Cargando…
Low-dose unenhanced computed tomography for diagnosing stone disease in obese patients
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the detectability, size, location and density of urinary stones with unenhanced computed tomography (CT), using the half-radiation (low) dose (LDCT) technique, compared with the standard-dose CT (SDCT), in obese patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 50 patients wi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26558037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.02.007 |
_version_ | 1782372947985432576 |
---|---|
author | Abou El-Ghar, Mohamed E. Shokeir, Ahmed A. Refaie, Huda F. El-Nahas, Ahmed R. |
author_facet | Abou El-Ghar, Mohamed E. Shokeir, Ahmed A. Refaie, Huda F. El-Nahas, Ahmed R. |
author_sort | Abou El-Ghar, Mohamed E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the detectability, size, location and density of urinary stones with unenhanced computed tomography (CT), using the half-radiation (low) dose (LDCT) technique, compared with the standard-dose CT (SDCT), in obese patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 50 patients with a body mass index of >30 kg/m(2) and bilateral renal stones diagnosed with SDCT, and managed on one side. All the patients had LDCT during the follow-up and SDCT was used as a reference for comparison. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients, the right side was affected in 27 and the left side in 23. In all, 35 patients had a single stone while the remaining 15 had multiple stones. With SDCT, 95 stones were detected; there were 45 of ⩽5 mm, 46 of 6–15 mm and only four of >15 mm. LDCT barely detected three stones of <3 mm, compared with SDCT, while larger stones had the same appearance at both scans. The site of stone in the kidney or the ureter did not affect its detection on LDCT vs. SDCT. The mean stone diameter was identical in both techniques. At LDCT, all stones were detected with no difference in their number, location or density vs. SDCT. However, the tube current and radiation dose were significantly lower with LDCT. CONCLUSIONS: In obese patients with stone disease, LDCT is as accurate as SDCT, while avoiding exposure of the patient to high-dose radiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4442952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44429522015-11-10 Low-dose unenhanced computed tomography for diagnosing stone disease in obese patients Abou El-Ghar, Mohamed E. Shokeir, Ahmed A. Refaie, Huda F. El-Nahas, Ahmed R. Arab J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the detectability, size, location and density of urinary stones with unenhanced computed tomography (CT), using the half-radiation (low) dose (LDCT) technique, compared with the standard-dose CT (SDCT), in obese patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 50 patients with a body mass index of >30 kg/m(2) and bilateral renal stones diagnosed with SDCT, and managed on one side. All the patients had LDCT during the follow-up and SDCT was used as a reference for comparison. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients, the right side was affected in 27 and the left side in 23. In all, 35 patients had a single stone while the remaining 15 had multiple stones. With SDCT, 95 stones were detected; there were 45 of ⩽5 mm, 46 of 6–15 mm and only four of >15 mm. LDCT barely detected three stones of <3 mm, compared with SDCT, while larger stones had the same appearance at both scans. The site of stone in the kidney or the ureter did not affect its detection on LDCT vs. SDCT. The mean stone diameter was identical in both techniques. At LDCT, all stones were detected with no difference in their number, location or density vs. SDCT. However, the tube current and radiation dose were significantly lower with LDCT. CONCLUSIONS: In obese patients with stone disease, LDCT is as accurate as SDCT, while avoiding exposure of the patient to high-dose radiation. Elsevier 2012-09 2012-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4442952/ /pubmed/26558037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.02.007 Text en © 2012 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Abou El-Ghar, Mohamed E. Shokeir, Ahmed A. Refaie, Huda F. El-Nahas, Ahmed R. Low-dose unenhanced computed tomography for diagnosing stone disease in obese patients |
title | Low-dose unenhanced computed tomography for diagnosing stone disease in obese patients |
title_full | Low-dose unenhanced computed tomography for diagnosing stone disease in obese patients |
title_fullStr | Low-dose unenhanced computed tomography for diagnosing stone disease in obese patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Low-dose unenhanced computed tomography for diagnosing stone disease in obese patients |
title_short | Low-dose unenhanced computed tomography for diagnosing stone disease in obese patients |
title_sort | low-dose unenhanced computed tomography for diagnosing stone disease in obese patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26558037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.02.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abouelgharmohamede lowdoseunenhancedcomputedtomographyfordiagnosingstonediseaseinobesepatients AT shokeirahmeda lowdoseunenhancedcomputedtomographyfordiagnosingstonediseaseinobesepatients AT refaiehudaf lowdoseunenhancedcomputedtomographyfordiagnosingstonediseaseinobesepatients AT elnahasahmedr lowdoseunenhancedcomputedtomographyfordiagnosingstonediseaseinobesepatients |