reduced risk of death (bevacizumab-monotherapy regimen: HR 0.56 [95 % CI 0.31–1.03] and bevacizumab-combination regimen: HR 0.34 [95 % CI 0.21–0.68]). Patients receiving the bevacizumab-combination regimen trended toward longer OS and PFS than those receiving the bevacizumab-monotherapy regimen. Rates of bevacizumab-related toxicities were consistent with clinical trial reports. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11060-015-1752-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4436682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44366822015-05-22 Clinical outcomes with bevacizumab-containing and non-bevacizumab–containing regimens in patients with recurrent glioblastoma from US community practices Chen, Clara Ravelo, Arliene Yu, Elaine Dhanda, Rahul Schnadig, Ian J Neurooncol Clinical Study This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab as monotherapy and with irinotecan for recurrent glioblastoma in community-based practices. Adult patients with bevacizumab-naive, recurrent glioblastoma initiating second-line treatment (July 2006–June 2010) were identified using McKesson Specialty Health/US Oncology Network health records. Overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) estimates were analyzed through July 2011 and compared for bevacizumab and non-bevacizumab regimens using the log-rank test. An adjusted Cox proportional hazards model assessed the effects of patient and treatment characteristics on outcomes. The analysis identified 159 patients initiating second-line treatment with a bevacizumab-monotherapy (n = 57), bevacizumab-combination (n = 79), or non-bevacizumab (n = 23) regimen. Patient characteristics were generally similar across groups. In the Cox analyses, OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.31–0.82]; univariate medians: 8.86 vs. 5.19 months) was significantly longer with bevacizumab-containing regimens. Median PFS was longer with bevacizumab-containing regimens, but did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.64 [95 % CI 0.38–1.09]; univariate medians: 7.00 vs. 4.00 months). Analyses showed that each bevacizumab treatment group relative to non-bevacizumab had a reduced risk of death (bevacizumab-monotherapy regimen: HR 0.56 [95 % CI 0.31–1.03] and bevacizumab-combination regimen: HR 0.34 [95 % CI 0.21–0.68]). Patients receiving the bevacizumab-combination regimen trended toward longer OS and PFS than those receiving the bevacizumab-monotherapy regimen. Rates of bevacizumab-related toxicities were consistent with clinical trial reports. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11060-015-1752-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2015-03-15 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4436682/ /pubmed/25773061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1752-y Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Chen, Clara
Ravelo, Arliene
Yu, Elaine
Dhanda, Rahul
Schnadig, Ian
Clinical outcomes with bevacizumab-containing and non-bevacizumab–containing regimens in patients with recurrent glioblastoma from US community practices
title Clinical outcomes with bevacizumab-containing and non-bevacizumab–containing regimens in patients with recurrent glioblastoma from US community practices
title_full Clinical outcomes with bevacizumab-containing and non-bevacizumab–containing regimens in patients with recurrent glioblastoma from US community practices
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes with bevacizumab-containing and non-bevacizumab–containing regimens in patients with recurrent glioblastoma from US community practices
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes with bevacizumab-containing and non-bevacizumab–containing regimens in patients with recurrent glioblastoma from US community practices
title_short Clinical outcomes with bevacizumab-containing and non-bevacizumab–containing regimens in patients with recurrent glioblastoma from US community practices
title_sort clinical outcomes with bevacizumab-containing and non-bevacizumab–containing regimens in patients with recurrent glioblastoma from us community practices
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4436682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25773061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1752-y
work_keys_str_mv AT chenclara clinicaloutcomeswithbevacizumabcontainingandnonbevacizumabcontainingregimensinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomafromuscommunitypractices
AT raveloarliene clinicaloutcomeswithbevacizumabcontainingandnonbevacizumabcontainingregimensinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomafromuscommunitypractices
AT yuelaine clinicaloutcomeswithbevacizumabcontainingandnonbevacizumabcontainingregimensinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomafromuscommunitypractices
AT dhandarahul clinicaloutcomeswithbevacizumabcontainingandnonbevacizumabcontainingregimensinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomafromuscommunitypractices
AT schnadigian clinicaloutcomeswithbevacizumabcontainingandnonbevacizumabcontainingregimensinpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomafromuscommunitypractices