Cargando…

Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions

BACKGROUND: Patient survival and quality of life depend on each haemodialysis session being performed without fault. Monthly assessments of dialysis dose adequacy often fall short of this. This study reports the results of a feasibility study for the achievement of improved safety and quality in a h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcelli, Daniele, Matos, Antero, Sousa, Francisco, Peralta, Ricardo, Fazendeiro, João, Porra, Angel, Moscardo, Victor, Parisotto, Maria Teresa, Stopper, Andrea, Canaud, Bernard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26034586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfu145
_version_ 1782372643660365824
author Marcelli, Daniele
Matos, Antero
Sousa, Francisco
Peralta, Ricardo
Fazendeiro, João
Porra, Angel
Moscardo, Victor
Parisotto, Maria Teresa
Stopper, Andrea
Canaud, Bernard
author_facet Marcelli, Daniele
Matos, Antero
Sousa, Francisco
Peralta, Ricardo
Fazendeiro, João
Porra, Angel
Moscardo, Victor
Parisotto, Maria Teresa
Stopper, Andrea
Canaud, Bernard
author_sort Marcelli, Daniele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient survival and quality of life depend on each haemodialysis session being performed without fault. Monthly assessments of dialysis dose adequacy often fall short of this. This study reports the results of a feasibility study for the achievement of improved safety and quality in a haemodialysis session with the implementation of a 15-point checklist. METHODS: Fifteen quality indicators were compiled and tested in a Portuguese dialysis clinic from 1 February 2012 to 30 June 2013. The checklist was completed by the nursing staff and comprised three parts: Pre-session Safety Checks; Session Initiation Checks and Post-session Quality Checks. The maximum score that could be reached per session was 15. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients were distributed over 2–3 shifts. Of the 16 nurses employed, 4 were full time. The final average score was between 14 and 15. No nurse-specific and no shift-specific significant differences were detected. Four issues were identified that had a major effect on the results as a whole: delays in connection time; incompletely delivered treatment time; non-achievement of final body weight and failure to reach a Kt/V of at least 1.4. Improvements were most consistent in the Monday–Wednesday–Friday morning shifts compared with other shifts, and were temporarily compromised by the opening of a new shift. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of checklists for haemodialysis is feasible in routine clinical practice, even in clinics where only part of the staff is employed full time. The application of such checklists enhances the overall quality and safety of the delivered treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4440460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44404602015-06-01 Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions Marcelli, Daniele Matos, Antero Sousa, Francisco Peralta, Ricardo Fazendeiro, João Porra, Angel Moscardo, Victor Parisotto, Maria Teresa Stopper, Andrea Canaud, Bernard Clin Kidney J Contents BACKGROUND: Patient survival and quality of life depend on each haemodialysis session being performed without fault. Monthly assessments of dialysis dose adequacy often fall short of this. This study reports the results of a feasibility study for the achievement of improved safety and quality in a haemodialysis session with the implementation of a 15-point checklist. METHODS: Fifteen quality indicators were compiled and tested in a Portuguese dialysis clinic from 1 February 2012 to 30 June 2013. The checklist was completed by the nursing staff and comprised three parts: Pre-session Safety Checks; Session Initiation Checks and Post-session Quality Checks. The maximum score that could be reached per session was 15. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients were distributed over 2–3 shifts. Of the 16 nurses employed, 4 were full time. The final average score was between 14 and 15. No nurse-specific and no shift-specific significant differences were detected. Four issues were identified that had a major effect on the results as a whole: delays in connection time; incompletely delivered treatment time; non-achievement of final body weight and failure to reach a Kt/V of at least 1.4. Improvements were most consistent in the Monday–Wednesday–Friday morning shifts compared with other shifts, and were temporarily compromised by the opening of a new shift. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of checklists for haemodialysis is feasible in routine clinical practice, even in clinics where only part of the staff is employed full time. The application of such checklists enhances the overall quality and safety of the delivered treatment. Oxford University Press 2015-06 2015-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4440460/ /pubmed/26034586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfu145 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Contents
Marcelli, Daniele
Matos, Antero
Sousa, Francisco
Peralta, Ricardo
Fazendeiro, João
Porra, Angel
Moscardo, Victor
Parisotto, Maria Teresa
Stopper, Andrea
Canaud, Bernard
Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions
title Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions
title_full Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions
title_fullStr Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions
title_short Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions
title_sort implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions
topic Contents
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26034586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfu145
work_keys_str_mv AT marcellidaniele implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions
AT matosantero implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions
AT sousafrancisco implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions
AT peraltaricardo implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions
AT fazendeirojoao implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions
AT porraangel implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions
AT moscardovictor implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions
AT parisottomariateresa implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions
AT stopperandrea implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions
AT canaudbernard implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions