Cargando…

Simulation of the mechanical interlocking capacity of a rough bone implant surface during healing

BACKGROUND: When an implant is inserted in the bone the healing process starts to osseointegrate the implant by creating new bone that interlocks with the implant. Biomechanical interlocking capacity is commonly evaluated in in vivo experiments. It would be beneficial to find a numerical method to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halldin, Anders, Ander, Mats, Jacobsson, Magnus, Hansson, Stig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25994839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-015-0038-0
_version_ 1782372604956377088
author Halldin, Anders
Ander, Mats
Jacobsson, Magnus
Hansson, Stig
author_facet Halldin, Anders
Ander, Mats
Jacobsson, Magnus
Hansson, Stig
author_sort Halldin, Anders
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When an implant is inserted in the bone the healing process starts to osseointegrate the implant by creating new bone that interlocks with the implant. Biomechanical interlocking capacity is commonly evaluated in in vivo experiments. It would be beneficial to find a numerical method to evaluate the interlocking capacity of different surface structures with bone. In the present study, the theoretical interlocking capacity of three different surfaces after different healing times was evaluated by the means of explicit finite element analysis. METHODS: The surface topographies of the three surfaces were measured with interferometry and were used to construct a 3D bone-implant model. The implant was subjected to a displacement until failure of the bone-to-implant interface and the maximum force represents the interlocking capacity. RESULTS: The simulated ratios (test/control) seem to agree with the in vivo ratios of Halldin et al. for longer healing times. However the absolute removal torque values are underestimated and do not reach the biomechanical performance found in the study by Halldin et al. which might be a result of unknown mechanical properties of the interface. CONCLUSION: Finite element analysis is a promising method that might be used prior to an in vivo study to compare the load bearing capacity of the bone-to-implant interface of two surface topographies at longer healing times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4440247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44402472015-05-22 Simulation of the mechanical interlocking capacity of a rough bone implant surface during healing Halldin, Anders Ander, Mats Jacobsson, Magnus Hansson, Stig Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: When an implant is inserted in the bone the healing process starts to osseointegrate the implant by creating new bone that interlocks with the implant. Biomechanical interlocking capacity is commonly evaluated in in vivo experiments. It would be beneficial to find a numerical method to evaluate the interlocking capacity of different surface structures with bone. In the present study, the theoretical interlocking capacity of three different surfaces after different healing times was evaluated by the means of explicit finite element analysis. METHODS: The surface topographies of the three surfaces were measured with interferometry and were used to construct a 3D bone-implant model. The implant was subjected to a displacement until failure of the bone-to-implant interface and the maximum force represents the interlocking capacity. RESULTS: The simulated ratios (test/control) seem to agree with the in vivo ratios of Halldin et al. for longer healing times. However the absolute removal torque values are underestimated and do not reach the biomechanical performance found in the study by Halldin et al. which might be a result of unknown mechanical properties of the interface. CONCLUSION: Finite element analysis is a promising method that might be used prior to an in vivo study to compare the load bearing capacity of the bone-to-implant interface of two surface topographies at longer healing times. BioMed Central 2015-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4440247/ /pubmed/25994839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-015-0038-0 Text en © Halldin et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Halldin, Anders
Ander, Mats
Jacobsson, Magnus
Hansson, Stig
Simulation of the mechanical interlocking capacity of a rough bone implant surface during healing
title Simulation of the mechanical interlocking capacity of a rough bone implant surface during healing
title_full Simulation of the mechanical interlocking capacity of a rough bone implant surface during healing
title_fullStr Simulation of the mechanical interlocking capacity of a rough bone implant surface during healing
title_full_unstemmed Simulation of the mechanical interlocking capacity of a rough bone implant surface during healing
title_short Simulation of the mechanical interlocking capacity of a rough bone implant surface during healing
title_sort simulation of the mechanical interlocking capacity of a rough bone implant surface during healing
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25994839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-015-0038-0
work_keys_str_mv AT halldinanders simulationofthemechanicalinterlockingcapacityofaroughboneimplantsurfaceduringhealing
AT andermats simulationofthemechanicalinterlockingcapacityofaroughboneimplantsurfaceduringhealing
AT jacobssonmagnus simulationofthemechanicalinterlockingcapacityofaroughboneimplantsurfaceduringhealing
AT hanssonstig simulationofthemechanicalinterlockingcapacityofaroughboneimplantsurfaceduringhealing