Cargando…

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: An update

OBJECTIVE: To review the current role and outcome of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in the management of adrenal tumours. METHODS: A Medline search using the keywords (adrenalectomy, laparoscopy, adrenal masses/tumours) was done for reports published between 1990 and 2011. Key articles were used to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Al-Zahrani, Hassan Mesfer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26558005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.11.003
_version_ 1782372930933489664
author Al-Zahrani, Hassan Mesfer
author_facet Al-Zahrani, Hassan Mesfer
author_sort Al-Zahrani, Hassan Mesfer
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To review the current role and outcome of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in the management of adrenal tumours. METHODS: A Medline search using the keywords (adrenalectomy, laparoscopy, adrenal masses/tumours) was done for reports published between 1990 and 2011. Key articles were used to find more relevant references on the evaluation and laparoscopic management of adrenal masses. RESULTS: The hormonal evaluation is not standardised, but initial screening tests are recommended and followed with confirmatory ones when positive, equivocal or the clinical presentation suggest adrenal hyperfunction. The imaging studies had, and continued to, advance, especially computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography/CT. These advances have increased the accuracy of the diagnosis of adrenal masses, with a reported high sensitivity and specificity of 95–100%. The introduction of laparoscopy has resulted in more adrenal lesions being removed, especially incidental lesions smaller than the 5–6 cm that was previously the indication for surgical excision. The technique has developed and larger lesions of >6 cm are now considered for LA in the proper setting. The transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches are currently widely practised, with minor differences in the outcome. The reported outcome, although mostly retrospective, is excellent and with fewer complications. The role of LA for adrenal malignancy should be considered cautiously. Preoperative imaging signs of invasion into surrounding structures should be considered a contraindication for LA. CONCLUSION: LA is the standard procedure for most adrenal lesions of appropriate size and no signs of surrounding tissue invasion, giving an excellent outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4442880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44428802015-11-10 Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: An update Al-Zahrani, Hassan Mesfer Arab J Urol Review OBJECTIVE: To review the current role and outcome of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) in the management of adrenal tumours. METHODS: A Medline search using the keywords (adrenalectomy, laparoscopy, adrenal masses/tumours) was done for reports published between 1990 and 2011. Key articles were used to find more relevant references on the evaluation and laparoscopic management of adrenal masses. RESULTS: The hormonal evaluation is not standardised, but initial screening tests are recommended and followed with confirmatory ones when positive, equivocal or the clinical presentation suggest adrenal hyperfunction. The imaging studies had, and continued to, advance, especially computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography/CT. These advances have increased the accuracy of the diagnosis of adrenal masses, with a reported high sensitivity and specificity of 95–100%. The introduction of laparoscopy has resulted in more adrenal lesions being removed, especially incidental lesions smaller than the 5–6 cm that was previously the indication for surgical excision. The technique has developed and larger lesions of >6 cm are now considered for LA in the proper setting. The transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches are currently widely practised, with minor differences in the outcome. The reported outcome, although mostly retrospective, is excellent and with fewer complications. The role of LA for adrenal malignancy should be considered cautiously. Preoperative imaging signs of invasion into surrounding structures should be considered a contraindication for LA. CONCLUSION: LA is the standard procedure for most adrenal lesions of appropriate size and no signs of surrounding tissue invasion, giving an excellent outcome. Elsevier 2012-03 2012-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4442880/ /pubmed/26558005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.11.003 Text en © 2012 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Al-Zahrani, Hassan Mesfer
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: An update
title Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: An update
title_full Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: An update
title_fullStr Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: An update
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: An update
title_short Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: An update
title_sort laparoscopic adrenalectomy: an update
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26558005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.11.003
work_keys_str_mv AT alzahranihassanmesfer laparoscopicadrenalectomyanupdate