Cargando…

Evaluation of 19-gauge endoscopic ultrasonography aspiration needles using various echoendoscopes

Background and study aims: 19-gauge (19G) needles are used for EUS-guided tissue acquisition and interventions. The aim of the current study was to compare the functional characteristics of 19G EUS needles by means of using various echoendoscopes in a bench simulator. Methods: The angles achieved fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Itoi, Takao, Itokawa, Fumihide, Sofuni, Atsushi, Kurihara, Toshio, Tsuchiya, Takayoshi, Ishii, Kentaro, Tsuji, Shujiro, Ikeuchi, Nobuhito, Kawakami, Hiroshi, Moriyasu, Fuminori, Yasuda, Ichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1359212
_version_ 1782372626370396160
author Itoi, Takao
Itokawa, Fumihide
Sofuni, Atsushi
Kurihara, Toshio
Tsuchiya, Takayoshi
Ishii, Kentaro
Tsuji, Shujiro
Ikeuchi, Nobuhito
Kawakami, Hiroshi
Moriyasu, Fuminori
Yasuda, Ichiro
author_facet Itoi, Takao
Itokawa, Fumihide
Sofuni, Atsushi
Kurihara, Toshio
Tsuchiya, Takayoshi
Ishii, Kentaro
Tsuji, Shujiro
Ikeuchi, Nobuhito
Kawakami, Hiroshi
Moriyasu, Fuminori
Yasuda, Ichiro
author_sort Itoi, Takao
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims: 19-gauge (19G) needles are used for EUS-guided tissue acquisition and interventions. The aim of the current study was to compare the functional characteristics of 19G EUS needles by means of using various echoendoscopes in a bench simulator. Methods: The angles achieved for 19G needles (EchoTip: ET-19G, EchoTip Flex: ExF-19G, Expect: Ex-19G, and ProCore: PC-19G) and for the distal tip of the echoendoscope were evaluated for maximal angulation settings of the distal tip and the elevator. Also the resistance to advancement of the 19G needles at these endoscope settings was assessed. All evaluations were done with endoscopes in a straight and in a curved position. Results: There was no large discrepancy for scope and needle angles among all echoendoscopes except for the slim Pentax scope (EG-3270UK). The ExF-19G and PC-19G needles showed better optimal angles in various conditions compared to standard 19G needles. In straight scope position, out of the 20 conditions (5 endoscopes × 2 positions of the distal tip × 2 elevator positions) the numbers of optimal angulations achieved for the Ex-19G, ExF-19G, ET-19G, and PC-19G, were 11 /20 (55 %), 20 /20 (100 %), 14 /20 (70 %) and 18 /20 (90 %), respectively. However, regarding resistance, it was impossible to advance theneedle with 14 /20 settings (70 %) for the Ex-19G, 3 /20 (15 %) for the ExF-19G, 10 /20 (50 %) for the ET-19G and 7 /20 (35 %) for the PC-19G. When the scopes were bent, with regard to the force needed to advance the needle, the numbers of optimal settings, for the Ex-19G, ExF-19G, ET-19G, and PC-19G, were 1 (5 %), 13 (65 %), 6 (30 %) and 8 (40 %), respectively. The mean maximum resistance to advancement was less for the ExF-19G than for the other needless in almost all scope and angle conditions (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Although there was no difference between needles, the resistance to passage was least with the flexible 19-gauge needle (ExF-19G).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4440372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44403722015-06-23 Evaluation of 19-gauge endoscopic ultrasonography aspiration needles using various echoendoscopes Itoi, Takao Itokawa, Fumihide Sofuni, Atsushi Kurihara, Toshio Tsuchiya, Takayoshi Ishii, Kentaro Tsuji, Shujiro Ikeuchi, Nobuhito Kawakami, Hiroshi Moriyasu, Fuminori Yasuda, Ichiro Endosc Int Open Article Background and study aims: 19-gauge (19G) needles are used for EUS-guided tissue acquisition and interventions. The aim of the current study was to compare the functional characteristics of 19G EUS needles by means of using various echoendoscopes in a bench simulator. Methods: The angles achieved for 19G needles (EchoTip: ET-19G, EchoTip Flex: ExF-19G, Expect: Ex-19G, and ProCore: