Cargando…

Values in breast cancer screening: an empirical study with Australian experts

OBJECTIVE: To explore what Australian experts value in breast screening, how these values are conceptualised and prioritised, and how they inform experts’ reasoning and judgement about the Australian breast-screening programme. DESIGN: Qualitative study based on interviews with experts. PARTICIPANTS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Parker, Lisa, Rychetnik, Lucie, Carter, Stacy
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:	Ethics
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25995235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006333

Ejemplares similares

Framing overdiagnosis in breast screening: a qualitative study with Australian experts
por: Parker, Lisa M., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The role of communication in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study with Australian experts
por: Parker, Lisa M., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

‘Lines in the sand’: an Australian qualitative study of patient group practices to promote independence from pharmaceutical industry funders
por: Parker, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Interactions between Australian cancer physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: a qualitative study
por: Pokorny, Adrian M J, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

'It’s not something you can take in your hands'. Swiss experts’ perspectives on health data ownership: an interview-based study
por: Martani, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Doctors’ perspectives on adhering to advance care directives when making medical decisions for patients: an Australian interview study
por: Moore, Nadia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies
por: Miller, Jennifer E, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Australian pharmacists’ perspectives on physician-assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews
por: Isaac, Sami, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study
por: Parker, Melissa J, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Diverse experts’ perspectives on ethical issues of using machine learning to predict HIV/AIDS risk in sub-Saharan Africa: a modified Delphi study
por: Nichol, Ariadne A, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

2052: Empirical assessment of a theatrical performance on attitudes and behavior intentions toward research: The informed consent play
por: Rothwell, Erin, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers
por: Shearman, Kirstie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Primary goals, information-giving and men’s understanding: a qualitative study of Australian and UK doctors’ varied communication about PSA screening
por: Pickles, Kristen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The interactions of ethical notions and moral values of immediate stakeholders of immunisation services in two Indian states: a qualitative study
por: Varghese, Joe, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Qualitative study of GPs’ views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the Netherlands: bioethical perspectives
por: Morberg Jämterud, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Added value of an open narrative in verbal autopsies: a mixed-methods evaluation from Malawi
por: Loh, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Identifying ethical values for guiding triage decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic: an Italian ethical committee perspective using Delphi methodology
por: Zeneli, Anita, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Which ethical values underpin England’s National Health Service reset of paediatric and maternity services following COVID-19: a rapid review
por: Chiumento, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Responsible research and innovation: A manifesto for empirical ethics?
por: Gardner, John, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

IEEN workshop report: Professionalism in interdisciplinary and empirical bioethics
por: Owens, John, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Empirical and philosophical analysis of physicians’ judgments of medical indications
por: Björk, Joar, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Pharmaceutical industry funding of events for healthcare professionals on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in Australia: an observational study
por: Behdarvand, Behrad, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Parental comprehension of the benefits/risks of first-line randomised clinical trials in children with solid tumours: a two-stage cross-sectional interview study
por: Chappuy, Hélène, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

IEEN workshop report: Teaching and learning in interdisciplinary and empirical ethics
por: Ives, Jonathan, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The right not to know: the case of psychiatric disorders
por: Bortolotti, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Patient burden and clinical advances associated with postapproval monotherapy cancer drug trials: a retrospective cohort study
por: Carlisle, Benjamin Gregory, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Doctors' perspectives on PSA testing illuminate established differences in prostate cancer screening rates between Australia and the UK: a qualitative study
por: Pickles, Kristen, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Prospective registration trends, reasons for retrospective registration and mechanisms to increase prospective registration compliance: descriptive analysis and survey
por: Hunter, Kylie Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

An empirical study of the ‘underscreened’ in organised cervical screening: experts focus on increasing opportunity as a way of reducing differences in screening rates
por: Williams, Jane H., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Phase I trial compensation: How much do healthy volunteers actually earn from clinical trial enrollment?
por: Fisher, Jill A, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Healthcare access for children and families on the move and migrants
por: Murphy, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Ethical frameworks in clinical research processes during COVID-19: a scoping review
por: Kasherman, Lawrence, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Oncofertility: Fertile Ground for Conflict Between Patient Autonomy and Medical Values
por: Walsh, Sarah K., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence
por: Kalkman, Shona, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

An instrument for assessing the quality of informed consent documents for elective procedures: development and testing
por: Spatz, Erica S, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

General Practitioners’ Experiences of, and Responses to, Uncertainty in Prostate Cancer Screening: Insights from a Qualitative Study
por: Pickles, Kristen, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Author misrepresentation of institutional affiliations: protocol for an exploratory case study
por: Bachelet, Vivienne C, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

2171: Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in Clinical and Translational Studies
por: Otado, Jane A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Approaches to governance of participant-led research: a qualitative case study
por: Grant, Azure Dominique, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Published patterns of spin in biomedical literature: a protocol for a meta-research study
por: Su, Naichuan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_djkmftjh2gt2fqp6iffd0ot427