Cargando…

The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment

Therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has been linked to a subpopulation of cells with stem cell-like properties, the glioma stem cells (GSCs), responsible for cancer progression and recurrence. This study investigated the in vitro cytotoxicity of three chemotherapeutics, temozolom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ANNOVAZZI, LAURA, CALDERA, VALENTINA, MELLAI, MARTA, RIGANTI, CHIARA, BATTAGLIA, LUIGI, CHIRIO, DANIELA, MELCARNE, ANTONIO, SCHIFFER, DAVIDE
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4441296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25892134
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.2963
_version_ 1782372772136091648
author ANNOVAZZI, LAURA
CALDERA, VALENTINA
MELLAI, MARTA
RIGANTI, CHIARA
BATTAGLIA, LUIGI
CHIRIO, DANIELA
MELCARNE, ANTONIO
SCHIFFER, DAVIDE
author_facet ANNOVAZZI, LAURA
CALDERA, VALENTINA
MELLAI, MARTA
RIGANTI, CHIARA
BATTAGLIA, LUIGI
CHIRIO, DANIELA
MELCARNE, ANTONIO
SCHIFFER, DAVIDE
author_sort ANNOVAZZI, LAURA
collection PubMed
description Therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has been linked to a subpopulation of cells with stem cell-like properties, the glioma stem cells (GSCs), responsible for cancer progression and recurrence. This study investigated the in vitro cytotoxicity of three chemotherapeutics, temozolomide (TMZ), doxorubicin (Dox) and paclitaxel (PTX) on glioma cell lines, by analyzing the molecular mechanisms leading to DNA repair and cell resistance, or to cell death. The drugs were tested on 16 GBM cell lines, grown as neurospheres (NS) or adherent cells (AC), by studying DNA damage occurrence by Comet assay, the expression by immunofluorescence and western blotting of checkpoint/repair molecules and apoptosis. The three drugs were able to provoke a genotoxic injury and to inhibit dose- and time-dependently cell proliferation, more evidently in AC than in NS. The first cell response to DNA damage was the activation of the damage sensors (p-ATM, p-53BP1, γ-H2AX), followed by repair effectors; the expression of checkpoint/repair molecules appeared higher in NS than in AC. The non-homologous repair pathway (NHEJ) seemed more involved than the homologous one (HR). Apoptosis occurred after long treatment times, but only a small percentage of cells in NS underwent death, even at high drug concentration, whereas most cells survived in a quiescent state and resumed proliferation after drug removal. In tumor specimens, checkpoint/repair proteins were constitutively expressed in GBMs, but not in low-grade gliomas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4441296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44412962015-05-29 The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment ANNOVAZZI, LAURA CALDERA, VALENTINA MELLAI, MARTA RIGANTI, CHIARA BATTAGLIA, LUIGI CHIRIO, DANIELA MELCARNE, ANTONIO SCHIFFER, DAVIDE Int J Oncol Articles Therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has been linked to a subpopulation of cells with stem cell-like properties, the glioma stem cells (GSCs), responsible for cancer progression and recurrence. This study investigated the in vitro cytotoxicity of three chemotherapeutics, temozolomide (TMZ), doxorubicin (Dox) and paclitaxel (PTX) on glioma cell lines, by analyzing the molecular mechanisms leading to DNA repair and cell resistance, or to cell death. The drugs were tested on 16 GBM cell lines, grown as neurospheres (NS) or adherent cells (AC), by studying DNA damage occurrence by Comet assay, the expression by immunofluorescence and western blotting of checkpoint/repair molecules and apoptosis. The three drugs were able to provoke a genotoxic injury and to inhibit dose- and time-dependently cell proliferation, more evidently in AC than in NS. The first cell response to DNA damage was the activation of the damage sensors (p-ATM, p-53BP1, γ-H2AX), followed by repair effectors; the expression of checkpoint/repair molecules appeared higher in NS than in AC. The non-homologous repair pathway (NHEJ) seemed more involved than the homologous one (HR). Apoptosis occurred after long treatment times, but only a small percentage of cells in NS underwent death, even at high drug concentration, whereas most cells survived in a quiescent state and resumed proliferation after drug removal. In tumor specimens, checkpoint/repair proteins were constitutively expressed in GBMs, but not in low-grade gliomas. D.A. Spandidos 2015-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4441296/ /pubmed/25892134 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.2963 Text en Copyright © 2015, Spandidos Publications http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
ANNOVAZZI, LAURA
CALDERA, VALENTINA
MELLAI, MARTA
RIGANTI, CHIARA
BATTAGLIA, LUIGI
CHIRIO, DANIELA
MELCARNE, ANTONIO
SCHIFFER, DAVIDE
The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment
title The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment
title_full The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment
title_fullStr The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment
title_full_unstemmed The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment
title_short The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment
title_sort dna damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4441296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25892134
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.2963
work_keys_str_mv AT annovazzilaura thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT calderavalentina thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT mellaimarta thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT rigantichiara thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT battaglialuigi thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT chiriodaniela thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT melcarneantonio thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT schifferdavide thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT annovazzilaura dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT calderavalentina dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT mellaimarta dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT rigantichiara dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT battaglialuigi dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT chiriodaniela dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT melcarneantonio dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment
AT schifferdavide dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment