Cargando…

A retrospective observational analysis to identify patient and treatment-related predictors of outcomes in a community mental health programme

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify patient and treatment factors that affect clinical outcomes of community psychological therapy through the development of a predictive model using historic data from 2 services in London. In addition, the study aims to assess the completeness of data collectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Green, Stuart A, Honeybourne, Emmi, Chalkley, Sylvia R, Poots, Alan J, Woodcock, Thomas, Price, Geraint, Bell, Derek, Green, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25995234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006103
_version_ 1782372876109742080
author Green, Stuart A
Honeybourne, Emmi
Chalkley, Sylvia R
Poots, Alan J
Woodcock, Thomas
Price, Geraint
Bell, Derek
Green, John
author_facet Green, Stuart A
Honeybourne, Emmi
Chalkley, Sylvia R
Poots, Alan J
Woodcock, Thomas
Price, Geraint
Bell, Derek
Green, John
author_sort Green, Stuart A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify patient and treatment factors that affect clinical outcomes of community psychological therapy through the development of a predictive model using historic data from 2 services in London. In addition, the study aims to assess the completeness of data collection, explore how treatment outcomes are discriminated using current criteria for classifying recovery, and assess the feasibility and need for undertaking a future larger population analysis. DESIGN: Observational, retrospective discriminant analysis. SETTING: 2 London community mental health services that provide psychological therapies for common mental disorders including anxiety and depression. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7388 patients attended the services between February 2009 and May 2012, of which 4393 (59%) completed therapy, or there was an agreement to end therapy, and were included in the study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Different combinations of the clinical outcome scores for anxiety Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 and depression Patient Health Questionnaire-9 were used to construct different treatment outcomes. RESULTS: The predictive models were able to assign a positive or negative clinical outcome to each patient based on 5 independent pre-treatment variables, with an accuracy of 69.4% and 79.3%, respectively: initial severity of anxiety and depression, ethnicity, deprivation and gender. The number of sessions attended/missed were also important factors identified in recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Predicting whether patients are likely to have a positive outcome following treatment at entry might allow suitable modification of scheduled treatment, possibly resulting in improvements in outcomes. The model also highlights factors not only associated with poorer outcomes but inextricably linked to prevalence of common mental disorders, emphasising the importance of social determinants not only in poor health but also poor recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4442244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44422442015-05-28 A retrospective observational analysis to identify patient and treatment-related predictors of outcomes in a community mental health programme Green, Stuart A Honeybourne, Emmi Chalkley, Sylvia R Poots, Alan J Woodcock, Thomas Price, Geraint Bell, Derek Green, John BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify patient and treatment factors that affect clinical outcomes of community psychological therapy through the development of a predictive model using historic data from 2 services in London. In addition, the study aims to assess the completeness of data collection, explore how treatment outcomes are discriminated using current criteria for classifying recovery, and assess the feasibility and need for undertaking a future larger population analysis. DESIGN: Observational, retrospective discriminant analysis. SETTING: 2 London community mental health services that provide psychological therapies for common mental disorders including anxiety and depression. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7388 patients attended the services between February 2009 and May 2012, of which 4393 (59%) completed therapy, or there was an agreement to end therapy, and were included in the study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Different combinations of the clinical outcome scores for anxiety Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 and depression Patient Health Questionnaire-9 were used to construct different treatment outcomes. RESULTS: The predictive models were able to assign a positive or negative clinical outcome to each patient based on 5 independent pre-treatment variables, with an accuracy of 69.4% and 79.3%, respectively: initial severity of anxiety and depression, ethnicity, deprivation and gender. The number of sessions attended/missed were also important factors identified in recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Predicting whether patients are likely to have a positive outcome following treatment at entry might allow suitable modification of scheduled treatment, possibly resulting in improvements in outcomes. The model also highlights factors not only associated with poorer outcomes but inextricably linked to prevalence of common mental disorders, emphasising the importance of social determinants not only in poor health but also poor recovery. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4442244/ /pubmed/25995234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006103 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Green, Stuart A
Honeybourne, Emmi
Chalkley, Sylvia R
Poots, Alan J
Woodcock, Thomas
Price, Geraint
Bell, Derek
Green, John
A retrospective observational analysis to identify patient and treatment-related predictors of outcomes in a community mental health programme
title A retrospective observational analysis to identify patient and treatment-related predictors of outcomes in a community mental health programme
title_full A retrospective observational analysis to identify patient and treatment-related predictors of outcomes in a community mental health programme
title_fullStr A retrospective observational analysis to identify patient and treatment-related predictors of outcomes in a community mental health programme
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective observational analysis to identify patient and treatment-related predictors of outcomes in a community mental health programme
title_short A retrospective observational analysis to identify patient and treatment-related predictors of outcomes in a community mental health programme
title_sort retrospective observational analysis to identify patient and treatment-related predictors of outcomes in a community mental health programme
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25995234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006103
work_keys_str_mv AT greenstuarta aretrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT honeybourneemmi aretrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT chalkleysylviar aretrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT pootsalanj aretrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT woodcockthomas aretrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT pricegeraint aretrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT bellderek aretrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT greenjohn aretrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT greenstuarta retrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT honeybourneemmi retrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT chalkleysylviar retrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT pootsalanj retrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT woodcockthomas retrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT pricegeraint retrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT bellderek retrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme
AT greenjohn retrospectiveobservationalanalysistoidentifypatientandtreatmentrelatedpredictorsofoutcomesinacommunitymentalhealthprogramme