Cargando…
Mechanomyography versus Electromyography, in monitoring the muscular fatigue
BACKGROUND: The use of the mechanomyogram (MMG) which detects muscular vibrations generated by fused individual fiber twitches has been refined. The study addresses a comparison of the MMG and surface electromyogram (SEMG) in monitoring muscle fatigue. METHODS: The SEMG and MMG were recorded simulta...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC443861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12625837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-2-3 |
_version_ | 1782121557161672704 |
---|---|
author | Tarata, Mihai T |
author_facet | Tarata, Mihai T |
author_sort | Tarata, Mihai T |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of the mechanomyogram (MMG) which detects muscular vibrations generated by fused individual fiber twitches has been refined. The study addresses a comparison of the MMG and surface electromyogram (SEMG) in monitoring muscle fatigue. METHODS: The SEMG and MMG were recorded simultaneously from the same territory of motor units in two muscles (Biceps, Brachioradialis) of the human (n = 18), during sustained contraction at 25 % MVC (maximal voluntary contraction). RESULTS: The RMS (root mean square) of the SEMG and MMG increased with advancing fatigue; MF (median frequency) of the PSD (power density spectra) progressively decreased from the onset of the contraction. These findings (both muscles, all subjects), demonstrate both through the SEMG and MMG a central component of the fatigue. The MF regression slopes of MMG were closer to each other between men and women (Biceps 1.55%; Brachialis 13.2%) than were the SEMG MF slopes (Biceps 25.32%; Brachialis 17.72%), which shows a smaller inter-sex variability for the MMG vs. SEMG. CONCLUSION: The study presents another quantitative comparison (MF, RMS) of MMG and SEMG, showing that MMG signal can be used for indication of the degree of muscle activation and for monitoring the muscle fatigue when the application of SEMG is not feasible (chronical implants, adverse environments contaminated by electrical noise). |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-443861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-4438612003-03-17 Mechanomyography versus Electromyography, in monitoring the muscular fatigue Tarata, Mihai T Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: The use of the mechanomyogram (MMG) which detects muscular vibrations generated by fused individual fiber twitches has been refined. The study addresses a comparison of the MMG and surface electromyogram (SEMG) in monitoring muscle fatigue. METHODS: The SEMG and MMG were recorded simultaneously from the same territory of motor units in two muscles (Biceps, Brachioradialis) of the human (n = 18), during sustained contraction at 25 % MVC (maximal voluntary contraction). RESULTS: The RMS (root mean square) of the SEMG and MMG increased with advancing fatigue; MF (median frequency) of the PSD (power density spectra) progressively decreased from the onset of the contraction. These findings (both muscles, all subjects), demonstrate both through the SEMG and MMG a central component of the fatigue. The MF regression slopes of MMG were closer to each other between men and women (Biceps 1.55%; Brachialis 13.2%) than were the SEMG MF slopes (Biceps 25.32%; Brachialis 17.72%), which shows a smaller inter-sex variability for the MMG vs. SEMG. CONCLUSION: The study presents another quantitative comparison (MF, RMS) of MMG and SEMG, showing that MMG signal can be used for indication of the degree of muscle activation and for monitoring the muscle fatigue when the application of SEMG is not feasible (chronical implants, adverse environments contaminated by electrical noise). BioMed Central 2003-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC443861/ /pubmed/12625837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-2-3 Text en Copyright © 2003 Tarata; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Tarata, Mihai T Mechanomyography versus Electromyography, in monitoring the muscular fatigue |
title | Mechanomyography versus Electromyography, in monitoring the muscular fatigue |
title_full | Mechanomyography versus Electromyography, in monitoring the muscular fatigue |
title_fullStr | Mechanomyography versus Electromyography, in monitoring the muscular fatigue |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanomyography versus Electromyography, in monitoring the muscular fatigue |
title_short | Mechanomyography versus Electromyography, in monitoring the muscular fatigue |
title_sort | mechanomyography versus electromyography, in monitoring the muscular fatigue |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC443861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12625837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-2-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taratamihait mechanomyographyversuselectromyographyinmonitoringthemuscularfatigue |