Cargando…
Opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in women world-wide. In low and middle income countries, where there are no population-based mammographic screening programmes, late presentation is common, and because of inadequate access to optimal treatment, survival rates are poor....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4437679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25972043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1419-2 |
_version_ | 1782372244725432320 |
---|---|
author | Teh, Yew-Ching Tan, Gie-Hooi Taib, Nur Aishah Rahmat, Kartini Westerhout, Caroline Judy Fadzli, Farhana See, Mee-Hoong Jamaris, Suniza Yip, Cheng-Har |
author_facet | Teh, Yew-Ching Tan, Gie-Hooi Taib, Nur Aishah Rahmat, Kartini Westerhout, Caroline Judy Fadzli, Farhana See, Mee-Hoong Jamaris, Suniza Yip, Cheng-Har |
author_sort | Teh, Yew-Ching |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in women world-wide. In low and middle income countries, where there are no population-based mammographic screening programmes, late presentation is common, and because of inadequate access to optimal treatment, survival rates are poor. Mammographic screening is well-studied in high-income countries in western populations, and because it has been shown to reduce breast cancer mortality, it has become part of the healthcare systems in such countries. However the performance of mammographic screening in a developing country is largely unknown. This study aims to evaluate the performance of mammographic screening in Malaysia, a middle income country, and to compare the stage and surgical treatment of screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review of 2510 mammograms performed from Jan to Dec 2010 in a tertiary medical centre is carried out. The three groups identified are the routine (opportunistic) screening group, the targeted (high risk) screening group and the diagnostic group. The performance indicators of each group is calculated, and stage at presentation and treatment between the screening and diagnostic group is analyzed. RESULTS: The cancer detection rate in the opportunistic screening group, targeted screening group, and the symptomatic group is 0.5 %, 1.25 % and 26 % respectively. The proportion of ductal carcinoma in situ is 23.1 % in the two screening groups compared to only 2.5 % in the diagnostic group. Among the opportunistic screening group, the cancer detection rate was 0.2 % in women below 50 years old compared to 0.65 % in women 50 years and above. The performance indicators are within international standards. Early-staged breast cancer (Stage 0–2) were 84.6 % in the screening groups compared to 61.1 % in the diagnostic group. CONCLUSION: From the results, in a setting with resource constraints, targeted screening of high risk individuals will give a higher yield, and if more resources are available, population-based screening of women 50 and above is effective. Opportunistic mammographic screening is feasible and effective in a middle income country with performance indicators within international standards. Waiting until women are symptomatic will lead to more advanced cancers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4437679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44376792015-05-20 Opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system Teh, Yew-Ching Tan, Gie-Hooi Taib, Nur Aishah Rahmat, Kartini Westerhout, Caroline Judy Fadzli, Farhana See, Mee-Hoong Jamaris, Suniza Yip, Cheng-Har BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in women world-wide. In low and middle income countries, where there are no population-based mammographic screening programmes, late presentation is common, and because of inadequate access to optimal treatment, survival rates are poor. Mammographic screening is well-studied in high-income countries in western populations, and because it has been shown to reduce breast cancer mortality, it has become part of the healthcare systems in such countries. However the performance of mammographic screening in a developing country is largely unknown. This study aims to evaluate the performance of mammographic screening in Malaysia, a middle income country, and to compare the stage and surgical treatment of screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review of 2510 mammograms performed from Jan to Dec 2010 in a tertiary medical centre is carried out. The three groups identified are the routine (opportunistic) screening group, the targeted (high risk) screening group and the diagnostic group. The performance indicators of each group is calculated, and stage at presentation and treatment between the screening and diagnostic group is analyzed. RESULTS: The cancer detection rate in the opportunistic screening group, targeted screening group, and the symptomatic group is 0.5 %, 1.25 % and 26 % respectively. The proportion of ductal carcinoma in situ is 23.1 % in the two screening groups compared to only 2.5 % in the diagnostic group. Among the opportunistic screening group, the cancer detection rate was 0.2 % in women below 50 years old compared to 0.65 % in women 50 years and above. The performance indicators are within international standards. Early-staged breast cancer (Stage 0–2) were 84.6 % in the screening groups compared to 61.1 % in the diagnostic group. CONCLUSION: From the results, in a setting with resource constraints, targeted screening of high risk individuals will give a higher yield, and if more resources are available, population-based screening of women 50 and above is effective. Opportunistic mammographic screening is feasible and effective in a middle income country with performance indicators within international standards. Waiting until women are symptomatic will lead to more advanced cancers. BioMed Central 2015-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4437679/ /pubmed/25972043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1419-2 Text en © Teh et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Teh, Yew-Ching Tan, Gie-Hooi Taib, Nur Aishah Rahmat, Kartini Westerhout, Caroline Judy Fadzli, Farhana See, Mee-Hoong Jamaris, Suniza Yip, Cheng-Har Opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system |
title | Opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system |
title_full | Opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system |
title_fullStr | Opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system |
title_full_unstemmed | Opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system |
title_short | Opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system |
title_sort | opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4437679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25972043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1419-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tehyewching opportunisticmammographyscreeningprovideseffectivedetectionratesinalimitedresourcehealthcaresystem AT tangiehooi opportunisticmammographyscreeningprovideseffectivedetectionratesinalimitedresourcehealthcaresystem AT taibnuraishah opportunisticmammographyscreeningprovideseffectivedetectionratesinalimitedresourcehealthcaresystem AT rahmatkartini opportunisticmammographyscreeningprovideseffectivedetectionratesinalimitedresourcehealthcaresystem AT westerhoutcarolinejudy opportunisticmammographyscreeningprovideseffectivedetectionratesinalimitedresourcehealthcaresystem AT fadzlifarhana opportunisticmammographyscreeningprovideseffectivedetectionratesinalimitedresourcehealthcaresystem AT seemeehoong opportunisticmammographyscreeningprovideseffectivedetectionratesinalimitedresourcehealthcaresystem AT jamarissuniza opportunisticmammographyscreeningprovideseffectivedetectionratesinalimitedresourcehealthcaresystem AT yipchenghar opportunisticmammographyscreeningprovideseffectivedetectionratesinalimitedresourcehealthcaresystem |