Cargando…
Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of storage mites in the development of allergic diseases among ham production workers, and to search for early alterations in lung function tests and early inflammation markers in exhaled air. Respiratory allergies due to storage mites have been reported in people...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25991455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007502 |
_version_ | 1782372863599181824 |
---|---|
author | Tafuro, Federica Ridolo, Erminia Goldoni, Matteo Montagni, Marcello Mutti, Antonio Corradi, Massimo |
author_facet | Tafuro, Federica Ridolo, Erminia Goldoni, Matteo Montagni, Marcello Mutti, Antonio Corradi, Massimo |
author_sort | Tafuro, Federica |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of storage mites in the development of allergic diseases among ham production workers, and to search for early alterations in lung function tests and early inflammation markers in exhaled air. Respiratory allergies due to storage mites have been reported in people with various occupations but, although such mites are unavoidable when curing ham, there are no published data concerning ham production workers. SETTING: Secondary care. DESIGN: Experimental cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: 220 participants (110 ham production workers and 110 controls) were recruited. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Workers answered a medical questionnaire, and underwent spirometry and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide at 50 mL/s (FeNO(50)) measurements. Those with allergic symptoms also underwent skin prick tests to determine their sensitisation to airborne allergens. A methacholine test was performed in symptomatic participants when spirometry was normal to assess airways hyper-responsiveness. RESULTS: Symptomatic storage mite sensitisation was observed in 16 workers (14.5%) (rhinoconjunctivitis in 15 (63%) and asthma in (4%)) and 2 controls (1.8%; p=0.001). Higher FeNO(50) values in exposed symptomatic workers compared with healthy control participants (34.65±7.49 vs 13.29±4.29 ppb; p<0.001) suggested bronchial and nasal involvement, although their lung function parameters were normal. Regardless of exposure, a FeNO(50) value of 22.5 ppb seems to be 100% sensitive and 99.4% specific in distinguishing allergic and non-allergic participants. Multivariate analysis of FeNO(50) values in the symptomatic participants showed that they were positively influenced by IgE-mediated allergy (p=0.001) and reported symptom severity (p=0.041), and negatively by smoking status (p=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Ham processing workers, as well as workers involved in any meat processing work that includes curing, should be informed about the occupational risk of sensitisation to mites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4442148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44421482015-05-28 Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers Tafuro, Federica Ridolo, Erminia Goldoni, Matteo Montagni, Marcello Mutti, Antonio Corradi, Massimo BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of storage mites in the development of allergic diseases among ham production workers, and to search for early alterations in lung function tests and early inflammation markers in exhaled air. Respiratory allergies due to storage mites have been reported in people with various occupations but, although such mites are unavoidable when curing ham, there are no published data concerning ham production workers. SETTING: Secondary care. DESIGN: Experimental cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: 220 participants (110 ham production workers and 110 controls) were recruited. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Workers answered a medical questionnaire, and underwent spirometry and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide at 50 mL/s (FeNO(50)) measurements. Those with allergic symptoms also underwent skin prick tests to determine their sensitisation to airborne allergens. A methacholine test was performed in symptomatic participants when spirometry was normal to assess airways hyper-responsiveness. RESULTS: Symptomatic storage mite sensitisation was observed in 16 workers (14.5%) (rhinoconjunctivitis in 15 (63%) and asthma in (4%)) and 2 controls (1.8%; p=0.001). Higher FeNO(50) values in exposed symptomatic workers compared with healthy control participants (34.65±7.49 vs 13.29±4.29 ppb; p<0.001) suggested bronchial and nasal involvement, although their lung function parameters were normal. Regardless of exposure, a FeNO(50) value of 22.5 ppb seems to be 100% sensitive and 99.4% specific in distinguishing allergic and non-allergic participants. Multivariate analysis of FeNO(50) values in the symptomatic participants showed that they were positively influenced by IgE-mediated allergy (p=0.001) and reported symptom severity (p=0.041), and negatively by smoking status (p=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Ham processing workers, as well as workers involved in any meat processing work that includes curing, should be informed about the occupational risk of sensitisation to mites. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4442148/ /pubmed/25991455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007502 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Occupational and Environmental Medicine Tafuro, Federica Ridolo, Erminia Goldoni, Matteo Montagni, Marcello Mutti, Antonio Corradi, Massimo Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers |
title | Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers |
title_full | Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers |
title_fullStr | Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers |
title_full_unstemmed | Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers |
title_short | Work-related allergies to storage mites in Parma (Italy) ham workers |
title_sort | work-related allergies to storage mites in parma (italy) ham workers |
topic | Occupational and Environmental Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25991455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tafurofederica workrelatedallergiestostoragemitesinparmaitalyhamworkers AT ridoloerminia workrelatedallergiestostoragemitesinparmaitalyhamworkers AT goldonimatteo workrelatedallergiestostoragemitesinparmaitalyhamworkers AT montagnimarcello workrelatedallergiestostoragemitesinparmaitalyhamworkers AT muttiantonio workrelatedallergiestostoragemitesinparmaitalyhamworkers AT corradimassimo workrelatedallergiestostoragemitesinparmaitalyhamworkers |