Cargando…
Preemptive dosage reduction of nadroparin in patients with renal failure: a retrospective case series
BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are frequently used to treat arterial and venous thrombo-embolic events. LMWHs accumulate with renal failure, but only limited clinical data regarding appropriate dosage adjustments are available. Nevertheless, LMWHs are routinely used in these patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4438398/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26064511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sft083 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are frequently used to treat arterial and venous thrombo-embolic events. LMWHs accumulate with renal failure, but only limited clinical data regarding appropriate dosage adjustments are available. Nevertheless, LMWHs are routinely used in these patients worldwide. Although many clinics apply renal function-based dosage reductions, anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) activity is not measured routinely. METHODS: We determined anti-Xa activity in 51 patients with MDRD-eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), treated with therapeutic doses of nadroparin according to a standard, renal function-based guideline. RESULTS: An a priori dosage reduction resulted in anti-Xa activity within, below and above the reference range in 51, 30 and 19% of the measurements, respectively. Treatment resulted in different anti-Xa activities compared with dosages that were not given according to official advice (P < 0.001). Anti-Xa values increased with longer treatment duration (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: A preemptive fixed reduction (25%) of the nadroparin dosage in all patients with renal failure seems appropriate. However, because target anti-Xa activities were reached in only half of the patients, we submit that the use of nadroparin, dosage reduction and monitoring of anti-Xa activity in combination with clinical outcome monitoring in this patient population urgently needs further investigation. |
---|