Cargando…

Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy can be an effective and safe technique for decompression of the nerve root utilizing minimally invasive muscle splitting with routine outpatient discharge. This technique has come under scrutiny calling into question t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Branch, Byron C., Hilton, Donald L., Watts, Clark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26009705
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.157308
_version_ 1782372555498192896
author Branch, Byron C.
Hilton, Donald L.
Watts, Clark
author_facet Branch, Byron C.
Hilton, Donald L.
Watts, Clark
author_sort Branch, Byron C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy can be an effective and safe technique for decompression of the nerve root utilizing minimally invasive muscle splitting with routine outpatient discharge. This technique has come under scrutiny calling into question the associated learning curve, a subjective limited exposure provided, and an argument that the risks and complications are largely unknown. In response to previously published critiques, this study aims to describe the outcomes and complications associated with this technique in a large patient series. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed from 1999 to 2013 capturing a single surgeon's experience with the minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy technique from a single institution, encompassing 463 patients. Surgical outcome documented at follow-up and complications were obtained from this patient series. Additional variables analyzed include: Hospital length of stay, number of levels operated, targeted root for decompression, side operated, length of surgery, and estimated blood loss. RESULTS: Outpatient discharge was achieved in 91.6% of cases. There were 10 complications (2.2%) among the 463 patients undergoing this technique from 1999 to 2013. Patients were followed for an average of 1 year and 2 months postoperatively. Improvement from the preoperative condition was observed in 98.2% of patients and excellent outcomes with patients reporting complete relief of symptoms with no or mild residual discomfort was seen in 92.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with open techniques, minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy demonstrates comparable, if not superior, complication rates, and patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4439784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44397842015-05-25 Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy Branch, Byron C. Hilton, Donald L. Watts, Clark Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy can be an effective and safe technique for decompression of the nerve root utilizing minimally invasive muscle splitting with routine outpatient discharge. This technique has come under scrutiny calling into question the associated learning curve, a subjective limited exposure provided, and an argument that the risks and complications are largely unknown. In response to previously published critiques, this study aims to describe the outcomes and complications associated with this technique in a large patient series. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed from 1999 to 2013 capturing a single surgeon's experience with the minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy technique from a single institution, encompassing 463 patients. Surgical outcome documented at follow-up and complications were obtained from this patient series. Additional variables analyzed include: Hospital length of stay, number of levels operated, targeted root for decompression, side operated, length of surgery, and estimated blood loss. RESULTS: Outpatient discharge was achieved in 91.6% of cases. There were 10 complications (2.2%) among the 463 patients undergoing this technique from 1999 to 2013. Patients were followed for an average of 1 year and 2 months postoperatively. Improvement from the preoperative condition was observed in 98.2% of patients and excellent outcomes with patients reporting complete relief of symptoms with no or mild residual discomfort was seen in 92.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with open techniques, minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy demonstrates comparable, if not superior, complication rates, and patient outcomes. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4439784/ /pubmed/26009705 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.157308 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Branch BC. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Branch, Byron C.
Hilton, Donald L.
Watts, Clark
Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy
title Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy
title_full Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy
title_fullStr Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy
title_short Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy
title_sort minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26009705
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.157308
work_keys_str_mv AT branchbyronc minimallyinvasivetubularaccessforposteriorcervicalforaminotomy
AT hiltondonaldl minimallyinvasivetubularaccessforposteriorcervicalforaminotomy
AT wattsclark minimallyinvasivetubularaccessforposteriorcervicalforaminotomy