Cargando…

Does intravenous cefuroxime improve the efficacy of ciprofloxacin for preventing infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy? A prospective comparative study

OBJECTIVES: To compare the frequency of infection after transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy of the prostate (TRUSBP) using prophylactic ciprofloxacin with or without adding cefuroxime. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2008 and October 2009, 205 consecutive patients had TRUSBP with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rumaihi, Khalid Al, Majzoub, Ahmad A., Younes, Nagy, Shokeir, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26558055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.04.004
_version_ 1782372943792177152
author Rumaihi, Khalid Al
Majzoub, Ahmad A.
Younes, Nagy
Shokeir, Ahmed
author_facet Rumaihi, Khalid Al
Majzoub, Ahmad A.
Younes, Nagy
Shokeir, Ahmed
author_sort Rumaihi, Khalid Al
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the frequency of infection after transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy of the prostate (TRUSBP) using prophylactic ciprofloxacin with or without adding cefuroxime. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2008 and October 2009, 205 consecutive patients had TRUSBP with the use of oral 500 mg ciprofloxacin twice per day, 2 days before and 3 days after the biopsy (defined as group A). Starting from November 2009 and onwards, 250 consecutive patients had TRUSBP using the same previous protocol of antibiotic prophylaxis but with the addition of intravenous 1.5 g cefuroxime given 30 min before the procedure (defined as group B). The incidence of sepsis after TRUSBP, together with the results of urine and blood cultures and antibiotic sensitivity, were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Fever after TRUSBP was recorded in 18 of 205 patients in group A (8.8%) and in nine of 250 in group B (3.6%); the difference was significant (P = 0.018). Urine culture was positive in 14 and five of patients in groups A and B, respectively, with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing (ESBL) Escherichia coli as the most common organism. The blood culture was positive in seven and three patients in groups A and B, respectively, with ESBL E. coli as the most common organism. All patients who had sepsis after TRUSBP sepsis were treated successfully. CONCLUSION: Adding a single intravenous injection with 1.5 g of cefuroxime to oral ciprofloxacin significantly reduced the frequency of infectious complications after TRUSBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4442934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44429342015-11-10 Does intravenous cefuroxime improve the efficacy of ciprofloxacin for preventing infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy? A prospective comparative study Rumaihi, Khalid Al Majzoub, Ahmad A. Younes, Nagy Shokeir, Ahmed Arab J Urol Oncology/Reconstruction Original Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the frequency of infection after transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy of the prostate (TRUSBP) using prophylactic ciprofloxacin with or without adding cefuroxime. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2008 and October 2009, 205 consecutive patients had TRUSBP with the use of oral 500 mg ciprofloxacin twice per day, 2 days before and 3 days after the biopsy (defined as group A). Starting from November 2009 and onwards, 250 consecutive patients had TRUSBP using the same previous protocol of antibiotic prophylaxis but with the addition of intravenous 1.5 g cefuroxime given 30 min before the procedure (defined as group B). The incidence of sepsis after TRUSBP, together with the results of urine and blood cultures and antibiotic sensitivity, were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Fever after TRUSBP was recorded in 18 of 205 patients in group A (8.8%) and in nine of 250 in group B (3.6%); the difference was significant (P = 0.018). Urine culture was positive in 14 and five of patients in groups A and B, respectively, with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing (ESBL) Escherichia coli as the most common organism. The blood culture was positive in seven and three patients in groups A and B, respectively, with ESBL E. coli as the most common organism. All patients who had sepsis after TRUSBP sepsis were treated successfully. CONCLUSION: Adding a single intravenous injection with 1.5 g of cefuroxime to oral ciprofloxacin significantly reduced the frequency of infectious complications after TRUSBP. Elsevier 2012-12 2012-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4442934/ /pubmed/26558055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.04.004 Text en © 2012 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Oncology/Reconstruction Original Article
Rumaihi, Khalid Al
Majzoub, Ahmad A.
Younes, Nagy
Shokeir, Ahmed
Does intravenous cefuroxime improve the efficacy of ciprofloxacin for preventing infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy? A prospective comparative study
title Does intravenous cefuroxime improve the efficacy of ciprofloxacin for preventing infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy? A prospective comparative study
title_full Does intravenous cefuroxime improve the efficacy of ciprofloxacin for preventing infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy? A prospective comparative study
title_fullStr Does intravenous cefuroxime improve the efficacy of ciprofloxacin for preventing infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy? A prospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Does intravenous cefuroxime improve the efficacy of ciprofloxacin for preventing infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy? A prospective comparative study
title_short Does intravenous cefuroxime improve the efficacy of ciprofloxacin for preventing infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy? A prospective comparative study
title_sort does intravenous cefuroxime improve the efficacy of ciprofloxacin for preventing infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy? a prospective comparative study
topic Oncology/Reconstruction Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26558055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.04.004
work_keys_str_mv AT rumaihikhalidal doesintravenouscefuroximeimprovetheefficacyofciprofloxacinforpreventinginfectiouscomplicationsaftertransrectalprostatebiopsyaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT majzoubahmada doesintravenouscefuroximeimprovetheefficacyofciprofloxacinforpreventinginfectiouscomplicationsaftertransrectalprostatebiopsyaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT younesnagy doesintravenouscefuroximeimprovetheefficacyofciprofloxacinforpreventinginfectiouscomplicationsaftertransrectalprostatebiopsyaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT shokeirahmed doesintravenouscefuroximeimprovetheefficacyofciprofloxacinforpreventinginfectiouscomplicationsaftertransrectalprostatebiopsyaprospectivecomparativestudy