Cargando…

Comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets

AIM: The frictional resistance encountered during sliding mechanics has been well established in the orthodontic literature, and it consists of complex interactions between the bracket, archwire, and method of ligation the claim of reduced friction with self-ligating brackets is often cited as a pri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kannan, M. S., Murali, R. V., Kishorekumar, S., Gnanashanmugam, K., Jayanth, V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26015687
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.155852
_version_ 1782372526995800064
author Kannan, M. S.
Murali, R. V.
Kishorekumar, S.
Gnanashanmugam, K.
Jayanth, V.
author_facet Kannan, M. S.
Murali, R. V.
Kishorekumar, S.
Gnanashanmugam, K.
Jayanth, V.
author_sort Kannan, M. S.
collection PubMed
description AIM: The frictional resistance encountered during sliding mechanics has been well established in the orthodontic literature, and it consists of complex interactions between the bracket, archwire, and method of ligation the claim of reduced friction with self-ligating brackets is often cited as a primary advantage over conventional brackets. This study was done to compare and evaluate the frictional forces generated between fully esthetic brackets and semi-aesthetic self-ligating brackets, which are of passive form and SEM (scanning electron microscope) study of the Brackets after Frictional evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two types of self-ligating esthetic brackets, Damon clear (Ormco) made of fully ceramic and Opal (Ultradent Products, USA) and, Two types of self-ligating semi-esthetic brackets, Clarity SL (3M Unitek) and Damon 3 (Ormco) both of which are made of ceramic with metal slot. Arch wires with different dimensions and quality 17 × 25, 19 × 25 Titanium Molybdenum Alloy (TMA) and 17 × 25, 19 × 25 stainless steel that came from plain strands of wire were used for frictional comparison test. The brackets used in this study had 0.022 × 0.028 inch slot. RESULTS: The statistical tests showed significantly smaller amount of kinetic frictional forces is generated by Damon 3 (semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets). For each wire used, Damon 3 displayed significantly lower frictional forces (P ≤ 0.05) than any of the self-ligating system, followed by Opal (fully esthetic self-ligating brackets) which generated smaller amount of frictional forces but relatively on the higher side when compared with Damon 3. Damon clear (fully esthetic self-ligating brackets) generated the maximum amount of kinetic forces with all types of wire dimensions and properties when compared to the other three types of self-ligating system. Clarity SL (semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets) generated smaller amount of frictional forces when compared with Damon clear and relatively higher amount of frictional forces when compared to Opal and Damon 3
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4439647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44396472015-05-26 Comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets Kannan, M. S. Murali, R. V. Kishorekumar, S. Gnanashanmugam, K. Jayanth, V. J Pharm Bioallied Sci Dental Science - Research Article AIM: The frictional resistance encountered during sliding mechanics has been well established in the orthodontic literature, and it consists of complex interactions between the bracket, archwire, and method of ligation the claim of reduced friction with self-ligating brackets is often cited as a primary advantage over conventional brackets. This study was done to compare and evaluate the frictional forces generated between fully esthetic brackets and semi-aesthetic self-ligating brackets, which are of passive form and SEM (scanning electron microscope) study of the Brackets after Frictional evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two types of self-ligating esthetic brackets, Damon clear (Ormco) made of fully ceramic and Opal (Ultradent Products, USA) and, Two types of self-ligating semi-esthetic brackets, Clarity SL (3M Unitek) and Damon 3 (Ormco) both of which are made of ceramic with metal slot. Arch wires with different dimensions and quality 17 × 25, 19 × 25 Titanium Molybdenum Alloy (TMA) and 17 × 25, 19 × 25 stainless steel that came from plain strands of wire were used for frictional comparison test. The brackets used in this study had 0.022 × 0.028 inch slot. RESULTS: The statistical tests showed significantly smaller amount of kinetic frictional forces is generated by Damon 3 (semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets). For each wire used, Damon 3 displayed significantly lower frictional forces (P ≤ 0.05) than any of the self-ligating system, followed by Opal (fully esthetic self-ligating brackets) which generated smaller amount of frictional forces but relatively on the higher side when compared with Damon 3. Damon clear (fully esthetic self-ligating brackets) generated the maximum amount of kinetic forces with all types of wire dimensions and properties when compared to the other three types of self-ligating system. Clarity SL (semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets) generated smaller amount of frictional forces when compared with Damon clear and relatively higher amount of frictional forces when compared to Opal and Damon 3 Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4439647/ /pubmed/26015687 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.155852 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Dental Science - Research Article
Kannan, M. S.
Murali, R. V.
Kishorekumar, S.
Gnanashanmugam, K.
Jayanth, V.
Comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets
title Comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets
title_full Comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets
title_fullStr Comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets
title_short Comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets
title_sort comparison of frictional resistance of esthetic and semi-esthetic self-ligating brackets
topic Dental Science - Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26015687
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.155852
work_keys_str_mv AT kannanms comparisonoffrictionalresistanceofestheticandsemiestheticselfligatingbrackets
AT muralirv comparisonoffrictionalresistanceofestheticandsemiestheticselfligatingbrackets
AT kishorekumars comparisonoffrictionalresistanceofestheticandsemiestheticselfligatingbrackets
AT gnanashanmugamk comparisonoffrictionalresistanceofestheticandsemiestheticselfligatingbrackets
AT jayanthv comparisonoffrictionalresistanceofestheticandsemiestheticselfligatingbrackets