PC-19G) and for the distal tip of the echoendoscope were evaluated for maximal angulation settings of the distal tip and the elevator. Also the resistance to advancement of the 19G needles at these endoscope settings was assessed. All evaluations were done with endoscopes in a straight and in a curved position. Results: There was no large discrepancy for scope and needle angles among all echoendoscopes except for the slim Pentax scope (EG-3270UK). The ExF-19G and PC-19G needles showed better optimal angles in various conditions compared to standard 19G needles. In straight scope position, out of the 20 conditions (5 endoscopes × 2 positions of the distal tip × 2 elevator positions) the numbers of optimal angulations achieved for the Ex-19G, ExF-19G, ET-19G, and PC-19G, were 11 /20 (55 %), 20 /20 (100 %), 14 /20 (70 %) and 18 /20 (90 %), respectively. However, regarding resistance, it was impossible to advance theneedle with 14 /20 settings (70 %) for the Ex-19G, 3 /20 (15 %) for the ExF-19G, 10 /20 (50 %) for the ET-19G and 7 /20 (35 %) for the PC-19G. When the scopes were bent, with regard to the force needed to advance the needle, the numbers of optimal settings, for the Ex-19G, ExF-19G, ET-19G, and PC-19G, were 1 (5 %), 13 (65 %), 6 (30 %) and 8 (40 %), respectively. The mean maximum resistance to advancement was less for the ExF-19G than for the other needless in almost all scope and angle conditions (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Although there was no difference between needles, the resistance to passage was least with the flexible 19-gauge needle (ExF-19G). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4440372/ /pubmed/26135509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1359212 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Itoi, Takao
Itokawa, Fumihide
Sofuni, Atsushi
Kurihara, Toshio
Tsuchiya, Takayoshi
Ishii, Kentaro
Tsuji, Shujiro
Ikeuchi, Nobuhito
Kawakami, Hiroshi
Moriyasu, Fuminori
Yasuda, Ichiro
Evaluation of 19-gauge endoscopic ultrasonography aspiration needles using various echoendoscopes
title Evaluation of 19-gauge endoscopic ultrasonography aspiration needles using various echoendoscopes
title_full Evaluation of 19-gauge endoscopic ultrasonography aspiration needles using various echoendoscopes
title_fullStr Evaluation of 19-gauge endoscopic ultrasonography aspiration needles using various echoendoscopes
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of 19-gauge endoscopic ultrasonography aspiration needles using various echoendoscopes
title_short Evaluation of 19-gauge endoscopic ultrasonography aspiration needles using various echoendoscopes
title_sort evaluation of 19-gauge endoscopic ultrasonography aspiration needles using various echoendoscopes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1359212
work_keys_str_mv AT itoitakao evaluationof19gaugeendoscopicultrasonographyaspirationneedlesusingvariousechoendoscopes
AT itokawafumihide evaluationof19gaugeendoscopicultrasonographyaspirationneedlesusingvariousechoendoscopes
AT sofuniatsushi evaluationof19gaugeendoscopicultrasonographyaspirationneedlesusingvariousechoendoscopes
AT kuriharatoshio evaluationof19gaugeendoscopicultrasonographyaspirationneedlesusingvariousechoendoscopes
AT tsuchiyatakayoshi evaluationof19gaugeendoscopicultrasonographyaspirationneedlesusingvariousechoendoscopes
AT ishiikentaro evaluationof19gaugeendoscopicultrasonographyaspirationneedlesusingvariousechoendoscopes
AT tsujishujiro evaluationof19gaugeendoscopicultrasonographyaspirationneedlesusingvariousechoendoscopes
AT ikeuchinobuhito evaluationof19gaugeendoscopicultrasonographyaspirationneedlesusingvariousechoendoscopes
AT kawakamihiroshi evaluationof19gaugeendoscopicultrasonographyaspirationneedlesusingvariousechoendoscopes
AT moriyasufuminori evaluationof19gaugeendoscopicultrasonographyaspirationneedlesusingvariousechoendoscopes
AT yasudaichiro evaluationof19gaugeendoscopicultrasonographyaspirationneedlesusingvariousechoendoscopes