Cargando…
Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals?
BACKGROUND: Selective outcome reporting of either interesting or positive research findings is problematic, running the risk of poorly-informed treatment decisions. We aimed to assess the extent of outcome and other discrepancies and possible selective reporting between registry entries and publishe...
Autores principales: | Fleming, Padhraig S., Koletsi, Despina, Dwan, Kerry, Pandis, Nikolaos |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25996928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127495 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Discrepancies in Outcome Reporting Exist Between Protocols and Published Oral Health Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Pandis, Nikolaos, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Are Sample Sizes Clear and Justified in RCTs Published in Dental Journals?
por: Koletsi, Despina, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Blinded by PRISMA: Are Systematic Reviewers Focusing on PRISMA and Ignoring Other Guidelines?
por: Fleming, Padhraig S., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols
por: Pandis, Nikolaos, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Clinical evaluation of marketed orthodontic products: are researchers behind the times? A meta-epidemiological study
por: Seehra, Jadbinder, et al.
Publicado: (2017)