Cargando…

A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit fixed partial denture (FPD) having tooth as pier abutment using rigid and nonrigid connectors respectively, under simultaneous and progressive loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The three-dimensional (3D) fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Modi, Ritesh, Kohli, Shivani, Rajeshwari, K., Bhatia, Shekhar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038660
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156847
_version_ 1782372560398188544
author Modi, Ritesh
Kohli, Shivani
Rajeshwari, K.
Bhatia, Shekhar
author_facet Modi, Ritesh
Kohli, Shivani
Rajeshwari, K.
Bhatia, Shekhar
author_sort Modi, Ritesh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit fixed partial denture (FPD) having tooth as pier abutment using rigid and nonrigid connectors respectively, under simultaneous and progressive loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The three-dimensional (3D) finite element program (ANSYS software) was used to construct the mathematical model. Two 5-unit FPD’S were simulated, one with rigid connector and another one with nonrigid connector. For analysis, each of these models were subjected to axial and oblique forces under progressive loading (180, 180, 120, 120, 80 N force on first and second molars, premolars and canine respectively) and simultaneous loading (100, 100, 100, 100, 100 N force on first and second molars, premolars and canine respectively). RESULTS: The rigid and nonrigid connector design have effect on stress distribution in 5-unit FPDs with pier abutments. CONCLUSION: Oblique forces produce more stresses than vertical forces. Nonrigid connector resulted in decrease in stress at the level of prosthesis and increase in stress at the level of alveolar crest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4439856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44398562015-06-02 A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector Modi, Ritesh Kohli, Shivani Rajeshwari, K. Bhatia, Shekhar Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit fixed partial denture (FPD) having tooth as pier abutment using rigid and nonrigid connectors respectively, under simultaneous and progressive loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The three-dimensional (3D) finite element program (ANSYS software) was used to construct the mathematical model. Two 5-unit FPD’S were simulated, one with rigid connector and another one with nonrigid connector. For analysis, each of these models were subjected to axial and oblique forces under progressive loading (180, 180, 120, 120, 80 N force on first and second molars, premolars and canine respectively) and simultaneous loading (100, 100, 100, 100, 100 N force on first and second molars, premolars and canine respectively). RESULTS: The rigid and nonrigid connector design have effect on stress distribution in 5-unit FPDs with pier abutments. CONCLUSION: Oblique forces produce more stresses than vertical forces. Nonrigid connector resulted in decrease in stress at the level of prosthesis and increase in stress at the level of alveolar crest. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4439856/ /pubmed/26038660 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156847 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Modi, Ritesh
Kohli, Shivani
Rajeshwari, K.
Bhatia, Shekhar
A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector
title A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector
title_full A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector
title_fullStr A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector
title_full_unstemmed A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector
title_short A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector
title_sort three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038660
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156847
work_keys_str_mv AT modiritesh athreedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector
AT kohlishivani athreedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector
AT rajeshwarik athreedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector
AT bhatiashekhar athreedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector
AT modiritesh threedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector
AT kohlishivani threedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector
AT rajeshwarik threedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector
AT bhatiashekhar threedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector