Cargando…

Polymerase chain reaction-based active surveillance of MRSA in emergency department patients

Conventional culture methods to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) take a few days, and their sensitivity and usefulness also need to be improved. In this study, active screening was performed using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for colonization with MRSA on admission an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seki, Masafumi, Takahashi, Hiroki, Yamamoto, Norihisa, Hamaguchi, Shigeto, Ojima, Masahiro, Hirose, Tomoya, Yoshiya, Kazuhisa, Ogura, Hiroshi, Shimazu, Takeshi, Tomono, Kazunori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4437520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25999747
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S80123
_version_ 1782372228899274752
author Seki, Masafumi
Takahashi, Hiroki
Yamamoto, Norihisa
Hamaguchi, Shigeto
Ojima, Masahiro
Hirose, Tomoya
Yoshiya, Kazuhisa
Ogura, Hiroshi
Shimazu, Takeshi
Tomono, Kazunori
author_facet Seki, Masafumi
Takahashi, Hiroki
Yamamoto, Norihisa
Hamaguchi, Shigeto
Ojima, Masahiro
Hirose, Tomoya
Yoshiya, Kazuhisa
Ogura, Hiroshi
Shimazu, Takeshi
Tomono, Kazunori
author_sort Seki, Masafumi
collection PubMed
description Conventional culture methods to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) take a few days, and their sensitivity and usefulness also need to be improved. In this study, active screening was performed using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for colonization with MRSA on admission and follow-up surveillance after admission to an emergency department between June 2012 and August 2012, and the backgrounds of PCR and/or culture-method-positive patients were compared. Among 95 patients, 15 (15.8%) patients were positive for MRSA on PCR and/or culture; 6.3% (6/95) of patients were positive on admission, and 9.5% (9/95) became positive during the stay after admission. The major primary diagnoses in MRSA-positive patients were trauma and cerebrovascular diseases. Nine (60%) of 15 patients were MRSA-positive on both PCR and culture, compared with three (20%) of 15 who were PCR-positive but culture-negative. The other three (20%) of 15 patients were PCR-negative but culture-positive. Furthermore, there was a tendency for younger age and shorter stay to be associated with PCR-positive but culture-negative results. These findings suggest that active surveillance with PCR may be highly sensitive and useful for the early diagnosis of MRSA colonization to prevent nosocomial transmission from the emergency department to the regular inpatient wards of the hospital.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4437520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44375202015-05-21 Polymerase chain reaction-based active surveillance of MRSA in emergency department patients Seki, Masafumi Takahashi, Hiroki Yamamoto, Norihisa Hamaguchi, Shigeto Ojima, Masahiro Hirose, Tomoya Yoshiya, Kazuhisa Ogura, Hiroshi Shimazu, Takeshi Tomono, Kazunori Infect Drug Resist Original Research Conventional culture methods to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) take a few days, and their sensitivity and usefulness also need to be improved. In this study, active screening was performed using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for colonization with MRSA on admission and follow-up surveillance after admission to an emergency department between June 2012 and August 2012, and the backgrounds of PCR and/or culture-method-positive patients were compared. Among 95 patients, 15 (15.8%) patients were positive for MRSA on PCR and/or culture; 6.3% (6/95) of patients were positive on admission, and 9.5% (9/95) became positive during the stay after admission. The major primary diagnoses in MRSA-positive patients were trauma and cerebrovascular diseases. Nine (60%) of 15 patients were MRSA-positive on both PCR and culture, compared with three (20%) of 15 who were PCR-positive but culture-negative. The other three (20%) of 15 patients were PCR-negative but culture-positive. Furthermore, there was a tendency for younger age and shorter stay to be associated with PCR-positive but culture-negative results. These findings suggest that active surveillance with PCR may be highly sensitive and useful for the early diagnosis of MRSA colonization to prevent nosocomial transmission from the emergency department to the regular inpatient wards of the hospital. Dove Medical Press 2015-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4437520/ /pubmed/25999747 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S80123 Text en © 2015 Seki et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Seki, Masafumi
Takahashi, Hiroki
Yamamoto, Norihisa
Hamaguchi, Shigeto
Ojima, Masahiro
Hirose, Tomoya
Yoshiya, Kazuhisa
Ogura, Hiroshi
Shimazu, Takeshi
Tomono, Kazunori
Polymerase chain reaction-based active surveillance of MRSA in emergency department patients
title Polymerase chain reaction-based active surveillance of MRSA in emergency department patients
title_full Polymerase chain reaction-based active surveillance of MRSA in emergency department patients
title_fullStr Polymerase chain reaction-based active surveillance of MRSA in emergency department patients
title_full_unstemmed Polymerase chain reaction-based active surveillance of MRSA in emergency department patients
title_short Polymerase chain reaction-based active surveillance of MRSA in emergency department patients
title_sort polymerase chain reaction-based active surveillance of mrsa in emergency department patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4437520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25999747
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S80123
work_keys_str_mv AT sekimasafumi polymerasechainreactionbasedactivesurveillanceofmrsainemergencydepartmentpatients
AT takahashihiroki polymerasechainreactionbasedactivesurveillanceofmrsainemergencydepartmentpatients
AT yamamotonorihisa polymerasechainreactionbasedactivesurveillanceofmrsainemergencydepartmentpatients
AT hamaguchishigeto polymerasechainreactionbasedactivesurveillanceofmrsainemergencydepartmentpatients
AT ojimamasahiro polymerasechainreactionbasedactivesurveillanceofmrsainemergencydepartmentpatients
AT hirosetomoya polymerasechainreactionbasedactivesurveillanceofmrsainemergencydepartmentpatients
AT yoshiyakazuhisa polymerasechainreactionbasedactivesurveillanceofmrsainemergencydepartmentpatients
AT ogurahiroshi polymerasechainreactionbasedactivesurveillanceofmrsainemergencydepartmentpatients
AT shimazutakeshi polymerasechainreactionbasedactivesurveillanceofmrsainemergencydepartmentpatients
AT tomonokazunori polymerasechainreactionbasedactivesurveillanceofmrsainemergencydepartmentpatients