Cargando…
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience
OBJECTIVES: To summarize the experience of the Middle East in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), to discuss the associated advantages and salient problems, to examine the learning curve encountered compared with that of the pioneering centres in the West, and the contribution of the regional cent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26558004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.01.007 |
_version_ | 1782372938005086208 |
---|---|
author | Khauli, Raja B. Traboulsi, Samer L. Medawar, Walid Abu Dargham, Rana Abdelnoor, Alexander M. Hussein, Maher K. |
author_facet | Khauli, Raja B. Traboulsi, Samer L. Medawar, Walid Abu Dargham, Rana Abdelnoor, Alexander M. Hussein, Maher K. |
author_sort | Khauli, Raja B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To summarize the experience of the Middle East in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), to discuss the associated advantages and salient problems, to examine the learning curve encountered compared with that of the pioneering centres in the West, and the contribution of the regional centres to the worldwide experience. METHODS: We searched Medline and PubMed for all centres performing LDN in the Middle East. Questionnaires were e-mailed to the regional transplantation centres, and programme directors, and leading urological and transplant surgeons were contacted by telephone. RESULTS: LDN in the Middle East was first introduced in 2000; this approach has been pioneered and practised at seven transplant centres within five countries in the region, and was restricted to only three Arab countries, i.e. Lebanon, Egypt and Kuwait. Data collection yielded a total of 888 procedures over one decade, representing only 2% of the total of ≈50,000 transplants during the same period. Despite variability of accurate reporting the overall outcomes were similar to those of open DN. The spectrum of complications was comparable to that from major centres in the USA during their learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of LDN in the Middle East has been gratifying. The relative hesitancy in introducing LDN in the rest of the Arab Middle East is multifaceted. The advantages conferred to the donor underscore the need for further expansion of this approach for kidney retrieval. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4442909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44429092015-11-10 Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience Khauli, Raja B. Traboulsi, Samer L. Medawar, Walid Abu Dargham, Rana Abdelnoor, Alexander M. Hussein, Maher K. Arab J Urol Review OBJECTIVES: To summarize the experience of the Middle East in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), to discuss the associated advantages and salient problems, to examine the learning curve encountered compared with that of the pioneering centres in the West, and the contribution of the regional centres to the worldwide experience. METHODS: We searched Medline and PubMed for all centres performing LDN in the Middle East. Questionnaires were e-mailed to the regional transplantation centres, and programme directors, and leading urological and transplant surgeons were contacted by telephone. RESULTS: LDN in the Middle East was first introduced in 2000; this approach has been pioneered and practised at seven transplant centres within five countries in the region, and was restricted to only three Arab countries, i.e. Lebanon, Egypt and Kuwait. Data collection yielded a total of 888 procedures over one decade, representing only 2% of the total of ≈50,000 transplants during the same period. Despite variability of accurate reporting the overall outcomes were similar to those of open DN. The spectrum of complications was comparable to that from major centres in the USA during their learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of LDN in the Middle East has been gratifying. The relative hesitancy in introducing LDN in the rest of the Arab Middle East is multifaceted. The advantages conferred to the donor underscore the need for further expansion of this approach for kidney retrieval. Elsevier 2012-03 2012-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4442909/ /pubmed/26558004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.01.007 Text en © 2012 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Khauli, Raja B. Traboulsi, Samer L. Medawar, Walid Abu Dargham, Rana Abdelnoor, Alexander M. Hussein, Maher K. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience |
title | Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience |
title_full | Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience |
title_short | Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience |
title_sort | laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the middle east experience |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26558004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.01.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khaulirajab laparoscopicdonornephrectomythemiddleeastexperience AT traboulsisamerl laparoscopicdonornephrectomythemiddleeastexperience AT medawarwalid laparoscopicdonornephrectomythemiddleeastexperience AT abudarghamrana laparoscopicdonornephrectomythemiddleeastexperience AT abdelnooralexanderm laparoscopicdonornephrectomythemiddleeastexperience AT husseinmaherk laparoscopicdonornephrectomythemiddleeastexperience |