Cargando…
Is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life?
Archaea and Bacteria constitute a majority of life systems on Earth but have long been considered inferior to Eukarya in terms of solute tolerance. Whereas the most halophilic prokaryotes are known for an ability to multiply at saturated NaCl (water activity (a(w)) 0.755) some xerophilic fungi can g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4438321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25500507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.219 |
_version_ | 1782372310529867776 |
---|---|
author | Stevenson, Andrew Cray, Jonathan A Williams, Jim P Santos, Ricardo Sahay, Richa Neuenkirchen, Nils McClure, Colin D Grant, Irene R Houghton, Jonathan DR Quinn, John P Timson, David J Patil, Satish V Singhal, Rekha S Antón, Josefa Dijksterhuis, Jan Hocking, Ailsa D Lievens, Bart Rangel, Drauzio E N Voytek, Mary A Gunde-Cimerman, Nina Oren, Aharon Timmis, Kenneth N McGenity, Terry J Hallsworth, John E |
author_facet | Stevenson, Andrew Cray, Jonathan A Williams, Jim P Santos, Ricardo Sahay, Richa Neuenkirchen, Nils McClure, Colin D Grant, Irene R Houghton, Jonathan DR Quinn, John P Timson, David J Patil, Satish V Singhal, Rekha S Antón, Josefa Dijksterhuis, Jan Hocking, Ailsa D Lievens, Bart Rangel, Drauzio E N Voytek, Mary A Gunde-Cimerman, Nina Oren, Aharon Timmis, Kenneth N McGenity, Terry J Hallsworth, John E |
author_sort | Stevenson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Archaea and Bacteria constitute a majority of life systems on Earth but have long been considered inferior to Eukarya in terms of solute tolerance. Whereas the most halophilic prokaryotes are known for an ability to multiply at saturated NaCl (water activity (a(w)) 0.755) some xerophilic fungi can germinate, usually at high-sugar concentrations, at values as low as 0.650–0.605 a(w). Here, we present evidence that halophilic prokayotes can grow down to water activities of <0.755 for Halanaerobium lacusrosei (0.748), Halobacterium strain 004.1 (0.728), Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 and Halococcus morrhuae (0.717), Haloquadratum walsbyi (0.709), Halococcus salifodinae (0.693), Halobacterium noricense (0.687), Natrinema pallidum (0.681) and haloarchaeal strains GN-2 and GN-5 (0.635 a(w)). Furthermore, extrapolation of growth curves (prone to giving conservative estimates) indicated theoretical minima down to 0.611 a(w) for extreme, obligately halophilic Archaea and Bacteria. These were compared with minima for the most solute-tolerant Bacteria in high-sugar (or other non-saline) media (Mycobacterium spp., Tetragenococcus halophilus, Saccharibacter floricola, Staphylococcus aureus and so on) and eukaryotic microbes in saline (Wallemia spp., Basipetospora halophila, Dunaliella spp. and so on) and high-sugar substrates (for example, Xeromyces bisporus, Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, Aspergillus and Eurotium spp.). We also manipulated the balance of chaotropic and kosmotropic stressors for the extreme, xerophilic fungi Aspergillus penicilloides and X. bisporus and, via this approach, their established water-activity limits for mycelial growth (∼0.65) were reduced to 0.640. Furthermore, extrapolations indicated theoretical limits of 0.632 and 0.636 a(w) for A. penicilloides and X. bisporus, respectively. Collectively, these findings suggest that there is a common water-activity limit that is determined by physicochemical constraints for the three domains of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4438321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44383212015-06-01 Is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life? Stevenson, Andrew Cray, Jonathan A Williams, Jim P Santos, Ricardo Sahay, Richa Neuenkirchen, Nils McClure, Colin D Grant, Irene R Houghton, Jonathan DR Quinn, John P Timson, David J Patil, Satish V Singhal, Rekha S Antón, Josefa Dijksterhuis, Jan Hocking, Ailsa D Lievens, Bart Rangel, Drauzio E N Voytek, Mary A Gunde-Cimerman, Nina Oren, Aharon Timmis, Kenneth N McGenity, Terry J Hallsworth, John E ISME J Original Article Archaea and Bacteria constitute a majority of life systems on Earth but have long been considered inferior to Eukarya in terms of solute tolerance. Whereas the most halophilic prokaryotes are known for an ability to multiply at saturated NaCl (water activity (a(w)) 0.755) some xerophilic fungi can germinate, usually at high-sugar concentrations, at values as low as 0.650–0.605 a(w). Here, we present evidence that halophilic prokayotes can grow down to water activities of <0.755 for Halanaerobium lacusrosei (0.748), Halobacterium strain 004.1 (0.728), Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 and Halococcus morrhuae (0.717), Haloquadratum walsbyi (0.709), Halococcus salifodinae (0.693), Halobacterium noricense (0.687), Natrinema pallidum (0.681) and haloarchaeal strains GN-2 and GN-5 (0.635 a(w)). Furthermore, extrapolation of growth curves (prone to giving conservative estimates) indicated theoretical minima down to 0.611 a(w) for extreme, obligately halophilic Archaea and Bacteria. These were compared with minima for the most solute-tolerant Bacteria in high-sugar (or other non-saline) media (Mycobacterium spp., Tetragenococcus halophilus, Saccharibacter floricola, Staphylococcus aureus and so on) and eukaryotic microbes in saline (Wallemia spp., Basipetospora halophila, Dunaliella spp. and so on) and high-sugar substrates (for example, Xeromyces bisporus, Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, Aspergillus and Eurotium spp.). We also manipulated the balance of chaotropic and kosmotropic stressors for the extreme, xerophilic fungi Aspergillus penicilloides and X. bisporus and, via this approach, their established water-activity limits for mycelial growth (∼0.65) were reduced to 0.640. Furthermore, extrapolations indicated theoretical limits of 0.632 and 0.636 a(w) for A. penicilloides and X. bisporus, respectively. Collectively, these findings suggest that there is a common water-activity limit that is determined by physicochemical constraints for the three domains of life. Nature Publishing Group 2015-06 2014-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4438321/ /pubmed/25500507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.219 Text en Copyright © 2015 International Society for Microbial Ecology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Stevenson, Andrew Cray, Jonathan A Williams, Jim P Santos, Ricardo Sahay, Richa Neuenkirchen, Nils McClure, Colin D Grant, Irene R Houghton, Jonathan DR Quinn, John P Timson, David J Patil, Satish V Singhal, Rekha S Antón, Josefa Dijksterhuis, Jan Hocking, Ailsa D Lievens, Bart Rangel, Drauzio E N Voytek, Mary A Gunde-Cimerman, Nina Oren, Aharon Timmis, Kenneth N McGenity, Terry J Hallsworth, John E Is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life? |
title | Is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life? |
title_full | Is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life? |
title_fullStr | Is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life? |
title_short | Is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life? |
title_sort | is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4438321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25500507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.219 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stevensonandrew isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT crayjonathana isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT williamsjimp isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT santosricardo isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT sahayricha isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT neuenkirchennils isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT mcclurecolind isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT grantirener isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT houghtonjonathandr isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT quinnjohnp isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT timsondavidj isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT patilsatishv isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT singhalrekhas isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT antonjosefa isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT dijksterhuisjan isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT hockingailsad isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT lievensbart isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT rangeldrauzioen isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT voytekmarya isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT gundecimermannina isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT orenaharon isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT timmiskennethn isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT mcgenityterryj isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife AT hallsworthjohne isthereacommonwateractivitylimitforthethreedomainsoflife |