Cargando…
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort
Objectives. The anti-dsDNA antibodies are a marker for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and 70–98% of patients test positive. We evaluated the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutical features of a monocentric SLE cohort according to the anti-dsDNA status. Methods. We identified three...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4438145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26063969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/328078 |
_version_ | 1782372282866335744 |
---|---|
author | Fabrizio, Conti Fulvia, Ceccarelli Carlo, Perricone Laura, Massaro Elisa, Marocchi Francesca, Miranda Francesca Romana, Spinelli Simona, Truglia Cristiano, Alessandri Guido, Valesini |
author_facet | Fabrizio, Conti Fulvia, Ceccarelli Carlo, Perricone Laura, Massaro Elisa, Marocchi Francesca, Miranda Francesca Romana, Spinelli Simona, Truglia Cristiano, Alessandri Guido, Valesini |
author_sort | Fabrizio, Conti |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives. The anti-dsDNA antibodies are a marker for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and 70–98% of patients test positive. We evaluated the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutical features of a monocentric SLE cohort according to the anti-dsDNA status. Methods. We identified three groups: anti-dsDNA + (persistent positivity); anti-dsDNA ± (initial positivity and subsequent negativity during disease course); anti-dsDNA − (persistent negativity). Disease activity was assessed by the European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM). Results. We evaluated 393 patients (anti-dsDNA +: 62.3%; anti-dsDNA ±: 13.3%; anti-dsDNA −: 24.4%). The renal involvement was significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA + (30.2%), compared with anti-dsDNA ± and anti-dsDNA − (21.1% and 18.7%, resp.; P = 0.001). Serositis resulted significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA − (82.3%) compared to anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (20.8% and 13.4%, resp.; P < 0.0001). The reduction of C4 serum levels was identified significantly more frequently in anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (40.0% and 44.2%, resp.) compared with anti-dsDNA − (21.8%, P = 0.005). We did not identify significant differences in the mean ECLAM values before and after modification of anti-dsDNA status (P = 0.7). Conclusion. Anti-dsDNA status influences the clinical and immunological features of SLE patients. Nonetheless, it does not appear to affect disease activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4438145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44381452015-06-10 Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort Fabrizio, Conti Fulvia, Ceccarelli Carlo, Perricone Laura, Massaro Elisa, Marocchi Francesca, Miranda Francesca Romana, Spinelli Simona, Truglia Cristiano, Alessandri Guido, Valesini Mediators Inflamm Research Article Objectives. The anti-dsDNA antibodies are a marker for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and 70–98% of patients test positive. We evaluated the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutical features of a monocentric SLE cohort according to the anti-dsDNA status. Methods. We identified three groups: anti-dsDNA + (persistent positivity); anti-dsDNA ± (initial positivity and subsequent negativity during disease course); anti-dsDNA − (persistent negativity). Disease activity was assessed by the European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM). Results. We evaluated 393 patients (anti-dsDNA +: 62.3%; anti-dsDNA ±: 13.3%; anti-dsDNA −: 24.4%). The renal involvement was significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA + (30.2%), compared with anti-dsDNA ± and anti-dsDNA − (21.1% and 18.7%, resp.; P = 0.001). Serositis resulted significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA − (82.3%) compared to anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (20.8% and 13.4%, resp.; P < 0.0001). The reduction of C4 serum levels was identified significantly more frequently in anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (40.0% and 44.2%, resp.) compared with anti-dsDNA − (21.8%, P = 0.005). We did not identify significant differences in the mean ECLAM values before and after modification of anti-dsDNA status (P = 0.7). Conclusion. Anti-dsDNA status influences the clinical and immunological features of SLE patients. Nonetheless, it does not appear to affect disease activity. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4438145/ /pubmed/26063969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/328078 Text en Copyright © 2015 Conti Fabrizio et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fabrizio, Conti Fulvia, Ceccarelli Carlo, Perricone Laura, Massaro Elisa, Marocchi Francesca, Miranda Francesca Romana, Spinelli Simona, Truglia Cristiano, Alessandri Guido, Valesini Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort |
title | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort |
title_full | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort |
title_fullStr | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort |
title_short | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort |
title_sort | systemic lupus erythematosus with and without anti-dsdna antibodies: analysis from a large monocentric cohort |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4438145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26063969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/328078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fabrizioconti systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT fulviaceccarelli systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT carloperricone systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT lauramassaro systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT elisamarocchi systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT francescamiranda systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT francescaromanaspinelli systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT simonatruglia systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT cristianoalessandri systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT guidovalesini systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort |