Cargando…

Oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking

BACKGROUND: Translational biomedical research relies on the availability of human tissue to explore disease aetiology and prognostic factors, with the objective of developing better targeted treatments. The establishment of biobanks poses ongoing ethical considerations in relation to donors. This is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bryant, Jamie, Sanson-Fisher, Rob, Fradgley, Elizabeth, Regan, Timothy, Hobden, Breanne, Ackland, Stephen P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4438453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25981796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1416-5
_version_ 1782372335826763776
author Bryant, Jamie
Sanson-Fisher, Rob
Fradgley, Elizabeth
Regan, Timothy
Hobden, Breanne
Ackland, Stephen P.
author_facet Bryant, Jamie
Sanson-Fisher, Rob
Fradgley, Elizabeth
Regan, Timothy
Hobden, Breanne
Ackland, Stephen P.
author_sort Bryant, Jamie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Translational biomedical research relies on the availability of human tissue to explore disease aetiology and prognostic factors, with the objective of developing better targeted treatments. The establishment of biobanks poses ongoing ethical considerations in relation to donors. This is a quantitative study exploring medical oncology patients’ preferences for contributing to tissue biobanks. METHODS: The objectives of this study were to explore oncology patients’ preferences about tissue banking, including: 1) willingness to donate; 2) factors influencing donation decisions; 3) preferences about the use of donated tissue including permission systems, data linkage, and communication about research findings to donors. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in two tertiary oncology outpatient clinics. Eligible patients were approached by volunteers to complete a touchscreen survey in waiting rooms or while receiving intravenous therapy. Consenting participants completed demographic questions and received up to 12 previously validated items exploring preferences for donating tissue. RESULTS: 224 oncology outpatients participated over a ten month period (69.1 % consent rate; 64.4 % completion rate). Most participants were female (54 %), were a mean age of 62 years, and diagnosed with breast (26 %) and bowel (20 %) cancer. Most participants indicated willingness to donate tissue (84 %) and for their sample to be stored for future use (96 %). Participants preferred a blanket consent approach (71 %), samples to be linked to medical records (62 %) and for general results of the research (79 %) to be provided to them. Factors influencing willingness to donate tissue included personal (85 %) or familial health benefits (88 %) and a sense of duty to future patients (82 %). CONCLUSIONS: The overwhelming majority of oncology patients are willing to participate in a tissue bank, providing some support to explore ‘opt-out’ models of consent. To enhance patient acceptability, tissue banking programs should: (i) consider allowing blanket informed consent as well as opt-in models of consent; (ii) develop protocols allowing feedback of information about samples in line with patient preferences; (iii) provide clear information to potential donors about the benefits arising from donation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4438453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44384532015-05-21 Oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking Bryant, Jamie Sanson-Fisher, Rob Fradgley, Elizabeth Regan, Timothy Hobden, Breanne Ackland, Stephen P. BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Translational biomedical research relies on the availability of human tissue to explore disease aetiology and prognostic factors, with the objective of developing better targeted treatments. The establishment of biobanks poses ongoing ethical considerations in relation to donors. This is a quantitative study exploring medical oncology patients’ preferences for contributing to tissue biobanks. METHODS: The objectives of this study were to explore oncology patients’ preferences about tissue banking, including: 1) willingness to donate; 2) factors influencing donation decisions; 3) preferences about the use of donated tissue including permission systems, data linkage, and communication about research findings to donors. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in two tertiary oncology outpatient clinics. Eligible patients were approached by volunteers to complete a touchscreen survey in waiting rooms or while receiving intravenous therapy. Consenting participants completed demographic questions and received up to 12 previously validated items exploring preferences for donating tissue. RESULTS: 224 oncology outpatients participated over a ten month period (69.1 % consent rate; 64.4 % completion rate). Most participants were female (54 %), were a mean age of 62 years, and diagnosed with breast (26 %) and bowel (20 %) cancer. Most participants indicated willingness to donate tissue (84 %) and for their sample to be stored for future use (96 %). Participants preferred a blanket consent approach (71 %), samples to be linked to medical records (62 %) and for general results of the research (79 %) to be provided to them. Factors influencing willingness to donate tissue included personal (85 %) or familial health benefits (88 %) and a sense of duty to future patients (82 %). CONCLUSIONS: The overwhelming majority of oncology patients are willing to participate in a tissue bank, providing some support to explore ‘opt-out’ models of consent. To enhance patient acceptability, tissue banking programs should: (i) consider allowing blanket informed consent as well as opt-in models of consent; (ii) develop protocols allowing feedback of information about samples in line with patient preferences; (iii) provide clear information to potential donors about the benefits arising from donation. BioMed Central 2015-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4438453/ /pubmed/25981796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1416-5 Text en © Bryant et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bryant, Jamie
Sanson-Fisher, Rob
Fradgley, Elizabeth
Regan, Timothy
Hobden, Breanne
Ackland, Stephen P.
Oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking
title Oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking
title_full Oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking
title_fullStr Oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking
title_full_unstemmed Oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking
title_short Oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking
title_sort oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4438453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25981796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1416-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bryantjamie oncologypatientsoverwhelminglysupporttissuebanking
AT sansonfisherrob oncologypatientsoverwhelminglysupporttissuebanking
AT fradgleyelizabeth oncologypatientsoverwhelminglysupporttissuebanking
AT regantimothy oncologypatientsoverwhelminglysupporttissuebanking
AT hobdenbreanne oncologypatientsoverwhelminglysupporttissuebanking
AT acklandstephenp oncologypatientsoverwhelminglysupporttissuebanking