Cargando…

Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) and ultramorphological characterization of glass ionomer (GI) cements; conventional GI cement (Fuji IX, CGI), resin modified GI (Fuji II LC, RMGI) and nano-ionomer (Ketac N100, NI) to enamel, dentin and cementum subs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Wakeel, Aliaa Mohamed, Elkassas, Dina Wafik, Yousry, Mai Mahmoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038646
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156799
_version_ 1782372557129777152
author El Wakeel, Aliaa Mohamed
Elkassas, Dina Wafik
Yousry, Mai Mahmoud
author_facet El Wakeel, Aliaa Mohamed
Elkassas, Dina Wafik
Yousry, Mai Mahmoud
author_sort El Wakeel, Aliaa Mohamed
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) and ultramorphological characterization of glass ionomer (GI) cements; conventional GI cement (Fuji IX, CGI), resin modified GI (Fuji II LC, RMGI) and nano-ionomer (Ketac N100, NI) to enamel, dentin and cementum substrates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five lower molars were sectioned above the cemento-enamel junction. The occlusal surfaces were ground flat to obtain enamel and dentin substrates, meanwhile the cervical one-third of the root portion were utilized to evaluate the bonding efficacy to cementum substrate. Each substrate received microcylinders from the three tested materials; which were applied according to manufacturer instructions. μSBS was assessed using a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post-hoc test. Modes of failure were examined using stereomicroscope at ×25 magnification. Interfacial analysis of the bonded specimens was carried out using environmental field emission scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA revealed that materials, substrates and their interaction had a statistically significant effect on the mean μSBS values at P values; ˂0.0001, 0.0108 and 0.0037 respectively. RMGI showed statistically significant the highest μSBS values to all examined tooth substrates. CGI and RMGI show substrate independent bonding efficiency, meanwhile; NI showed higher μSBS values to dentin and cementum compared to enamel. CONCLUSION: Despite technological development of GI materials, mainly the nano-particles use, better results have not been achieved for both investigations, when compared to RMGI, independent of tooth substrate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4439842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44398422015-06-02 Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study El Wakeel, Aliaa Mohamed Elkassas, Dina Wafik Yousry, Mai Mahmoud Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the microshear bond strength (μSBS) and ultramorphological characterization of glass ionomer (GI) cements; conventional GI cement (Fuji IX, CGI), resin modified GI (Fuji II LC, RMGI) and nano-ionomer (Ketac N100, NI) to enamel, dentin and cementum substrates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five lower molars were sectioned above the cemento-enamel junction. The occlusal surfaces were ground flat to obtain enamel and dentin substrates, meanwhile the cervical one-third of the root portion were utilized to evaluate the bonding efficacy to cementum substrate. Each substrate received microcylinders from the three tested materials; which were applied according to manufacturer instructions. μSBS was assessed using a universal testing machine. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post-hoc test. Modes of failure were examined using stereomicroscope at ×25 magnification. Interfacial analysis of the bonded specimens was carried out using environmental field emission scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA revealed that materials, substrates and their interaction had a statistically significant effect on the mean μSBS values at P values; ˂0.0001, 0.0108 and 0.0037 respectively. RMGI showed statistically significant the highest μSBS values to all examined tooth substrates. CGI and RMGI show substrate independent bonding efficiency, meanwhile; NI showed higher μSBS values to dentin and cementum compared to enamel. CONCLUSION: Despite technological development of GI materials, mainly the nano-particles use, better results have not been achieved for both investigations, when compared to RMGI, independent of tooth substrate. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4439842/ /pubmed/26038646 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156799 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
El Wakeel, Aliaa Mohamed
Elkassas, Dina Wafik
Yousry, Mai Mahmoud
Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study
title Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study
title_full Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study
title_fullStr Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study
title_full_unstemmed Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study
title_short Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study
title_sort bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to different tooth substrates; microshear bond strength and scanning electron microscope study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038646
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156799
work_keys_str_mv AT elwakeelaliaamohamed bondingofcontemporaryglassionomercementstodifferenttoothsubstratesmicroshearbondstrengthandscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT elkassasdinawafik bondingofcontemporaryglassionomercementstodifferenttoothsubstratesmicroshearbondstrengthandscanningelectronmicroscopestudy
AT yousrymaimahmoud bondingofcontemporaryglassionomercementstodifferenttoothsubstratesmicroshearbondstrengthandscanningelectronmicroscopestudy