Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of the three different surface treatments – conventional, laser and Nano technology methods in enhancing the surface characteristics of commercially pure titanium discs and their effects on cell adhesion: An in vitro study
The surface area of the titanium dental implant materials can be increased by surface treatments without altering their shape and form, thereby increasing the biologic properties of the biomaterial. A good biomaterial helps in early cell adhesion and cell signaling. In this study, the commercially p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26015762 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.155817 |
_version_ | 1782372544616071168 |
---|---|
author | Vignesh, Nayar, Sanjna Bhuminathan, Mahadevan, Santhosh, S. |
author_facet | Vignesh, Nayar, Sanjna Bhuminathan, Mahadevan, Santhosh, S. |
author_sort | Vignesh, |
collection | PubMed |
description | The surface area of the titanium dental implant materials can be increased by surface treatments without altering their shape and form, thereby increasing the biologic properties of the biomaterial. A good biomaterial helps in early cell adhesion and cell signaling. In this study, the commercially pure titanium surfaces were prepared to enable machined surfaces to form a control material and to be compared with sandblasted and acid-etched surfaces, laser treated surfaces and titanium dioxide (20 nm) Nano-particle coated surfaces. The surface elements were characterized. The biocompatibility was evaluated by cell culture in vitro using L929 fibroblasts. The results suggested that the titanium dioxide Nano-particle coated surfaces had good osteoconductivity and can be used as a potential method for coating the biomaterial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4439722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44397222015-05-26 Comparative evaluation of the three different surface treatments – conventional, laser and Nano technology methods in enhancing the surface characteristics of commercially pure titanium discs and their effects on cell adhesion: An in vitro study Vignesh, Nayar, Sanjna Bhuminathan, Mahadevan, Santhosh, S. J Pharm Bioallied Sci Dental Science - Research Article The surface area of the titanium dental implant materials can be increased by surface treatments without altering their shape and form, thereby increasing the biologic properties of the biomaterial. A good biomaterial helps in early cell adhesion and cell signaling. In this study, the commercially pure titanium surfaces were prepared to enable machined surfaces to form a control material and to be compared with sandblasted and acid-etched surfaces, laser treated surfaces and titanium dioxide (20 nm) Nano-particle coated surfaces. The surface elements were characterized. The biocompatibility was evaluated by cell culture in vitro using L929 fibroblasts. The results suggested that the titanium dioxide Nano-particle coated surfaces had good osteoconductivity and can be used as a potential method for coating the biomaterial. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4439722/ /pubmed/26015762 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.155817 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Dental Science - Research Article Vignesh, Nayar, Sanjna Bhuminathan, Mahadevan, Santhosh, S. Comparative evaluation of the three different surface treatments – conventional, laser and Nano technology methods in enhancing the surface characteristics of commercially pure titanium discs and their effects on cell adhesion: An in vitro study |
title | Comparative evaluation of the three different surface treatments – conventional, laser and Nano technology methods in enhancing the surface characteristics of commercially pure titanium discs and their effects on cell adhesion: An in vitro study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of the three different surface treatments – conventional, laser and Nano technology methods in enhancing the surface characteristics of commercially pure titanium discs and their effects on cell adhesion: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of the three different surface treatments – conventional, laser and Nano technology methods in enhancing the surface characteristics of commercially pure titanium discs and their effects on cell adhesion: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of the three different surface treatments – conventional, laser and Nano technology methods in enhancing the surface characteristics of commercially pure titanium discs and their effects on cell adhesion: An in vitro study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of the three different surface treatments – conventional, laser and Nano technology methods in enhancing the surface characteristics of commercially pure titanium discs and their effects on cell adhesion: An in vitro study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of the three different surface treatments – conventional, laser and nano technology methods in enhancing the surface characteristics of commercially pure titanium discs and their effects on cell adhesion: an in vitro study |
topic | Dental Science - Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26015762 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.155817 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vignesh comparativeevaluationofthethreedifferentsurfacetreatmentsconventionallaserandnanotechnologymethodsinenhancingthesurfacecharacteristicsofcommerciallypuretitaniumdiscsandtheireffectsoncelladhesionaninvitrostudy AT nayarsanjna comparativeevaluationofthethreedifferentsurfacetreatmentsconventionallaserandnanotechnologymethodsinenhancingthesurfacecharacteristicsofcommerciallypuretitaniumdiscsandtheireffectsoncelladhesionaninvitrostudy AT bhuminathan comparativeevaluationofthethreedifferentsurfacetreatmentsconventionallaserandnanotechnologymethodsinenhancingthesurfacecharacteristicsofcommerciallypuretitaniumdiscsandtheireffectsoncelladhesionaninvitrostudy AT mahadevan comparativeevaluationofthethreedifferentsurfacetreatmentsconventionallaserandnanotechnologymethodsinenhancingthesurfacecharacteristicsofcommerciallypuretitaniumdiscsandtheireffectsoncelladhesionaninvitrostudy AT santhoshs comparativeevaluationofthethreedifferentsurfacetreatmentsconventionallaserandnanotechnologymethodsinenhancingthesurfacecharacteristicsofcommerciallypuretitaniumdiscsandtheireffectsoncelladhesionaninvitrostudy |