Cargando…

The long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction in a diverse U.S. cohort of children: the EPOCH study

OBJECTIVE: To explore the long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) among a diverse, contemporary cohort of U.S. children. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 42 children exposed to IUGR and 464 unexposed who were members of Kaiser Permanente of Colorado. Height and weight...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crume, Tessa L, Scherzinger, Ann, Stamm, Elizabeth, McDuffie, Robert, Bischoff, Kimberly J., Hamman, Richard F., Dabelea, Dana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4437590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23836432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20565
_version_ 1782372233490989056
author Crume, Tessa L
Scherzinger, Ann
Stamm, Elizabeth
McDuffie, Robert
Bischoff, Kimberly J.
Hamman, Richard F.
Dabelea, Dana
author_facet Crume, Tessa L
Scherzinger, Ann
Stamm, Elizabeth
McDuffie, Robert
Bischoff, Kimberly J.
Hamman, Richard F.
Dabelea, Dana
author_sort Crume, Tessa L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) among a diverse, contemporary cohort of U.S. children. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 42 children exposed to IUGR and 464 unexposed who were members of Kaiser Permanente of Colorado. Height and weight measurements since birth and measures of abdominal adiposity and insulin-resistance were measured at an average age of 10.6 (±1.3) years. RESULTS: Infants born IUGR experienced ‘catch-up growth’ in the first 12 months of life at a rate of 3.58 kg/m(2) compared to 2.36 kg/m(2) in unexposed infants (p=0.01). However, after 1 year of age, no differences in BMI growth velocity were observed. Nevertheless children exposed to IUGR had higher waist circumference (67.0 vs. 65.3 cm, p=0.03), higher insulin (15.2 vs. 11.0 uU/ml, p=0.0002), higher HOMA-IR (2.8 vs. 2.3, p=0.03) and lower adiponectin levels (9.0 vs. 12.0 ug/ml, p=0.003) in adolescence, independent of other childhood and maternal factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our data from a contemporary U.S. cohort suggests that children exposed to IUGR have increased abdominal fat and increased insulin resistance biomarkers despite no differences in BMI growth patterns beyond 12 months of age. These data provide further support for the fetal programming hypothesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4437590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44375902015-05-19 The long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction in a diverse U.S. cohort of children: the EPOCH study Crume, Tessa L Scherzinger, Ann Stamm, Elizabeth McDuffie, Robert Bischoff, Kimberly J. Hamman, Richard F. Dabelea, Dana Obesity (Silver Spring) Article OBJECTIVE: To explore the long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) among a diverse, contemporary cohort of U.S. children. DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 42 children exposed to IUGR and 464 unexposed who were members of Kaiser Permanente of Colorado. Height and weight measurements since birth and measures of abdominal adiposity and insulin-resistance were measured at an average age of 10.6 (±1.3) years. RESULTS: Infants born IUGR experienced ‘catch-up growth’ in the first 12 months of life at a rate of 3.58 kg/m(2) compared to 2.36 kg/m(2) in unexposed infants (p=0.01). However, after 1 year of age, no differences in BMI growth velocity were observed. Nevertheless children exposed to IUGR had higher waist circumference (67.0 vs. 65.3 cm, p=0.03), higher insulin (15.2 vs. 11.0 uU/ml, p=0.0002), higher HOMA-IR (2.8 vs. 2.3, p=0.03) and lower adiponectin levels (9.0 vs. 12.0 ug/ml, p=0.003) in adolescence, independent of other childhood and maternal factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our data from a contemporary U.S. cohort suggests that children exposed to IUGR have increased abdominal fat and increased insulin resistance biomarkers despite no differences in BMI growth patterns beyond 12 months of age. These data provide further support for the fetal programming hypothesis. 2013-09-17 2014-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4437590/ /pubmed/23836432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20565 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Crume, Tessa L
Scherzinger, Ann
Stamm, Elizabeth
McDuffie, Robert
Bischoff, Kimberly J.
Hamman, Richard F.
Dabelea, Dana
The long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction in a diverse U.S. cohort of children: the EPOCH study
title The long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction in a diverse U.S. cohort of children: the EPOCH study
title_full The long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction in a diverse U.S. cohort of children: the EPOCH study
title_fullStr The long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction in a diverse U.S. cohort of children: the EPOCH study
title_full_unstemmed The long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction in a diverse U.S. cohort of children: the EPOCH study
title_short The long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction in a diverse U.S. cohort of children: the EPOCH study
title_sort long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction in a diverse u.s. cohort of children: the epoch study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4437590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23836432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20565
work_keys_str_mv AT crumetessal thelongtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy
AT scherzingerann thelongtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy
AT stammelizabeth thelongtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy
AT mcduffierobert thelongtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy
AT bischoffkimberlyj thelongtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy
AT hammanrichardf thelongtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy
AT dabeleadana thelongtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy
AT crumetessal longtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy
AT scherzingerann longtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy
AT stammelizabeth longtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy
AT mcduffierobert longtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy
AT bischoffkimberlyj longtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy
AT hammanrichardf longtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy
AT dabeleadana longtermimpactofintrauterinegrowthrestrictioninadiverseuscohortofchildrentheepochstudy