Cargando…
The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum residual root thickness (MRRT) of the danger zone after preflaring of the mesio-buccal (MB) canal of mandibular first molars using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden (GG) drills as coronal shapers by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT)....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038655 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156833 |
_version_ | 1782372559230074880 |
---|---|
author | Akhlaghi, Nahid Mohammadzadeh Bajgiran, Laleh Mohammadian Naghdi, Amirali Behrooz, Elaheh Khalilak, Zohreh |
author_facet | Akhlaghi, Nahid Mohammadzadeh Bajgiran, Laleh Mohammadian Naghdi, Amirali Behrooz, Elaheh Khalilak, Zohreh |
author_sort | Akhlaghi, Nahid Mohammadzadeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum residual root thickness (MRRT) of the danger zone after preflaring of the mesio-buccal (MB) canal of mandibular first molars using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden (GG) drills as coronal shapers by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, the initial CBCT scans of 75 MB canals of mandibular first molars were provided within 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm of the furcation level. The samples were divided into three groups. The samples of ProTaper and RaCe groups were prepared up to F2 and #25.04 as the master apical file (MAF), respectively. The coronal preparation of the samples in the GG group was done using GG drills #2, #3 and #4 and canals were prepared till MAF # 25. After obtaining the postinstrumentation images, the MRRT and the amount of removed dentin were analyzed by t-test and ANOVA statistical analyses. RESULTS: The GG drills removed significantly more dentin than RaCe at all the sections (P < 0.05) and more than ProTaper at 3 mm from the furcation. Statistically there was no significant difference between ProTaper and RaCe groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in MRRT between the groups (P > 0.05). The mean MRRT was not < 0.75 mm at all sections. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, when an appropriate root thickness is initially present, all of the instruments that were investigated may safely be used as coronal shapers in MB canals of mandibular first molars. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4439851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44398512015-06-02 The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study Akhlaghi, Nahid Mohammadzadeh Bajgiran, Laleh Mohammadian Naghdi, Amirali Behrooz, Elaheh Khalilak, Zohreh Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum residual root thickness (MRRT) of the danger zone after preflaring of the mesio-buccal (MB) canal of mandibular first molars using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden (GG) drills as coronal shapers by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, the initial CBCT scans of 75 MB canals of mandibular first molars were provided within 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm of the furcation level. The samples were divided into three groups. The samples of ProTaper and RaCe groups were prepared up to F2 and #25.04 as the master apical file (MAF), respectively. The coronal preparation of the samples in the GG group was done using GG drills #2, #3 and #4 and canals were prepared till MAF # 25. After obtaining the postinstrumentation images, the MRRT and the amount of removed dentin were analyzed by t-test and ANOVA statistical analyses. RESULTS: The GG drills removed significantly more dentin than RaCe at all the sections (P < 0.05) and more than ProTaper at 3 mm from the furcation. Statistically there was no significant difference between ProTaper and RaCe groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in MRRT between the groups (P > 0.05). The mean MRRT was not < 0.75 mm at all sections. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, when an appropriate root thickness is initially present, all of the instruments that were investigated may safely be used as coronal shapers in MB canals of mandibular first molars. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4439851/ /pubmed/26038655 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156833 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Akhlaghi, Nahid Mohammadzadeh Bajgiran, Laleh Mohammadian Naghdi, Amirali Behrooz, Elaheh Khalilak, Zohreh The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study |
title | The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study |
title_full | The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study |
title_fullStr | The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study |
title_full_unstemmed | The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study |
title_short | The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study |
title_sort | minimum residual root thickness after using protaper, race and gates-glidden drills: a cone beam computerized tomography study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038655 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156833 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akhlaghinahidmohammadzadeh theminimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy AT bajgiranlalehmohammadian theminimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy AT naghdiamirali theminimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy AT behroozelaheh theminimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy AT khalilakzohreh theminimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy AT akhlaghinahidmohammadzadeh minimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy AT bajgiranlalehmohammadian minimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy AT naghdiamirali minimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy AT behroozelaheh minimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy AT khalilakzohreh minimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy |