Cargando…

Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression

Previous studies using binocular rivalry have shown that signals in a modality other than the visual can bias dominance durations depending on their congruency with the rivaling stimuli. More recently, studies using continuous flash suppression (CFS) have reported that multisensory integration influ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moors, Pieter, Huygelier, Hanne, Wagemans, Johan, de-Wit, Lee, van Ee, Raymond
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pion 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4441023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26034573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0678
_version_ 1782372729074221056
author Moors, Pieter
Huygelier, Hanne
Wagemans, Johan
de-Wit, Lee
van Ee, Raymond
author_facet Moors, Pieter
Huygelier, Hanne
Wagemans, Johan
de-Wit, Lee
van Ee, Raymond
author_sort Moors, Pieter
collection PubMed
description Previous studies using binocular rivalry have shown that signals in a modality other than the visual can bias dominance durations depending on their congruency with the rivaling stimuli. More recently, studies using continuous flash suppression (CFS) have reported that multisensory integration influences how long visual stimuli remain suppressed. In this study, using CFS, we examined whether the contrast thresholds for detecting visual looming stimuli are influenced by a congruent auditory stimulus. In Experiment 1, we show that a looming visual stimulus can result in lower detection thresholds compared to a static concentric grating, but that auditory tone pips congruent with the looming stimulus did not lower suppression thresholds any further. In Experiments 2, 3, and 4, we again observed no advantage for congruent multisensory stimuli. These results add to our understanding of the conditions under which multisensory integration is possible, and suggest that certain forms of multisensory integration are not evident when the visual stimulus is suppressed from awareness using CFS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4441023
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Pion
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44410232015-06-01 Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression Moors, Pieter Huygelier, Hanne Wagemans, Johan de-Wit, Lee van Ee, Raymond Iperception Article Previous studies using binocular rivalry have shown that signals in a modality other than the visual can bias dominance durations depending on their congruency with the rivaling stimuli. More recently, studies using continuous flash suppression (CFS) have reported that multisensory integration influences how long visual stimuli remain suppressed. In this study, using CFS, we examined whether the contrast thresholds for detecting visual looming stimuli are influenced by a congruent auditory stimulus. In Experiment 1, we show that a looming visual stimulus can result in lower detection thresholds compared to a static concentric grating, but that auditory tone pips congruent with the looming stimulus did not lower suppression thresholds any further. In Experiments 2, 3, and 4, we again observed no advantage for congruent multisensory stimuli. These results add to our understanding of the conditions under which multisensory integration is possible, and suggest that certain forms of multisensory integration are not evident when the visual stimulus is suppressed from awareness using CFS. Pion 2015-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4441023/ /pubmed/26034573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0678 Text en Copyright 2015 P Moors, H Huygelier, J Wagemans, L de-Wit, R van Ee http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Copyright is retained by the author(s) of this article. This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Licence, which permits commercial use, distribution, adaption, and reproduction, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Moors, Pieter
Huygelier, Hanne
Wagemans, Johan
de-Wit, Lee
van Ee, Raymond
Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression
title Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression
title_full Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression
title_fullStr Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression
title_full_unstemmed Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression
title_short Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression
title_sort suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: evidence from continuous flash suppression
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4441023/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26034573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0678
work_keys_str_mv AT moorspieter suppressedvisualloomingstimuliarenotintegratedwithauditoryloomingsignalsevidencefromcontinuousflashsuppression
AT huygelierhanne suppressedvisualloomingstimuliarenotintegratedwithauditoryloomingsignalsevidencefromcontinuousflashsuppression
AT wagemansjohan suppressedvisualloomingstimuliarenotintegratedwithauditoryloomingsignalsevidencefromcontinuousflashsuppression
AT dewitlee suppressedvisualloomingstimuliarenotintegratedwithauditoryloomingsignalsevidencefromcontinuousflashsuppression
AT vaneeraymond suppressedvisualloomingstimuliarenotintegratedwithauditoryloomingsignalsevidencefromcontinuousflashsuppression