Cargando…

The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: (1) Summarise chest ultrasound accuracy to diagnose radiological consolidation, referenced to chest CT in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). (2) Directly compared ultrasound with chest X-ray. SETTING: Hospitalised patients. PARTICIPANTS: Studies were eligible if adult partici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hew, Mark, Corcoran, John P, Harriss, Elinor K, Rahman, Najib M, Mallett, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25991460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007838
_version_ 1782372869583405056
author Hew, Mark
Corcoran, John P
Harriss, Elinor K
Rahman, Najib M
Mallett, Susan
author_facet Hew, Mark
Corcoran, John P
Harriss, Elinor K
Rahman, Najib M
Mallett, Susan
author_sort Hew, Mark
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: (1) Summarise chest ultrasound accuracy to diagnose radiological consolidation, referenced to chest CT in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). (2) Directly compared ultrasound with chest X-ray. SETTING: Hospitalised patients. PARTICIPANTS: Studies were eligible if adult participants in respiratory failure underwent chest ultrasound to diagnose consolidation referenced to CT. Exclusion: (1) not primary study, (2) not respiratory failure, (3) not chest ultrasound, (4) not consolidation, (5) translation unobtainable, (6) unable to extract data, (7) unable to obtain paper. 4 studies comprising 224 participants met inclusion. OUTCOME MEASURES: As planned, paired forest plots display 95% CIs of sensitivity and specificity for ultrasound and chest X-ray. Sensitivity and specificity from each study are plotted in receiver operator characteristics space. Meta-analysis was planned if studies were sufficiently homogeneous and numerous (≥4). Although this numerical requirement was met, meta-analysis was prevented by heterogeneous units of analysis between studies. RESULTS: All studies were in intensive care, with either a high risk of selection bias or high applicability concerns. Studies had unclear or high risk of bias related to use of ultrasound. Only 1 study clearly performed ultrasound within 24 h of respiratory failure diagnosis. Ultrasound sensitivity ranged from 0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97) to 1.00 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.00). Specificity ranged from 0.78 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.94) to 1.00 (0.99 to 1.00). In two studies, chest X-ray had lower sensitivity than ultrasound, but there were insufficient patients to compare specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Four small studies suggest ultrasound is highly sensitive and specific for consolidation in ARF, but high risk of bias and concerns about applicability in all studies may have inflated diagnostic accuracy. Further robustly designed studies are needed to define the role of ultrasound in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (CRD42013006472).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4442194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44421942015-05-28 The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review Hew, Mark Corcoran, John P Harriss, Elinor K Rahman, Najib M Mallett, Susan BMJ Open Respiratory Medicine OBJECTIVES: (1) Summarise chest ultrasound accuracy to diagnose radiological consolidation, referenced to chest CT in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). (2) Directly compared ultrasound with chest X-ray. SETTING: Hospitalised patients. PARTICIPANTS: Studies were eligible if adult participants in respiratory failure underwent chest ultrasound to diagnose consolidation referenced to CT. Exclusion: (1) not primary study, (2) not respiratory failure, (3) not chest ultrasound, (4) not consolidation, (5) translation unobtainable, (6) unable to extract data, (7) unable to obtain paper. 4 studies comprising 224 participants met inclusion. OUTCOME MEASURES: As planned, paired forest plots display 95% CIs of sensitivity and specificity for ultrasound and chest X-ray. Sensitivity and specificity from each study are plotted in receiver operator characteristics space. Meta-analysis was planned if studies were sufficiently homogeneous and numerous (≥4). Although this numerical requirement was met, meta-analysis was prevented by heterogeneous units of analysis between studies. RESULTS: All studies were in intensive care, with either a high risk of selection bias or high applicability concerns. Studies had unclear or high risk of bias related to use of ultrasound. Only 1 study clearly performed ultrasound within 24 h of respiratory failure diagnosis. Ultrasound sensitivity ranged from 0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97) to 1.00 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.00). Specificity ranged from 0.78 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.94) to 1.00 (0.99 to 1.00). In two studies, chest X-ray had lower sensitivity than ultrasound, but there were insufficient patients to compare specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Four small studies suggest ultrasound is highly sensitive and specific for consolidation in ARF, but high risk of bias and concerns about applicability in all studies may have inflated diagnostic accuracy. Further robustly designed studies are needed to define the role of ultrasound in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (CRD42013006472). BMJ Publishing Group 2015-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4442194/ /pubmed/25991460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007838 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Respiratory Medicine
Hew, Mark
Corcoran, John P
Harriss, Elinor K
Rahman, Najib M
Mallett, Susan
The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review
title The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review
title_full The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review
title_fullStr The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review
title_short The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for ct-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review
topic Respiratory Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25991460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007838
work_keys_str_mv AT hewmark thediagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview
AT corcoranjohnp thediagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview
AT harrisselinork thediagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview
AT rahmannajibm thediagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview
AT mallettsusan thediagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview
AT hewmark diagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview
AT corcoranjohnp diagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview
AT harrisselinork diagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview
AT rahmannajibm diagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview
AT mallettsusan diagnosticaccuracyofchestultrasoundforctdetectedradiographicconsolidationinhospitalisedadultswithacuterespiratoryfailureasystematicreview