Cargando…
Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions
BACKGROUND: Patient survival and quality of life depend on each haemodialysis session being performed without fault. Monthly assessments of dialysis dose adequacy often fall short of this. This study reports the results of a feasibility study for the achievement of improved safety and quality in a h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26034586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfu145 |
_version_ | 1782372643660365824 |
---|---|
author | Marcelli, Daniele Matos, Antero Sousa, Francisco Peralta, Ricardo Fazendeiro, João Porra, Angel Moscardo, Victor Parisotto, Maria Teresa Stopper, Andrea Canaud, Bernard |
author_facet | Marcelli, Daniele Matos, Antero Sousa, Francisco Peralta, Ricardo Fazendeiro, João Porra, Angel Moscardo, Victor Parisotto, Maria Teresa Stopper, Andrea Canaud, Bernard |
author_sort | Marcelli, Daniele |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient survival and quality of life depend on each haemodialysis session being performed without fault. Monthly assessments of dialysis dose adequacy often fall short of this. This study reports the results of a feasibility study for the achievement of improved safety and quality in a haemodialysis session with the implementation of a 15-point checklist. METHODS: Fifteen quality indicators were compiled and tested in a Portuguese dialysis clinic from 1 February 2012 to 30 June 2013. The checklist was completed by the nursing staff and comprised three parts: Pre-session Safety Checks; Session Initiation Checks and Post-session Quality Checks. The maximum score that could be reached per session was 15. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients were distributed over 2–3 shifts. Of the 16 nurses employed, 4 were full time. The final average score was between 14 and 15. No nurse-specific and no shift-specific significant differences were detected. Four issues were identified that had a major effect on the results as a whole: delays in connection time; incompletely delivered treatment time; non-achievement of final body weight and failure to reach a Kt/V of at least 1.4. Improvements were most consistent in the Monday–Wednesday–Friday morning shifts compared with other shifts, and were temporarily compromised by the opening of a new shift. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of checklists for haemodialysis is feasible in routine clinical practice, even in clinics where only part of the staff is employed full time. The application of such checklists enhances the overall quality and safety of the delivered treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4440460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44404602015-06-01 Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions Marcelli, Daniele Matos, Antero Sousa, Francisco Peralta, Ricardo Fazendeiro, João Porra, Angel Moscardo, Victor Parisotto, Maria Teresa Stopper, Andrea Canaud, Bernard Clin Kidney J Contents BACKGROUND: Patient survival and quality of life depend on each haemodialysis session being performed without fault. Monthly assessments of dialysis dose adequacy often fall short of this. This study reports the results of a feasibility study for the achievement of improved safety and quality in a haemodialysis session with the implementation of a 15-point checklist. METHODS: Fifteen quality indicators were compiled and tested in a Portuguese dialysis clinic from 1 February 2012 to 30 June 2013. The checklist was completed by the nursing staff and comprised three parts: Pre-session Safety Checks; Session Initiation Checks and Post-session Quality Checks. The maximum score that could be reached per session was 15. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients were distributed over 2–3 shifts. Of the 16 nurses employed, 4 were full time. The final average score was between 14 and 15. No nurse-specific and no shift-specific significant differences were detected. Four issues were identified that had a major effect on the results as a whole: delays in connection time; incompletely delivered treatment time; non-achievement of final body weight and failure to reach a Kt/V of at least 1.4. Improvements were most consistent in the Monday–Wednesday–Friday morning shifts compared with other shifts, and were temporarily compromised by the opening of a new shift. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of checklists for haemodialysis is feasible in routine clinical practice, even in clinics where only part of the staff is employed full time. The application of such checklists enhances the overall quality and safety of the delivered treatment. Oxford University Press 2015-06 2015-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4440460/ /pubmed/26034586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfu145 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Contents Marcelli, Daniele Matos, Antero Sousa, Francisco Peralta, Ricardo Fazendeiro, João Porra, Angel Moscardo, Victor Parisotto, Maria Teresa Stopper, Andrea Canaud, Bernard Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions |
title | Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions |
title_full | Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions |
title_fullStr | Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions |
title_short | Implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions |
title_sort | implementation of a quality and safety checklist for haemodialysis sessions |
topic | Contents |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26034586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfu145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marcellidaniele implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions AT matosantero implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions AT sousafrancisco implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions AT peraltaricardo implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions AT fazendeirojoao implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions AT porraangel implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions AT moscardovictor implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions AT parisottomariateresa implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions AT stopperandrea implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions AT canaudbernard implementationofaqualityandsafetychecklistforhaemodialysissessions |