Cargando…

The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum residual root thickness (MRRT) of the danger zone after preflaring of the mesio-buccal (MB) canal of mandibular first molars using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden (GG) drills as coronal shapers by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akhlaghi, Nahid Mohammadzadeh, Bajgiran, Laleh Mohammadian, Naghdi, Amirali, Behrooz, Elaheh, Khalilak, Zohreh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038655
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156833
_version_ 1782372559230074880
author Akhlaghi, Nahid Mohammadzadeh
Bajgiran, Laleh Mohammadian
Naghdi, Amirali
Behrooz, Elaheh
Khalilak, Zohreh
author_facet Akhlaghi, Nahid Mohammadzadeh
Bajgiran, Laleh Mohammadian
Naghdi, Amirali
Behrooz, Elaheh
Khalilak, Zohreh
author_sort Akhlaghi, Nahid Mohammadzadeh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum residual root thickness (MRRT) of the danger zone after preflaring of the mesio-buccal (MB) canal of mandibular first molars using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden (GG) drills as coronal shapers by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, the initial CBCT scans of 75 MB canals of mandibular first molars were provided within 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm of the furcation level. The samples were divided into three groups. The samples of ProTaper and RaCe groups were prepared up to F2 and #25.04 as the master apical file (MAF), respectively. The coronal preparation of the samples in the GG group was done using GG drills #2, #3 and #4 and canals were prepared till MAF # 25. After obtaining the postinstrumentation images, the MRRT and the amount of removed dentin were analyzed by t-test and ANOVA statistical analyses. RESULTS: The GG drills removed significantly more dentin than RaCe at all the sections (P < 0.05) and more than ProTaper at 3 mm from the furcation. Statistically there was no significant difference between ProTaper and RaCe groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in MRRT between the groups (P > 0.05). The mean MRRT was not < 0.75 mm at all sections. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, when an appropriate root thickness is initially present, all of the instruments that were investigated may safely be used as coronal shapers in MB canals of mandibular first molars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4439851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44398512015-06-02 The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study Akhlaghi, Nahid Mohammadzadeh Bajgiran, Laleh Mohammadian Naghdi, Amirali Behrooz, Elaheh Khalilak, Zohreh Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the minimum residual root thickness (MRRT) of the danger zone after preflaring of the mesio-buccal (MB) canal of mandibular first molars using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden (GG) drills as coronal shapers by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, the initial CBCT scans of 75 MB canals of mandibular first molars were provided within 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm of the furcation level. The samples were divided into three groups. The samples of ProTaper and RaCe groups were prepared up to F2 and #25.04 as the master apical file (MAF), respectively. The coronal preparation of the samples in the GG group was done using GG drills #2, #3 and #4 and canals were prepared till MAF # 25. After obtaining the postinstrumentation images, the MRRT and the amount of removed dentin were analyzed by t-test and ANOVA statistical analyses. RESULTS: The GG drills removed significantly more dentin than RaCe at all the sections (P < 0.05) and more than ProTaper at 3 mm from the furcation. Statistically there was no significant difference between ProTaper and RaCe groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in MRRT between the groups (P > 0.05). The mean MRRT was not < 0.75 mm at all sections. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, when an appropriate root thickness is initially present, all of the instruments that were investigated may safely be used as coronal shapers in MB canals of mandibular first molars. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4439851/ /pubmed/26038655 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156833 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Akhlaghi, Nahid Mohammadzadeh
Bajgiran, Laleh Mohammadian
Naghdi, Amirali
Behrooz, Elaheh
Khalilak, Zohreh
The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study
title The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study
title_full The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study
title_fullStr The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study
title_full_unstemmed The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study
title_short The minimum residual root thickness after using ProTaper, RaCe and Gates-Glidden drills: A cone beam computerized tomography study
title_sort minimum residual root thickness after using protaper, race and gates-glidden drills: a cone beam computerized tomography study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038655
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156833
work_keys_str_mv AT akhlaghinahidmohammadzadeh theminimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy
AT bajgiranlalehmohammadian theminimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy
AT naghdiamirali theminimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy
AT behroozelaheh theminimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy
AT khalilakzohreh theminimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy
AT akhlaghinahidmohammadzadeh minimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy
AT bajgiranlalehmohammadian minimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy
AT naghdiamirali minimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy
AT behroozelaheh minimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy
AT khalilakzohreh minimumresidualrootthicknessafterusingprotaperraceandgatesgliddendrillsaconebeamcomputerizedtomographystudy