Cargando…
The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment
Therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has been linked to a subpopulation of cells with stem cell-like properties, the glioma stem cells (GSCs), responsible for cancer progression and recurrence. This study investigated the in vitro cytotoxicity of three chemotherapeutics, temozolom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
D.A. Spandidos
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4441296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25892134 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.2963 |
_version_ | 1782372772136091648 |
---|---|
author | ANNOVAZZI, LAURA CALDERA, VALENTINA MELLAI, MARTA RIGANTI, CHIARA BATTAGLIA, LUIGI CHIRIO, DANIELA MELCARNE, ANTONIO SCHIFFER, DAVIDE |
author_facet | ANNOVAZZI, LAURA CALDERA, VALENTINA MELLAI, MARTA RIGANTI, CHIARA BATTAGLIA, LUIGI CHIRIO, DANIELA MELCARNE, ANTONIO SCHIFFER, DAVIDE |
author_sort | ANNOVAZZI, LAURA |
collection | PubMed |
description | Therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has been linked to a subpopulation of cells with stem cell-like properties, the glioma stem cells (GSCs), responsible for cancer progression and recurrence. This study investigated the in vitro cytotoxicity of three chemotherapeutics, temozolomide (TMZ), doxorubicin (Dox) and paclitaxel (PTX) on glioma cell lines, by analyzing the molecular mechanisms leading to DNA repair and cell resistance, or to cell death. The drugs were tested on 16 GBM cell lines, grown as neurospheres (NS) or adherent cells (AC), by studying DNA damage occurrence by Comet assay, the expression by immunofluorescence and western blotting of checkpoint/repair molecules and apoptosis. The three drugs were able to provoke a genotoxic injury and to inhibit dose- and time-dependently cell proliferation, more evidently in AC than in NS. The first cell response to DNA damage was the activation of the damage sensors (p-ATM, p-53BP1, γ-H2AX), followed by repair effectors; the expression of checkpoint/repair molecules appeared higher in NS than in AC. The non-homologous repair pathway (NHEJ) seemed more involved than the homologous one (HR). Apoptosis occurred after long treatment times, but only a small percentage of cells in NS underwent death, even at high drug concentration, whereas most cells survived in a quiescent state and resumed proliferation after drug removal. In tumor specimens, checkpoint/repair proteins were constitutively expressed in GBMs, but not in low-grade gliomas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4441296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | D.A. Spandidos |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44412962015-05-29 The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment ANNOVAZZI, LAURA CALDERA, VALENTINA MELLAI, MARTA RIGANTI, CHIARA BATTAGLIA, LUIGI CHIRIO, DANIELA MELCARNE, ANTONIO SCHIFFER, DAVIDE Int J Oncol Articles Therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has been linked to a subpopulation of cells with stem cell-like properties, the glioma stem cells (GSCs), responsible for cancer progression and recurrence. This study investigated the in vitro cytotoxicity of three chemotherapeutics, temozolomide (TMZ), doxorubicin (Dox) and paclitaxel (PTX) on glioma cell lines, by analyzing the molecular mechanisms leading to DNA repair and cell resistance, or to cell death. The drugs were tested on 16 GBM cell lines, grown as neurospheres (NS) or adherent cells (AC), by studying DNA damage occurrence by Comet assay, the expression by immunofluorescence and western blotting of checkpoint/repair molecules and apoptosis. The three drugs were able to provoke a genotoxic injury and to inhibit dose- and time-dependently cell proliferation, more evidently in AC than in NS. The first cell response to DNA damage was the activation of the damage sensors (p-ATM, p-53BP1, γ-H2AX), followed by repair effectors; the expression of checkpoint/repair molecules appeared higher in NS than in AC. The non-homologous repair pathway (NHEJ) seemed more involved than the homologous one (HR). Apoptosis occurred after long treatment times, but only a small percentage of cells in NS underwent death, even at high drug concentration, whereas most cells survived in a quiescent state and resumed proliferation after drug removal. In tumor specimens, checkpoint/repair proteins were constitutively expressed in GBMs, but not in low-grade gliomas. D.A. Spandidos 2015-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4441296/ /pubmed/25892134 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.2963 Text en Copyright © 2015, Spandidos Publications http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles ANNOVAZZI, LAURA CALDERA, VALENTINA MELLAI, MARTA RIGANTI, CHIARA BATTAGLIA, LUIGI CHIRIO, DANIELA MELCARNE, ANTONIO SCHIFFER, DAVIDE The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment |
title | The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment |
title_full | The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment |
title_fullStr | The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment |
title_short | The DNA damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment |
title_sort | dna damage/repair cascade in glioblastoma cell lines after chemotherapeutic agent treatment |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4441296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25892134 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.2963 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT annovazzilaura thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT calderavalentina thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT mellaimarta thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT rigantichiara thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT battaglialuigi thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT chiriodaniela thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT melcarneantonio thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT schifferdavide thednadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT annovazzilaura dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT calderavalentina dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT mellaimarta dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT rigantichiara dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT battaglialuigi dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT chiriodaniela dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT melcarneantonio dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment AT schifferdavide dnadamagerepaircascadeinglioblastomacelllinesafterchemotherapeuticagenttreatment |