Cargando…
Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression
Previous studies using binocular rivalry have shown that signals in a modality other than the visual can bias dominance durations depending on their congruency with the rivaling stimuli. More recently, studies using continuous flash suppression (CFS) have reported that multisensory integration influ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pion
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4441023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26034573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0678 |
_version_ | 1782372729074221056 |
---|---|
author | Moors, Pieter Huygelier, Hanne Wagemans, Johan de-Wit, Lee van Ee, Raymond |
author_facet | Moors, Pieter Huygelier, Hanne Wagemans, Johan de-Wit, Lee van Ee, Raymond |
author_sort | Moors, Pieter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous studies using binocular rivalry have shown that signals in a modality other than the visual can bias dominance durations depending on their congruency with the rivaling stimuli. More recently, studies using continuous flash suppression (CFS) have reported that multisensory integration influences how long visual stimuli remain suppressed. In this study, using CFS, we examined whether the contrast thresholds for detecting visual looming stimuli are influenced by a congruent auditory stimulus. In Experiment 1, we show that a looming visual stimulus can result in lower detection thresholds compared to a static concentric grating, but that auditory tone pips congruent with the looming stimulus did not lower suppression thresholds any further. In Experiments 2, 3, and 4, we again observed no advantage for congruent multisensory stimuli. These results add to our understanding of the conditions under which multisensory integration is possible, and suggest that certain forms of multisensory integration are not evident when the visual stimulus is suppressed from awareness using CFS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4441023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Pion |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44410232015-06-01 Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression Moors, Pieter Huygelier, Hanne Wagemans, Johan de-Wit, Lee van Ee, Raymond Iperception Article Previous studies using binocular rivalry have shown that signals in a modality other than the visual can bias dominance durations depending on their congruency with the rivaling stimuli. More recently, studies using continuous flash suppression (CFS) have reported that multisensory integration influences how long visual stimuli remain suppressed. In this study, using CFS, we examined whether the contrast thresholds for detecting visual looming stimuli are influenced by a congruent auditory stimulus. In Experiment 1, we show that a looming visual stimulus can result in lower detection thresholds compared to a static concentric grating, but that auditory tone pips congruent with the looming stimulus did not lower suppression thresholds any further. In Experiments 2, 3, and 4, we again observed no advantage for congruent multisensory stimuli. These results add to our understanding of the conditions under which multisensory integration is possible, and suggest that certain forms of multisensory integration are not evident when the visual stimulus is suppressed from awareness using CFS. Pion 2015-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4441023/ /pubmed/26034573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0678 Text en Copyright 2015 P Moors, H Huygelier, J Wagemans, L de-Wit, R van Ee http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Copyright is retained by the author(s) of this article. This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Licence, which permits commercial use, distribution, adaption, and reproduction, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Moors, Pieter Huygelier, Hanne Wagemans, Johan de-Wit, Lee van Ee, Raymond Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression |
title | Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression |
title_full | Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression |
title_fullStr | Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression |
title_full_unstemmed | Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression |
title_short | Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression |
title_sort | suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: evidence from continuous flash suppression |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4441023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26034573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0678 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moorspieter suppressedvisualloomingstimuliarenotintegratedwithauditoryloomingsignalsevidencefromcontinuousflashsuppression AT huygelierhanne suppressedvisualloomingstimuliarenotintegratedwithauditoryloomingsignalsevidencefromcontinuousflashsuppression AT wagemansjohan suppressedvisualloomingstimuliarenotintegratedwithauditoryloomingsignalsevidencefromcontinuousflashsuppression AT dewitlee suppressedvisualloomingstimuliarenotintegratedwithauditoryloomingsignalsevidencefromcontinuousflashsuppression AT vaneeraymond suppressedvisualloomingstimuliarenotintegratedwithauditoryloomingsignalsevidencefromcontinuousflashsuppression |