Cargando…

Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of storage mites in the development of allergic diseases among ham production workers, and to search for early alterations in lung function tests and early inflammation markers in exhaled air. Respiratory allergies due to storage mites have been reported in people...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tafuro, Federica, Ridolo, Erminia, Goldoni, Matteo, Montagni, Marcello, Mutti, Antonio, Corradi, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25991455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007502
_version_ 1782372863599181824
author Tafuro, Federica
Ridolo, Erminia
Goldoni, Matteo
Montagni, Marcello
Mutti, Antonio
Corradi, Massimo
author_facet Tafuro, Federica
Ridolo, Erminia
Goldoni, Matteo
Montagni, Marcello
Mutti, Antonio
Corradi, Massimo
author_sort Tafuro, Federica
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of storage mites in the development of allergic diseases among ham production workers, and to search for early alterations in lung function tests and early inflammation markers in exhaled air. Respiratory allergies due to storage mites have been reported in people with various occupations but, although such mites are unavoidable when curing ham, there are no published data concerning ham production workers. SETTING: Secondary care. DESIGN: Experimental cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: 220 participants (110 ham production workers and 110 controls) were recruited. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Workers answered a medical questionnaire, and underwent spirometry and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide at 50 mL/s (FeNO(50)) measurements. Those with allergic symptoms also underwent skin prick tests to determine their sensitisation to airborne allergens. A methacholine test was performed in symptomatic participants when spirometry was normal to assess airways hyper-responsiveness. RESULTS: Symptomatic storage mite sensitisation was observed in 16 workers (14.5%) (rhinoconjunctivitis in 15 (63%) and asthma in (4%)) and 2 controls (1.8%; p=0.001). Higher FeNO(50) values in exposed symptomatic workers compared with healthy control participants (34.65±7.49 vs 13.29±4.29 ppb; p<0.001) suggested bronchial and nasal involvement, although their lung function parameters were normal. Regardless of exposure, a FeNO(50) value of 22.5 ppb seems to be 100% sensitive and 99.4% specific in distinguishing allergic and non-allergic participants. Multivariate analysis of FeNO(50) values in the symptomatic participants showed that they were positively influenced by IgE-mediated allergy (p=0.001) and reported symptom severity (p=0.041), and negatively by smoking status (p=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Ham processing workers, as well as workers involved in any meat processing work that includes curing, should be informed about the occupational risk of sensitisation to mites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4442148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44421482015-05-28 Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers Tafuro, Federica Ridolo, Erminia Goldoni, Matteo Montagni, Marcello Mutti, Antonio Corradi, Massimo BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of storage mites in the development of allergic diseases among ham production workers, and to search for early alterations in lung function tests and early inflammation markers in exhaled air. Respiratory allergies due to storage mites have been reported in people with various occupations but, although such mites are unavoidable when curing ham, there are no published data concerning ham production workers. SETTING: Secondary care. DESIGN: Experimental cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: 220 participants (110 ham production workers and 110 controls) were recruited. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Workers answered a medical questionnaire, and underwent spirometry and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide at 50 mL/s (FeNO(50)) measurements. Those with allergic symptoms also underwent skin prick tests to determine their sensitisation to airborne allergens. A methacholine test was performed in symptomatic participants when spirometry was normal to assess airways hyper-responsiveness. RESULTS: Symptomatic storage mite sensitisation was observed in 16 workers (14.5%) (rhinoconjunctivitis in 15 (63%) and asthma in (4%)) and 2 controls (1.8%; p=0.001). Higher FeNO(50) values in exposed symptomatic workers compared with healthy control participants (34.65±7.49 vs 13.29±4.29 ppb; p<0.001) suggested bronchial and nasal involvement, although their lung function parameters were normal. Regardless of exposure, a FeNO(50) value of 22.5 ppb seems to be 100% sensitive and 99.4% specific in distinguishing allergic and non-allergic participants. Multivariate analysis of FeNO(50) values in the symptomatic participants showed that they were positively influenced by IgE-mediated allergy (p=0.001) and reported symptom severity (p=0.041), and negatively by smoking status (p=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Ham processing workers, as well as workers involved in any meat processing work that includes curing, should be informed about the occupational risk of sensitisation to mites. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4442148/ /pubmed/25991455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007502 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Tafuro, Federica
Ridolo, Erminia
Goldoni, Matteo
Montagni, Marcello
Mutti, Antonio
Corradi, Massimo
Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers
title Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers
title_full Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers
title_fullStr Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers
title_full_unstemmed Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers
title_short Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers
title_sort work-related allergies to storage mites in parma (italy) ham workers
topic Occupational and Environmental Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25991455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007502
work_keys_str_mv AT tafurofederica workrelatedallergiestostoragemitesinparmaitalyhamworkers
AT ridoloerminia workrelatedallergiestostoragemitesinparmaitalyhamworkers
AT goldonimatteo workrelatedallergiestostoragemitesinparmaitalyhamworkers
AT montagnimarcello workrelatedallergiestostoragemitesinparmaitalyhamworkers
AT muttiantonio workrelatedallergiestostoragemitesinparmaitalyhamworkers
AT corradimassimo workrelatedallergiestostoragemitesinparmaitalyhamworkers