Cargando…
A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit fixed partial denture (FPD) having tooth as pier abutment using rigid and nonrigid connectors respectively, under simultaneous and progressive loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The three-dimensional (3D) fi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038660 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156847 |
_version_ | 1782372560398188544 |
---|---|
author | Modi, Ritesh Kohli, Shivani Rajeshwari, K. Bhatia, Shekhar |
author_facet | Modi, Ritesh Kohli, Shivani Rajeshwari, K. Bhatia, Shekhar |
author_sort | Modi, Ritesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit fixed partial denture (FPD) having tooth as pier abutment using rigid and nonrigid connectors respectively, under simultaneous and progressive loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The three-dimensional (3D) finite element program (ANSYS software) was used to construct the mathematical model. Two 5-unit FPD’S were simulated, one with rigid connector and another one with nonrigid connector. For analysis, each of these models were subjected to axial and oblique forces under progressive loading (180, 180, 120, 120, 80 N force on first and second molars, premolars and canine respectively) and simultaneous loading (100, 100, 100, 100, 100 N force on first and second molars, premolars and canine respectively). RESULTS: The rigid and nonrigid connector design have effect on stress distribution in 5-unit FPDs with pier abutments. CONCLUSION: Oblique forces produce more stresses than vertical forces. Nonrigid connector resulted in decrease in stress at the level of prosthesis and increase in stress at the level of alveolar crest. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4439856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44398562015-06-02 A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector Modi, Ritesh Kohli, Shivani Rajeshwari, K. Bhatia, Shekhar Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit fixed partial denture (FPD) having tooth as pier abutment using rigid and nonrigid connectors respectively, under simultaneous and progressive loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The three-dimensional (3D) finite element program (ANSYS software) was used to construct the mathematical model. Two 5-unit FPD’S were simulated, one with rigid connector and another one with nonrigid connector. For analysis, each of these models were subjected to axial and oblique forces under progressive loading (180, 180, 120, 120, 80 N force on first and second molars, premolars and canine respectively) and simultaneous loading (100, 100, 100, 100, 100 N force on first and second molars, premolars and canine respectively). RESULTS: The rigid and nonrigid connector design have effect on stress distribution in 5-unit FPDs with pier abutments. CONCLUSION: Oblique forces produce more stresses than vertical forces. Nonrigid connector resulted in decrease in stress at the level of prosthesis and increase in stress at the level of alveolar crest. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4439856/ /pubmed/26038660 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156847 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Modi, Ritesh Kohli, Shivani Rajeshwari, K. Bhatia, Shekhar A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector |
title | A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector |
title_full | A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector |
title_fullStr | A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector |
title_full_unstemmed | A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector |
title_short | A three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector |
title_sort | three-dimension finite element analysis to evaluate the stress distribution in tooth supported 5-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis with rigid and nonrigid connector |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26038660 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.156847 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT modiritesh athreedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector AT kohlishivani athreedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector AT rajeshwarik athreedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector AT bhatiashekhar athreedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector AT modiritesh threedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector AT kohlishivani threedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector AT rajeshwarik threedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector AT bhatiashekhar threedimensionfiniteelementanalysistoevaluatethestressdistributionintoothsupported5unitintermediateabutmentprosthesiswithrigidandnonrigidconnector |