Cargando…

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience

OBJECTIVES: To summarize the experience of the Middle East in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), to discuss the associated advantages and salient problems, to examine the learning curve encountered compared with that of the pioneering centres in the West, and the contribution of the regional cent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khauli, Raja B., Traboulsi, Samer L., Medawar, Walid, Abu Dargham, Rana, Abdelnoor, Alexander M., Hussein, Maher K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26558004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.01.007
_version_ 1782372938005086208
author Khauli, Raja B.
Traboulsi, Samer L.
Medawar, Walid
Abu Dargham, Rana
Abdelnoor, Alexander M.
Hussein, Maher K.
author_facet Khauli, Raja B.
Traboulsi, Samer L.
Medawar, Walid
Abu Dargham, Rana
Abdelnoor, Alexander M.
Hussein, Maher K.
author_sort Khauli, Raja B.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To summarize the experience of the Middle East in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), to discuss the associated advantages and salient problems, to examine the learning curve encountered compared with that of the pioneering centres in the West, and the contribution of the regional centres to the worldwide experience. METHODS: We searched Medline and PubMed for all centres performing LDN in the Middle East. Questionnaires were e-mailed to the regional transplantation centres, and programme directors, and leading urological and transplant surgeons were contacted by telephone. RESULTS: LDN in the Middle East was first introduced in 2000; this approach has been pioneered and practised at seven transplant centres within five countries in the region, and was restricted to only three Arab countries, i.e. Lebanon, Egypt and Kuwait. Data collection yielded a total of 888 procedures over one decade, representing only 2% of the total of ≈50,000 transplants during the same period. Despite variability of accurate reporting the overall outcomes were similar to those of open DN. The spectrum of complications was comparable to that from major centres in the USA during their learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of LDN in the Middle East has been gratifying. The relative hesitancy in introducing LDN in the rest of the Arab Middle East is multifaceted. The advantages conferred to the donor underscore the need for further expansion of this approach for kidney retrieval.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4442909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44429092015-11-10 Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience Khauli, Raja B. Traboulsi, Samer L. Medawar, Walid Abu Dargham, Rana Abdelnoor, Alexander M. Hussein, Maher K. Arab J Urol Review OBJECTIVES: To summarize the experience of the Middle East in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), to discuss the associated advantages and salient problems, to examine the learning curve encountered compared with that of the pioneering centres in the West, and the contribution of the regional centres to the worldwide experience. METHODS: We searched Medline and PubMed for all centres performing LDN in the Middle East. Questionnaires were e-mailed to the regional transplantation centres, and programme directors, and leading urological and transplant surgeons were contacted by telephone. RESULTS: LDN in the Middle East was first introduced in 2000; this approach has been pioneered and practised at seven transplant centres within five countries in the region, and was restricted to only three Arab countries, i.e. Lebanon, Egypt and Kuwait. Data collection yielded a total of 888 procedures over one decade, representing only 2% of the total of ≈50,000 transplants during the same period. Despite variability of accurate reporting the overall outcomes were similar to those of open DN. The spectrum of complications was comparable to that from major centres in the USA during their learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of LDN in the Middle East has been gratifying. The relative hesitancy in introducing LDN in the rest of the Arab Middle East is multifaceted. The advantages conferred to the donor underscore the need for further expansion of this approach for kidney retrieval. Elsevier 2012-03 2012-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4442909/ /pubmed/26558004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.01.007 Text en © 2012 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Khauli, Raja B.
Traboulsi, Samer L.
Medawar, Walid
Abu Dargham, Rana
Abdelnoor, Alexander M.
Hussein, Maher K.
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience
title Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience
title_full Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience
title_fullStr Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience
title_short Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The Middle East experience
title_sort laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the middle east experience
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26558004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.01.007
work_keys_str_mv AT khaulirajab laparoscopicdonornephrectomythemiddleeastexperience
AT traboulsisamerl laparoscopicdonornephrectomythemiddleeastexperience
AT medawarwalid laparoscopicdonornephrectomythemiddleeastexperience
AT abudarghamrana laparoscopicdonornephrectomythemiddleeastexperience
AT abdelnooralexanderm laparoscopicdonornephrectomythemiddleeastexperience
AT husseinmaherk laparoscopicdonornephrectomythemiddleeastexperience