Cargando…
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones
OBJECTIVES: To review previous reports and discuss current trends in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and ureterorenoscopy (URS). ESWL was recommended as the first-line treatment for small and intermediate-sized stones in the lower pole, while it is th...
Autores principales: | Knoll, Thomas, Buchholz, Noor, Wendt-Nordahl, Gunnar |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26558046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.06.004 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The clinical and cost effectiveness of surgical interventions for stones in the lower pole of the kidney: the percutaneous nephrolithotomy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole kidney stones randomised controlled trial (PUrE RCT) protocol
por: McClinton, Sam, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treating a 20–30 mm single renal pelvic stone
por: Hassan, Mohammed, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Lower pole renal stone: flexible ureteroscopy or shockwave lithotripsy? The anatomy is the key
Publicado: (2018) -
Does lithotripsy increase stone recurrence? A comparative study between extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and non-fragmenting percutaneous nephrolithotomy
por: El-Assmy, Ahmed, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Flexible ureterorenoscopy is associated with less stone recurrence rates over Shockwave lithotripsy in the management of 10-20 millimeter lower pole renal stone: medium follow-up results
por: Ozgor, Faruk, et al.
Publicado: (2018)