Cargando…

Do asymptomatic patients have normal function after percutaneous fixation of the posterior pelvic ring? A case-control pilot study

BACKGROUND: Following treatment of a posterior pelvic disruption, residual deformity or associated injuries can adversely affect functional recovery. No study has been performed on gait and functional outcome after closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation (CRPSF) of posterior pelvic disrupti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salari, Pooria, Cannada, Lisa K, Moed, Berton R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4438342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25982104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0190-z
_version_ 1782372313507823616
author Salari, Pooria
Cannada, Lisa K
Moed, Berton R
author_facet Salari, Pooria
Cannada, Lisa K
Moed, Berton R
author_sort Salari, Pooria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Following treatment of a posterior pelvic disruption, residual deformity or associated injuries can adversely affect functional recovery. No study has been performed on gait and functional outcome after closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation (CRPSF) of posterior pelvic disruption in clinically asymptomatic patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if gait and functional outcome are different from normal in asymptomatic patients with a posterior pelvic injury after CRPSF, serving as a pilot study in this regard. METHODS: Six asymptomatic patients with no grossly evident gait abnormality, treated by CRPSF for a posterior pelvic disruption, were included in the study (SG). A control group (CG) of six healthy volunteers was created. All participants completed the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2), the Majeed Pelvic Score (MPS), and the Iowa Pelvic Score (IPS). In addition, the participants’ gait was analyzed. RESULTS: Pelvic drop was significantly smaller on the uninjured side in the SG when compared to the injured side in the SG. There was no significant difference between the injured and uninjured side for other gait parameters within the SG. Knee angle at initial contact was significantly greater on the injured side when compared to the CG. The SG scored statistically worse than the CG on the Physical Component Summary part of the SF-12v2. However, when evaluated by age group using national mean scores, the SG differences were minimal. All six patients in our study scored “excellent” on both MPS and IPS. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having subclinical alterations in gait, asymptomatic pelvic ring injured patients show minimal, if any, evidence of impaired functional outcome following successful reduction of a posterior pelvic disruption treated by CRPSF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4438342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44383422015-05-21 Do asymptomatic patients have normal function after percutaneous fixation of the posterior pelvic ring? A case-control pilot study Salari, Pooria Cannada, Lisa K Moed, Berton R J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Following treatment of a posterior pelvic disruption, residual deformity or associated injuries can adversely affect functional recovery. No study has been performed on gait and functional outcome after closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation (CRPSF) of posterior pelvic disruption in clinically asymptomatic patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if gait and functional outcome are different from normal in asymptomatic patients with a posterior pelvic injury after CRPSF, serving as a pilot study in this regard. METHODS: Six asymptomatic patients with no grossly evident gait abnormality, treated by CRPSF for a posterior pelvic disruption, were included in the study (SG). A control group (CG) of six healthy volunteers was created. All participants completed the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2), the Majeed Pelvic Score (MPS), and the Iowa Pelvic Score (IPS). In addition, the participants’ gait was analyzed. RESULTS: Pelvic drop was significantly smaller on the uninjured side in the SG when compared to the injured side in the SG. There was no significant difference between the injured and uninjured side for other gait parameters within the SG. Knee angle at initial contact was significantly greater on the injured side when compared to the CG. The SG scored statistically worse than the CG on the Physical Component Summary part of the SF-12v2. However, when evaluated by age group using national mean scores, the SG differences were minimal. All six patients in our study scored “excellent” on both MPS and IPS. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having subclinical alterations in gait, asymptomatic pelvic ring injured patients show minimal, if any, evidence of impaired functional outcome following successful reduction of a posterior pelvic disruption treated by CRPSF. BioMed Central 2015-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4438342/ /pubmed/25982104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0190-z Text en © Salari et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Salari, Pooria
Cannada, Lisa K
Moed, Berton R
Do asymptomatic patients have normal function after percutaneous fixation of the posterior pelvic ring? A case-control pilot study
title Do asymptomatic patients have normal function after percutaneous fixation of the posterior pelvic ring? A case-control pilot study
title_full Do asymptomatic patients have normal function after percutaneous fixation of the posterior pelvic ring? A case-control pilot study
title_fullStr Do asymptomatic patients have normal function after percutaneous fixation of the posterior pelvic ring? A case-control pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Do asymptomatic patients have normal function after percutaneous fixation of the posterior pelvic ring? A case-control pilot study
title_short Do asymptomatic patients have normal function after percutaneous fixation of the posterior pelvic ring? A case-control pilot study
title_sort do asymptomatic patients have normal function after percutaneous fixation of the posterior pelvic ring? a case-control pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4438342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25982104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0190-z
work_keys_str_mv AT salaripooria doasymptomaticpatientshavenormalfunctionafterpercutaneousfixationoftheposteriorpelvicringacasecontrolpilotstudy
AT cannadalisak doasymptomaticpatientshavenormalfunctionafterpercutaneousfixationoftheposteriorpelvicringacasecontrolpilotstudy
AT moedbertonr doasymptomaticpatientshavenormalfunctionafterpercutaneousfixationoftheposteriorpelvicringacasecontrolpilotstudy