Cargando…

Comparison of methods for the isolation of human breast epithelial and myoepithelial cells

Two lineages, epithelial, and myoepithelial cells are the main cell populations in the normal mammary gland and in breast cancer. Traditionally, cancer research has been performed using commercial cell lines, but primary cell cultures obtained from fresh breast tissue are a powerful tool to study mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zubeldia-Plazaola, Arantzazu, Ametller, Elisabet, Mancino, Mario, Prats de Puig, Miquel, López-Plana, Anna, Guzman, Flavia, Vinyals, Laia, Pastor-Arroyo, Eva M., Almendro, Vanessa, Fuster, Gemma, Gascón, Pedro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26052514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2015.00032
_version_ 1782372633452478464
author Zubeldia-Plazaola, Arantzazu
Ametller, Elisabet
Mancino, Mario
Prats de Puig, Miquel
López-Plana, Anna
Guzman, Flavia
Vinyals, Laia
Pastor-Arroyo, Eva M.
Almendro, Vanessa
Fuster, Gemma
Gascón, Pedro
author_facet Zubeldia-Plazaola, Arantzazu
Ametller, Elisabet
Mancino, Mario
Prats de Puig, Miquel
López-Plana, Anna
Guzman, Flavia
Vinyals, Laia
Pastor-Arroyo, Eva M.
Almendro, Vanessa
Fuster, Gemma
Gascón, Pedro
author_sort Zubeldia-Plazaola, Arantzazu
collection PubMed
description Two lineages, epithelial, and myoepithelial cells are the main cell populations in the normal mammary gland and in breast cancer. Traditionally, cancer research has been performed using commercial cell lines, but primary cell cultures obtained from fresh breast tissue are a powerful tool to study more reliably new aspects of mammary gland biology, including normal and pathological conditions. Nevertheless, the methods described to date have some technical problems in terms of cell viability and yield, which hamper work with primary mammary cells. Therefore, there is a need to optimize technology for the proper isolation of epithelial and myoepithelial cells. For this reason, we compared four methods in an effort to improve the isolation and primary cell culture of different cell populations of human mammary epithelium. The samples were obtained from healthy tissue of patients who had undergone mammoplasty or mastectomy surgery. We based our approaches on previously described methods, and incorporated additional steps to ameliorate technical efficiency and increase cell survival. We determined cell growth and viability by phase-contrast images, growth curve analysis and cell yield, and identified cell-lineage specific markers by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence in 3D cell cultures. These techniques allowed us to better evaluate the functional capabilities of these two main mammary lineages, using CD227/K19 (epithelial cells) and CD10/K14 (myoepithelial cells) antigens. Our results show that slow digestion at low enzymatic concentration combined with the differential centrifugation technique is the method that best fits the main goal of the present study: protocol efficiency and cell survival yield. In summary, we propose some guidelines to establish primary mammary epithelial cell lines more efficiently and to provide us with a strong research instrument to better understand the role of different epithelial cell types in the origin of breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4440402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44404022015-06-05 Comparison of methods for the isolation of human breast epithelial and myoepithelial cells Zubeldia-Plazaola, Arantzazu Ametller, Elisabet Mancino, Mario Prats de Puig, Miquel López-Plana, Anna Guzman, Flavia Vinyals, Laia Pastor-Arroyo, Eva M. Almendro, Vanessa Fuster, Gemma Gascón, Pedro Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology Two lineages, epithelial, and myoepithelial cells are the main cell populations in the normal mammary gland and in breast cancer. Traditionally, cancer research has been performed using commercial cell lines, but primary cell cultures obtained from fresh breast tissue are a powerful tool to study more reliably new aspects of mammary gland biology, including normal and pathological conditions. Nevertheless, the methods described to date have some technical problems in terms of cell viability and yield, which hamper work with primary mammary cells. Therefore, there is a need to optimize technology for the proper isolation of epithelial and myoepithelial cells. For this reason, we compared four methods in an effort to improve the isolation and primary cell culture of different cell populations of human mammary epithelium. The samples were obtained from healthy tissue of patients who had undergone mammoplasty or mastectomy surgery. We based our approaches on previously described methods, and incorporated additional steps to ameliorate technical efficiency and increase cell survival. We determined cell growth and viability by phase-contrast images, growth curve analysis and cell yield, and identified cell-lineage specific markers by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence in 3D cell cultures. These techniques allowed us to better evaluate the functional capabilities of these two main mammary lineages, using CD227/K19 (epithelial cells) and CD10/K14 (myoepithelial cells) antigens. Our results show that slow digestion at low enzymatic concentration combined with the differential centrifugation technique is the method that best fits the main goal of the present study: protocol efficiency and cell survival yield. In summary, we propose some guidelines to establish primary mammary epithelial cell lines more efficiently and to provide us with a strong research instrument to better understand the role of different epithelial cell types in the origin of breast cancer. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4440402/ /pubmed/26052514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2015.00032 Text en Copyright © 2015 Zubeldia-Plazaola, Ametller, Mancino, Prats de Puig, López-Plana, Guzman, Vinyals, Pastor-Arroyo, Almendro, Fuster and Gascón. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cell and Developmental Biology
Zubeldia-Plazaola, Arantzazu
Ametller, Elisabet
Mancino, Mario
Prats de Puig, Miquel
López-Plana, Anna
Guzman, Flavia
Vinyals, Laia
Pastor-Arroyo, Eva M.
Almendro, Vanessa
Fuster, Gemma
Gascón, Pedro
Comparison of methods for the isolation of human breast epithelial and myoepithelial cells
title Comparison of methods for the isolation of human breast epithelial and myoepithelial cells
title_full Comparison of methods for the isolation of human breast epithelial and myoepithelial cells
title_fullStr Comparison of methods for the isolation of human breast epithelial and myoepithelial cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods for the isolation of human breast epithelial and myoepithelial cells
title_short Comparison of methods for the isolation of human breast epithelial and myoepithelial cells
title_sort comparison of methods for the isolation of human breast epithelial and myoepithelial cells
topic Cell and Developmental Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26052514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2015.00032
work_keys_str_mv AT zubeldiaplazaolaarantzazu comparisonofmethodsfortheisolationofhumanbreastepithelialandmyoepithelialcells
AT ametllerelisabet comparisonofmethodsfortheisolationofhumanbreastepithelialandmyoepithelialcells
AT mancinomario comparisonofmethodsfortheisolationofhumanbreastepithelialandmyoepithelialcells
AT pratsdepuigmiquel comparisonofmethodsfortheisolationofhumanbreastepithelialandmyoepithelialcells
AT lopezplanaanna comparisonofmethodsfortheisolationofhumanbreastepithelialandmyoepithelialcells
AT guzmanflavia comparisonofmethodsfortheisolationofhumanbreastepithelialandmyoepithelialcells
AT vinyalslaia comparisonofmethodsfortheisolationofhumanbreastepithelialandmyoepithelialcells
AT pastorarroyoevam comparisonofmethodsfortheisolationofhumanbreastepithelialandmyoepithelialcells
AT almendrovanessa comparisonofmethodsfortheisolationofhumanbreastepithelialandmyoepithelialcells
AT fustergemma comparisonofmethodsfortheisolationofhumanbreastepithelialandmyoepithelialcells
AT gasconpedro comparisonofmethodsfortheisolationofhumanbreastepithelialandmyoepithelialcells