Cargando…
The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review
OBJECTIVES: (1) Summarise chest ultrasound accuracy to diagnose radiological consolidation, referenced to chest CT in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). (2) Directly compared ultrasound with chest X-ray. SETTING: Hospitalised patients. PARTICIPANTS: Studies were eligible if adult partici...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25991460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007838 |
_version_ | 1782372869583405056 |
---|---|
author | Hew, Mark Corcoran, John P Harriss, Elinor K Rahman, Najib M Mallett, Susan |
author_facet | Hew, Mark Corcoran, John P Harriss, Elinor K Rahman, Najib M Mallett, Susan |
author_sort | Hew, Mark |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: (1) Summarise chest ultrasound accuracy to diagnose radiological consolidation, referenced to chest CT in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). (2) Directly compared ultrasound with chest X-ray. SETTING: Hospitalised patients. PARTICIPANTS: Studies were eligible if adult participants in respiratory failure underwent chest ultrasound to diagnose consolidation referenced to CT. Exclusion: (1) not primary study, (2) not respiratory failure, (3) not chest ultrasound, (4) not consolidation, (5) translation unobtainable, (6) unable to extract data, (7) unable to obtain paper. 4 studies comprising 224 participants met inclusion. OUTCOME MEASURES: As planned, paired forest plots display 95% CIs of sensitivity and specificity for ultrasound and chest X-ray. Sensitivity and specificity from each study are plotted in receiver operator characteristics space. Meta-analysis was planned if studies were sufficiently homogeneous and numerous (≥4). Although this numerical requirement was met, meta-analysis was prevented by heterogeneous units of analysis between studies. RESULTS: All studies were in intensive care, with either a high risk of selection bias or high applicability concerns. Studies had unclear or high risk of bias related to use of ultrasound. Only 1 study clearly performed ultrasound within 24 h of respiratory failure diagnosis. Ultrasound sensitivity ranged from 0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97) to 1.00 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.00). Specificity ranged from 0.78 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.94) to 1.00 (0.99 to 1.00). In two studies, chest X-ray had lower sensitivity than ultrasound, but there were insufficient patients to compare specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Four small studies suggest ultrasound is highly sensitive and specific for consolidation in ARF, but high risk of bias and concerns about applicability in all studies may have inflated diagnostic accuracy. Further robustly designed studies are needed to define the role of ultrasound in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (CRD42013006472). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4442194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44421942015-05-28 The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review Hew, Mark Corcoran, John P Harriss, Elinor K Rahman, Najib M Mallett, Susan BMJ Open Respiratory Medicine OBJECTIVES: (1) Summarise chest ultrasound accuracy to diagnose radiological consolidation, referenced to chest CT in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). (2) Directly compared ultrasound with chest X-ray. SETTING: Hospitalised patients. PARTICIPANTS: Studies were eligible if adult participants in respiratory failure underwent chest ultrasound to diagnose consolidation referenced to CT. Exclusion: (1) not primary study, (2) not respiratory failure, (3) not chest ultrasound, (4) not consolidation, (5) translation unobtainable, (6) unable to extract data, (7) unable to obtain paper. 4 studies comprising 224 participants met inclusion. OUTCOME MEASURES: As planned, paired forest plots display 95% CIs of sensitivity and specificity for ultrasound and chest X-ray. Sensitivity and specificity from each study are plotted in receiver operator characteristics space. Meta-analysis was planned if studies were sufficiently homogeneous and numerous (≥4). Although this numerical requirement was met, meta-analysis was prevented by heterogeneous units of analysis between studies. RESULTS: All studies were in intensive care, with either a high risk of selection bias or high applicability concerns. Studies had unclear or high risk of bias related to use of ultrasound. Only 1 study clearly performed ultrasound within 24 h of respiratory failure diagnosis. Ultrasound sensitivity ranged from 0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97) to 1.00 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.00). Specificity ranged from 0.78 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.94) to 1.00 (0.99 to 1.00). In two studies, chest X-ray had lower sensitivity than ultrasound, but there were insufficient patients to compare specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Four small studies suggest ultrasound is highly sensitive and specific for consolidation in ARF, but high risk of bias and concerns about applicability in all studies may have inflated diagnostic accuracy. Further robustly designed studies are needed to define the role of ultrasound in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (CRD42013006472). BMJ Publishing Group 2015-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4442194/ /pubmed/25991460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007838 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Respiratory Medicine Hew, Mark Corcoran, John P Harriss, Elinor K Rahman, Najib M Mallett, Susan The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review |
title | The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review |
title_full | The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review |
title_short | The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for ct-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review |
topic | Respiratory Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25991460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hewmark thediagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview AT corcoranjohnp thediagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview AT harrisselinork thediagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview AT rahmannajibm thediagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview AT mallettsusan thediagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview AT hewmark diagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview AT corcoranjohnp diagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview AT harrisselinork diagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview AT rahmannajibm diagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview AT mallettsusan diagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview |